|
What if tomorrow morning you woke up to headlines that yet another Chinese
drone bombing on US soil killed several dozen ranchers in a rural community
while they were sleeping? That a drone aircraft had come across the Canadian
border in the middle of the night and carried out the latest of many attacks?
What if it was claimed that many of the victims harbored anti-Chinese sentiments,
but most of the dead were innocent women and children? And what if the Chinese
administration, in an effort to improve its public image in the US, had approved
an aid package to send funds to help with American roads and schools and promote
Chinese values here?
Most Americans would not stand for it. Yet the above hypothetical events are
similar to what our government is doing in Pakistan. Last week, Congress did
approve an aid package for Pakistan for the stated purposes of improving our
image and promoting democracy. I again made the point on the floor of the House
that still no one seems to hear: What if this happened on US soil? What if
innocent Americans were being killed in repeated drone attacks carried out
by some foreign force who was trying to fix our problems for us? Would sending
money help their image? If another nation committed this type of violence and
destruction on our homeland, would we be at all interested in adopting their
values?
Sadly, one thing that has entirely escaped modern American foreign policy
is empathy. Without much humility or regard for human life, our foreign policy
has been reduced to alternately bribing and bombing other nations, all with
the stated goal of "promoting democracy". But if a country democratically elects
a leader who is not sufficiently pro-American, our government will refuse to
recognize them, will impose sanctions on them, and will possibly even support
covert efforts to remove them. Democracy is obviously not what we are interested
in. It is more likely that our government is interested in imposing its will
on other governments. This policy of endless intervention in the affairs of
others is very damaging to American liberty and security.
If we were really interested in democracy, peace, prosperity and safety, we
would pursue more free trade with other countries. Free and abundant trade
is much more conducive to peace because it is generally bad business to kill
your customers. When one's livelihood is on the line, and the business agreements
are mutually beneficial, it is in everyone's best interests to maintain cooperative
and friendly relations and not kill each other. But instead, to force other
countries to bend to our will, we impose trade barriers and sanctions. If our
government really wanted to promote freedom, Americans would be free to travel
and trade with whoever they wished. And, if we would simply look at our own
policies around the world through the eyes of others, we would understand how
these actions make us more targeted and therefore less safe from terrorism.
The only answer is get back to free trade with all and entangling alliances
with none. It is our bombs and sanctions and condescending aid packages that
isolate us.
|
Dr. Ron Paul
Project Freedom
Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation
as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading
spokesman in Washington for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free
markets, and a return to sound monetary policies based on commodity-backed
currency. He is known among both his colleagues in Congress and his constituents
for his consistent voting record in the House of Representatives: Dr. Paul
never votes for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized
by the Constitution. In the words of former Treasury Secretary William Simon,
Dr. Paul is the "one exception to the Gang of 535" on Capitol Hill.
Copyright © 2006-2009 Dr. Ron Paul
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|