Safe Haven | BoomBustBloggers Appear to be Pressuring PNC

"No warning can save a people determined
to grow suddenly rich." - Lord Overstone

HOME

ARCHIVES

FORUMS

SITE MAP

ABOUT US

Home -> Archives -> Reggie Middleton -> BoomBustBloggers Appear to be Pressuring PNC

Printer Friendly

eMail Article

July 27, 2009

BoomBustBloggers Appear to be Pressuring PNC
by Reggie Middleton

It looks as if a BoomBustBlogger subscriber has made it into the news with a large option trade - STOCKS NEWS US-Bears flock to PNC Financial put options

PNC Financial Services fell 4.33 percent to $35.79. It reported a steep drop in quarterly earnings, hurt by credit losses and in its options, bears clawed at puts in the November contract, said Andrew Wilkinson, market analyst at Interactive Brokers Group. One player apparently enacted a ratio put spread in a bid to profit to the downside, he said. The Nov $36 strike had 20,000 puts bought for an average premium of $4.08 apiece spread against the sale of 40,000 puts at the Nov $31 strike for $1.97. The cost of the trade was 14 cents and yields maximum potential profits of $4.86 if shares fall to $31 by expiration. He also noted new put action at the Nov $29 strike and the $27.5 strike where 15,000 puts traded.

As subscribers know, we have determined that the overly lenient government stress tests (SCAP) will leave more than one bank requiring an additional capital raise before this credit malaise is all said and done. See The Re-Release of the Open Source Mortgage Default Model and Green Shoots are Being Fertilized by Brown Turds in the Mortgage Markets for our in depth take on loan losses to come for all banks who participated in residential real estate lending. These are the facts, unfiltered by green shoots mantra. PNC's government mandated $600 million capital raise was a joke,plain and simple. They will probably require multiples of that amount due to their National City acquisition and a careful glance at their balance sheet easily supports that assertion.

I have decided to show all a summary of what is arming subscribers to remain bearish against PNC, among other banks.

Below, please find a comparison bewteen the government's stress test assumptions up to two years out, and our more feasible findings. Remain cognizant that the government's worse case scenarios under the SCAP stress test two years from now have been pierced are on track to be pierced by the end of the quarter - unemployment, residential loan losses, consumer loan losses, etc. The stress tests were invalidated by real world data almost before they were completed. Prudently, it is already time for the banks to undergo another round of more realistically applied stress testing. Actually, the government is allowing banks to repay the TARP and take imprudent amounts of risk heretofore unheard of in regulated bank holding companies, ex. Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan. HMMM! What will it take for us to learn our lesson???

	Gov 2 yr cumulative loss rate range		Gov 2 yr cumulative average loss rate for US banks		2 yr cumulative loss rate for PNC
	Base Case	Adverse Case	Base Case	Adverse Case	Fed's loss rate assumptions	Realistic loss rate assumptions
First Lien Mortgages	5 - 6	7 - 8.5	5.5%	7.8%	8.1%	9.9%
Prime	1.5 - 2.5	3 - 4	2.0%	3.5%
Alt-A	7.5 - 9.5	9.5 - 13	8.5%	11.3%

Subprime	15 - 20	21 - 28	17.5%	24.5%	12.7%	Subprime losses not segregated in PNC reporting, Geo losses gross of recoveries est @ 38.7%
Second/Junior Lien Mortgages	9 - 12	12 - 16	10.5%	14.0%
Closed-end Junior Liens	18 - 20	22 - 25	19.0%	23.5%		3.2%
HELOCs	6 - 8	8 - 11	7.0%	9.5%		3.7%

C&I Loans	3 - 4	5 - 8	3.5%	6.5%	6.0%	6.1%

CRE	5 - 7.5	9 - 12	6.3%	10.5%	11.2%	11.6%
Construction	8 - 12	15 - 18	10.0%	16.5%		21.5%
Multifamily	3.5 - 6.5	10 - 11	5.0%	10.5%		7.3%
Nonfarm, Non-residential	4 - 5	7 - 9	4.5%	8.0%		6.9%

