|
How much excitement can a statement by the Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee
(FOMC) generate? Given that the Fed has been printing over a $1 trillion of
fresh currency over the past year, more are indeed taking note when the Fed
speaks.
In our assessment, the Fed statement is a compromise of what may be an internal
dispute at the FOMC. We are referring to a $300 billion program to buy Treasury
Bonds, previously scheduled to run out in September. Buying Treasury Bonds
is intended to lower long-term interest rates; and from what we can tell, it
is in the Fed's foremost interest to keep long-term rates low to keep the nascent
economic recovery on track.
However, massive financing requirements by the federal government, states,
as well as the private sector, not to speak of international public and private
issuers, may push the cost of borrowing higher this fall. Alas, the Fed wants
to keep some powder dry to intervene in the market.
Trouble is that there's very little powder left in the approved program. In
the past, our Senior Economic Adviser and former St. Louis Fed President William
Poole has referred to the Fed's initiatives akin to sipping from the ocean
with a straw. It may not be prudent to open a new box of powder at the last
minute, but if the Fed intends to use it, the market should be prepared for
it. Hence, it may have made sense to increase the program now.
The committee wanted none of that, yet to admit that something may need to
be done, they extended the length of the program without the amount. That's
like saying we keep the bar open an extra couple of hours, but good luck finding
any alcohol. With many alcoholics in the room (we are referring to market participants
addicted to cheap credit, not Fed officials), we have our doubts they won't
convince the barkeeper (the Fed) to make more cheap booze (currency) available.
All of this may be a prudent tactic. More likely, however, it reflects an
internal battle at the Fed, as some are calling for less, others for more cheap
credit. Is the Fed becoming a rudderless ship? It may require a crisis to see
strong leadership yet again. And another credit crunch we may get if the cost
of borrowing goes up.
Of course, we wouldn't have this discussion if the Fed allowed market forces
to play out and weed out the weak players. But the political will to pursue
sound monetary policy seems absent all too often as the credit crisis evolves.
|