|
This is a snippet from a recent issue of the Gold Forecaster with Subscriber-only
parts excluded.
As an almost revered subject, the question of whether central banks across
the world will be buyers or sellers of gold is one usually left until after
the event. Central Banks themselves are usually very unhappy to talk about
their gold policy. When they do it is a once-in-several-years-event. As a
result we watch the behavior patterns of the last decade to see what lies
ahead.
First we look at the I.M.F and look at just how it will support gold.
The I.M.F. Gold Sales.
We have been waiting so long for clarity on the policy the I.M.F. are to adopt
with the sale of their 403.63 tonnes of gold. The IMF Executive Board has now
approved the sale of 403.3 metric tons. The head of the I.M.F., Strauss-Kahn
said, "These sales will be conducted in a responsible and transparent manner
that avoids disruption of the gold market. Most importantly, the sales
are strictly limited to 403.3 metric tonnes, which is one-eighth of the fund's
total holdings, so the IMF will continue to hold a relatively large amount
of its assets in gold."
Prior to selling the gold on the market, the I.M.F. is prepared to sell
the gold directly to central banks or other official sector holders.
These sales to official sector holders will be conducted at market prices
and would shift official gold holdings without changing total official gold
holdings.
Any gold sales on the market would be phased over time, the I.M.F. said. Regular
external reporting on gold sales will also be provided to assure markets that
gold sales are being conducted in a responsible manner.
Let's
be clear on this, if the I.M.F. are to offer this gold to other central banks
before offering the gold to the 'open market' they are likely to receive bids
that would certainly confirm that central banks [whether few or many is irrelevant]
value gold in their reserves and are prepared to buy it in even at these prices!
If all the 403 tonnes is sold this way, then that confirmation will elevate
gold as a reserve asset and a measure of value.
If there is an amount left over, it will be sold in a manner that will not
bring the price down brutally [avoids disruption of the gold market].
Which large $ surplus holding nations can afford this? Far more than just
China or Russia! We expect the I.M.F. is already receiving offers from these
central banks. So will any of this gold make it to the open market? What if
only 100 tonnes are left for the market, what if none is left? Sales of this
gold to any central bank will be positive for the gold price. Sales of all
of it will bring a confidence to the gold price that will send it to new heights!
We believe that this statement from Strauss-Kahn, in itself is extremely positive
for the gold price and will represent confirmation of gold's role in the monetary
system.
The New Central Bank Gold Agreement.
Take a look at the Table above, on the tonnages of gold selling by the Central
Bank Gold Agreement Signatories [in the latest Gold Forecaster - Subscribers
only], over the last five years. With the final week of this Agreement
on us, the future of European central bank selling becomes very clear to us.
As you can see, the original intention of the signatories to the Agreement
was that they wanted to bring transparency to their gold sales, so as to make
it clear to the world that they were not going to dump gold onto the market,
a fear that had persisted for the previous 20 years prior to the "Washington
Agreement". To that end, they announced the amounts they were going to sell
in the future. It was not an announcement to sell an amount during the five
years of the agreement, but an announcement of their total future sales, as
you can see in the Table.
Some countries made no announcement and made unexpected sales. The E.C.B.,
Spain and Belgium were the only countries that did this. But Belgium has not
sold any gold since 2006 and Spain has not sold since 2007.
However, it became clear that these were limited, with the exception of the
E.C.B. who confirmed they had sold, after the event. They have sold each year
of the Agreement. The question is, "will they sell under the new Agreement
starting September 26th 2009" [next week].
More importantly, since Switzerland's announcement to sell an extra 150 tonnes, no
announcements to sell have been made by any country that signed the Agreement.
Take another look at this Table and you will see that the residual amounts
still to be sold are very small and lie in the hands of countries that have
not sold for the last three and two years respectively. Now add to that,
that the number of signatories has increased substantially [with signatories
who hold barely any gold anyway and with no announcements being made to sell
from them] and you have a remarkable picture emerging. There appear to be
no sellers among the signatories at all!