Credit Cards	12 - 17	18 - 20	14.5%	19.0%	22.3%	21.4%
Other Consumer Securities (AFS and HTM)	4 - 6	8 - 12	5.0%	10.0%

Others*	2 - 4	4 - 10	3.0%	7.0%		2.5%
Total loan losses						7.3%

*including misc commitments and obligations

Drawing from data gathered from the FDIC and the NY Fed, we independently calculated the default, charge-off and recovery rates for various loan categories on a geographic, state by state basis. Below, you will find the states where PNC has the highest concentration of loans. Notice how much worse the historical numbers look using the government's own projected data (when not purposely scrubbed to was optimistic) as compared to the loss estimates used in the SCAP stress tests. Keep in mind that we are comparing three month old data with forward looking government projections, all the while acknowledging that we are on a downward sloping curve as it applies to housing prices and upward sloping curve in terms of unemployment. In other words, things are still getting worse, yet the numbers from 3 or 4 months ago already pierce the worst case scenario for up to two years into the future.

Primary geographies of PNC and National City	1Q-08	2Q-08	3Q-08	4Q-08	% change since 20008	Alt-A loss rate	Sub prime loss rate
Pennsylvania	2.4%	1.2%	-0.4%	-0.8%	2.4%	14.3%	33.5%
New Jersey	-1.5%	-3.2%	-4.8%	-5.4%	-14.1%	23.5%	43.4%
Washington	3.0%	0.5%	-2.0%	-3.8%	-2.4%	11.1%	27.1%
Maryland	-1.4%	-4.2%	-6.3%	-7.7%	-18.3%	18.8%	38.6%
Virginia	-0.3%	-2.6%	-3.8%	-4.6%	-10.9%	21.2%	37.3%
Ohio	0.6%	-0.3%	-2.3%	-1.9%	-3.9%	15.6%	35.4%
Kentucky	2.8%	3.1%	1.7%	1.0%	8.8%	14.2%	34.7%
Delaware	1.0%	-1.2%	-2.0%	-4.2%	-6.3%	16.2%	39.1%
Florida	-8.6%	-13.0%	-16.4%	-19.5%	-46.5%	37.1%	52.3%
Illinois	0.5%	-0.6%	-2.6%	-3.0%	-5.6%	22.9%	41.3%
Indiana	2.3%	1.6%	-0.1%	-0.5%	3.3%	16.1%	35.2%
Michigan	-3.5%	-5.2%	-7.0%	-6.9%	-20.8%	22.5%	45.7%
Missouri	1.5%	0.6%	-0.3%	-0.6%	1.3%	13.4%	36.1%
Wisconsin	1.7%	0.8%	-0.9%	-0.9%	0.6%	17.8%	41.7%
Average (assuming equal weights)	0.0%	-1.6%	-3.4%	-4.2%	-8.9%	18.9%	38.7%

Overall U.S	-0.2%	-1.9%	-3.9%	-4.5%	-10.1%

*Price change relative to National Average*	*0.2%*	*0.3%*	*0.5%*	*0.3%*	*1.3%*

Source: Federal Housing Finance Agency

Here is a table, fully laid out, illustrating the capital requirements for PNC under variety of scenarios. We are estimating a capital requirement of approximtely $4.1 billion, gross of the $600 million required by the government. There is no wonder why PNC has not repaid the TARP yet. As a matter of fact, no company should have been allowed to repay the TARP until a second, considerably more realistic stress test was applied. In addition, the stress test should be applied on a quarterly or bi-annual basis from now on.

Base Case Scenario	Min Tangible Equity Capital Ratio	Capital to be raised ($ mn)	TEC $ mn (post add capital )	Tangible Assets $ mn (post add cap)	No of shares (mn)	Dilution Impact
2010 estimates	2.1%	0	4,963	237,010	0.0	0.0%
	3.0%	2,213	7,177	239,223	52.4	11.8%
	3.5%	3,453	8,416	240,463	81.8	18.4%
	4.0%	4,705	9,669	241,715	111.5	25.0%
	4.5%	5,971	10,934	242,981	141.5	31.8%
	5.0%	7,250	12,213	244,259	171.8	38.6%
	5.5%	8,542	13,505	245,552	202.4	45.5%
	6.0%	9,848	14,811	246,858	233.4	52.4%
	6.5%	11,168	16,132	248,178	264.6	59.4%
	7.0%	12,502	17,466	249,512	296.3	66.5%

