|
Bounty is the child of shortage. The grandchild of bounty is also called bounty,
and begets again shortage. When those generations are born with fanfare, the
world is made well aware of the situation. However, creeping shortages go unnoticed.
The latter are also more serious as they reflect structural changes emerging
in supply-demand. Globally, Agri-Foods may be giving birth to an era more akin
to shortage than bounty.
During most of the post World War II era, supply was dominant in the global
Agri-Food system. That situation seemed to many to be likely to persist indefinitely.
In the last decade, as a new Chinese economy emerged, the global Agri-Food
system has become more dominated by demand. China has learned that feeding
the population is not a food problem, but an income problem. Give the people
jobs that generate incomes, and they will simply buy the food. India, with
another billion people to feed, may also, despite the best efforts of some
politicians, come to fostering income growth in order to feed the nation.
Analysts persist in a misunderstanding of the economic development of China.
Yes, that periodic economic disturbances could occur there do to economic imbalances
is acknowledged. Any disruptions in economic growth, should and when they happen,
will not interrupt the longer term growth trend. The much predicted crash of
the Chinese economy simply has not happened. Tomorrow in China though is far
brighter than ever, and certainly far brighter than in a nation dominated by
wealth destroying policies of the Obama Regime.
Those looking to the future are indeed acknowledging
the middle income miracle unfolding in China. bloomberg.com, 4 November
2009, reported, "Disney Wins Approval for Park in China's Richest City," "Walt
Disney Co. won government approval to build a theme park in Shanghai, giving
the world's largest media company access to consumers in mainland China's
richest city." The Disney park will cost nearly $4 billion. Nothing
says middle income consumers more than Disney. The Disney park is
both a sign of positive direction within the government, and the potential
of China's future.
Global Agri-Food system, however, may not be ready
for the consumption that follows income growth in Asia. A presumption
that globally the Agri-Food system would persist in a long supply condition
may be an error. Little attention has been given to the rising demand for
food arising globally. Further, inadequate attention
has given to the weakening of the supply potential of the global Agri-Food
system. Analysis still focuses mistakenly on single grains as if they
exist in isolation.
Our first chart this week, below, is part of an effort to help investors understand
that supply is only relevant when compared to demand. In that chart are the
months of consumption in storage on a global basis for the major Agri-Food
grains and vegetable oil. These estimates come from the diligent researchers,
economists, and statisticians at the U.S. Department of Agriculture(USDA).
Each of those bars represents the USDA's estimate of ending stocks for this
crop year relative to expected consumption. For example, less than 2 months
of global corn consumption will be in storage at the end of this crop year.
For rice, a little more than 2 months of global consumption will be in storage.
These statistics are not the lowest that have been experienced. However,
both are far lower than the historical experience or that which would provide
a comfortable margin of food adequacy.

Globally, the food balances in the "bank" are extremely
low. The damage to the rice crops and rice in storage in India and the
Philippines, as well as damage to the Arkansas crop, may already be tipping
rice into a less than adequate supply situation. As the above statistic for
rice is on a global basis, it does not portray the situation within individual
nations. If the global average is only two months, some nations have less
and some, such as Thailand and Vietnam, have more. As rice is not made in
a factory, only the next crop year can eradicate any unmet needs.
Agri-Food, aside from not being made in a factory, has another important characteristic
that should be understood. In many ways, the global Agri-Food situation is
like a giant Rubik's Cube. If rice is not in adequate supply, then wheat may
be used as a substitute. So, while wheat may currently looks plentiful, as
the world pushes on the other side of the cube the adequate supply of wheat
becomes less than adequate.
Most interesting is the level of vegetable oils in stock relative to consumption. Less
than one month of the world's consumption of vegetable oil exists. That
estimate includes the full range of vegetable oils, from palm oil to peanut
oil to canola oil. The available global stockpile of vegetable oil may have
reached the minimum acceptable level. To increase
the amount of vegetable oil available more grains would need to be crushed,
which would reduce the availability of important grains from corn to soybeans
to rapeseed. Remember the Rubik's Cube.

This author is not predicting a global food shortage, nor a Malthusian disaster. What
is being predicted is that the global Agri-Food supply-demand balance is
and will be far tighter than many expect. Prices for Agri-Food will be
the first beneficiaries of this situation. Other beneficiaries will be those
that produce Agri-Food and those that serve the entire supply chain for Agri-Food.
Some investors have already been harvesting some of the benefits of this
situation.
Our second chart, above, compares the estimated return on a basket of Agri-Food
stocks to the S&P 500. After being pummeled in the collapse of the 2008
hedge fund induced mania in commodities, Agri-Food stocks have recovered substantially.
The projected global collapse in commodities, including Agri-Food, simply did
not happen.
Strong performance of the Agri-Food stocks has removed the gross under valuation
that existed in early 2009. However, the global and structural Agri-Food cycle
is still in infancy. Growth in Chinese incomes will propel global Agri-Food
demand for almost another decade. Sometime before then the awakening of India's
economy will become a strong factor. The Agri-Food sector
as an investment theme has another decade ahead for investors to benefit.
Disney's announcement of a Chinese theme park should serve as a strong signal
to investors that China's economic potential is real. Yes, disruptions may
occur, but the secular trend is not likely to be disturbed. Agri-Food
sector is perhaps one of the best ways to participate in the ramifications
of China's economic growth. Further, Agri-Food may possess the equivalent
of a call option on the Indian economy. Consumption of Agri-Food by 1.3+ billion
Chinese consumers and 1+ billion Indian consumers has little forecast risk,
for eat they will as their incomes expand. To begin your Agri-Food research
use this link: http://home.att.net/~nwschmidt/Order_AgriValueRECENT.html
The response to the release of 3rd Annual U.S. Agricultural
Land As An Investment Portfolio Consideration, 2009 is much appreciated.
This work is the definitive annual study of the role of U.S. agricultural
land in an investment portfolio. It is a rigorous statistical analysis
suitable for the sophisticated investor. The 60 page PDF file is delivered
via email, and is available at the following link: http://home.att.net/~nwschmidt/OrderAgriLand2009.html
AGRI-FOOD THOUGHTS is from Ned W.
Schmidt,CFA,CEBS, publisher of The Agri-Food Value
View, a monthly exploration of the Agri-Food grand cycle being created
by China, India, and Eco-energy. To receive this publication, use this link: http://home.att.net/~nwschmidt/Order_AgriValue.html
|