Yes, the agreement allows for up to 400 tonnes a year to be sold. But as we
mentioned in an earlier essay, this 400 tonne limit allows for the I.M.F.
to sell its 403 tonnes anyway it wishes under this agreement, in one shot,
or over the period in dribs and drabs, whichever way they want to go. So this
400 tonnes is for the benefit not of the signatories, but for the I.M.F.!
But will they buy? Two points must be made here: -
-
The Agreement is an agreement to limit sales of gold and makes
no reference to buying of gold.
-
The original purpose of selling the gold was in support of a newly launched
currency, the €. Now it is well established there is no reason to
sell more, particularly when one considers how against national interests
past sales have been shown to be by a rising gold price.
With gold having risen nearly fourfold since the first European central bank
gold agreement [the "Washington Agreement"] gold has proved itself as an invaluable
reserve asset since the turn of the century. The problem is that the States
and Europe are totally committed to paper currencies, with only a hidden and
almost unrecognized backing of gold. Gold in this role is only designed for
use in case of emergency [in extremis]. For the States or Europe to be seen
to be buying gold would be seen as an admission of failure of the paper currency
system. So while they will no longer be sellers of gold, we doubt they will
be buyers in the next couple of years.
Their support of the gold price comes then from the termination of their sales,
removing what was up to 400 tonnes supply from the market?
Russia
So will any central banks will be buyers? Russia has stated it wants to see
10% of its reserves in gold, but that is now several thousand tonnes of gold,
just not available at anywhere near current prices. But they are on record
as having bought in the 'open' market. They have bought up to 4 tonnes a month
this year [9 tonnes in August] and from the end of last year. But they have
made no announcement on whether they have been buying gold from local producers, before
it reaches the open market. If they are buying locally, then the amount
of 1 tonne a week they are buying in the open market must be in addition
to this. We will have to wait until the evidence is before us before we
can say they bought over 300 tonnes this year.
China
At one point China held only 300 tonnes in the gold and foreign exchange reserves.
Then an announcement was made that they had doubled this to 600. Now this year
they again announced that they had been buying gold at the rate of 91 tonnes
a year since then. At the moment this reserve level is 1,054 tonnes. The Chinese
way of accounting and buying allows for this to be hidden. This past week we
heard from Mr. Cheng of the Chinese government who made this extraordinary
comment to Mr. Ambrose Evans-Pritchard of the Daily Telegraph, "Gold is
definitely an alternative, but when we buy, the price goes up. We have to do
it carefully so as not stimulate the market," he said. Why is this extraordinary?
Because China produces the most gold in the world and can also buy from local
producers, without a ripple in the market place. Unless it buys in the 'open'
market, China cannot 'stimulate the market' except in the longer term because
of the reduction in supply. It certainly does not make sense to buy in the
'open' market without buying local production too. While it is an assumption,
at the moment, it appears that China is buying at least 91 tonnes a year [as
they reported] and with local production of over 270 tonnes, it looks like
they are buying around 90 - 360 tonnes a year?
Will other central banks start to buy gold? We know that South Africa has
stated that they are gold buyers, but not the amount. We believe that other
central banks will become buyers, if they are in a surplus position to do so.
We could not say when. If the $ does crash [$1.60+: €1] it is more than
likely than many central banks will become buyers, but we will only know after
the event.
But while Russia and China are buying, the pressure on other banks to buy
gold is growing as the $ and other currencies become subject to difficult questions.
So we do believe that gold already is attractive to central banks. They will
keep silent on this at all times because of the fear of "stimulating' the market.
Nevertheless their actions and inactions are supporting if not raising the
gold price!
The Impact on the Gold Price in price terms?
For Subscribers only!
Gold Forecaster regularly covers all fundamental and
Technical aspects of the gold price in the weekly newsletter. To subscribe,
please visit www.GoldForecaster.com.
|