Base Case Scenario	Tier one Capital	Capital to be raised ($ mn)	Tier One Capital 2010 $ mn (post add cap)	Risk weighted Assets ($ mn)	No of shares (mn)	Dilution Impact
2010 estimates	8.0%	0	24,612	237,010	0.0	0.0%
	9.0%	0	24,612	237,010	0.0	0.0%
	10.0%	0	24,612	237,010	0.0	0.0%
	10.4%	0	24,612	237,010	0.0	0.0%
	11.6%	3,259	27,871	240,269	77.2	17.3%
	12.4%	5,453	30,065	242,463	129.2	29.0%
	12.8%	6,565	31,178	243,575	155.6	34.9%

The "lite" version of the "real" PNC stress test conducted in May by my staff and I is now available for public download. Notice how prescient it is now, and then, in light of PNC's recent earnings announcement - PNC profit down 87 pct, misses view on bad loans 23 Jul 2009.

PNC stress test write up - public lite 2009-07-27 02:37:11 193.21 Kb

Click here to subscribe to my research and opinion.

Reggie Middleton
Reggie Middleton, LLC
Perpetual Interests, LLCTM
http://boombustblog.com/

Who am I?

Well, I fancy myself the personification of the free thinking maverick, the ultimate non-conformist as it applies to investment and analysis. I am definitively outside the box - not your typical or stereotypical Wall Street investor. I work out of my home, not a Manhattan office. I build my own technology and perform my own research - in lieu of buying it or following the crowd. I create and follow my own macro strategies and am by definition, a contrarian to the nth degree.

Since I use my research as a tool for my own investing to actually put food on my table, I can stand behind it as doing what it is supposed too - educate, illustrate and elucidate. I do not sell advice, I am not a reporter hence do not sell stories, and I do not sell research. I am an entrepreneur who exists just outside of mainstream corporate America and Wall Street. This allows me freedom to do things that many can not. For instance, I pride myself on developing some of the highest quality research available, regardless of price. No conflicts of interest, no corporate politics, no special favors. Just the hard truth as I have found it - and believe me, my team and I do find it! I welcome any and all to peruse my blog, use my custom hacked collaborative social tools, read the articles, download the files, and make a critical comparison of the opinion referencing the situation at hand and the time stamp on the blog post to the reality both at the time of the post and the present. Hopefully, you will be as impressed with the Boom Bust as I am and our constituency.

I pay for significant information and data, and am well aware of the value of quality research. I find most currently available research lacking, in both quality and quantity. The reason why I had to create my own research staff was due to my dissatisfaction with what was currently available - to both individuals and institutions.

So here I am, creating my own research for my own investment activity. What really sets my actions apart is that I offer much of what I produce to the public without charge - free to distribute and redistribute, as long as it is left unaltered and full attribution is given to the author and owner. Why would I do such a thing when others easily charge 5 and 6 digits annually for what some may consider a lesser product? It is akin to open source analysis! My ideas and implementations are actually improved and fine tuned when bounced off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu of that of the few - no matter how smart those few may believe themselves to be.

Very recently, I have started charging for the forensics portion of my work, which has freed up the resources to develop the site to deliver even more research for free, particularly on the global macro and opinion front. This move has allowed me to serve an more diverse constituency, which now includes the institutional consumer (ie., investment turned consumer banks, hedge funds, pensions, etc,) as well as the newbie individual investor who is just getting started - basically the two polar opposites of the investing spectrum. I am proud to announce major banks as paying clients, and brand new investors who take my book recommendations and opinions on true wealth and success to heart.

So, this is how I use my background and knowledge in new media, distributed computing, risk management, insurance, financial engineering, real estate, corporate valuation and financial analysis to pursue, analyze and capitalize on global macroeconomic opportunities. I have included a more in depth bio at the bottom of the page for those who really, really need to know more about me.

Visit his blog Boom Bust Blog.