|
It seems that the primary qualification needed by any chairman of the Federal
Reserve is the ability to never admit error, no matter how damning the evidence.
During his tenure on the job, Alan Greenspan set the standard for implausible
deniability. But in a speech last weekend in Atlanta, current chairman Ben
Bernanke did the Maestro one better. In a tortured academic dissertation, Bernanke
explicitly denied any Fed culpability for inflating the housing bubble and
for the financial crisis that began when it burst. Despite his best efforts,
no one seemed particularly convinced. By taking such an absurd stand, he has
destroyed any credibility he may have had left.
In his presentation to the National Economic Club, Bernanke claimed that ultra-low
interest rates in the early in the Bush years were appropriate given the conditions
at the time, and that they therefore did not a contribute to the housing bubble.
Instead, he laid blame squarely at the feat of an "under-regulated" financial
sector which had designed and sold unconventional and exotic mortgage products,
such as adjustable-rate and interest-only mortgages. According to Ben, it was
these irresponsible lenders (who he now hopes to regulate), not low interest
rates, that caused the housing bubble.
There are two huge flaws in this line of reasoning. First, if these mortgages
were such a problem, why didn't the Fed do something to rein in their use?
When given an opportunity to speak about the widespread use of ARMs in congressional
testimony, former chairman Greenspan had nothing but praise for these products.
He claimed these offerings allowed savvy homebuyers to save money and better
manage their personal balance sheets. At the time that Greenspan made these
statements, Bernanke was serving as a Fed governor. From neither that position
nor his later role as chairman of President Bush's Council of Economic Advisors
did Bernanke ever utter a scornful phrase about the mortgages he now condemns
in hindsight.
The biggest issuers and insurers of ARMs were Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Both of these Government Sponsored Entities (GSE's) had policies that allowed
for borrowers to qualify based solely on their ability to meet the initial
loan payments, not the higher payments that would eventually kick in. Why didn't
the Fed advise Congress to force the GSE's to adopt more prudent standards?
Either they did not recognize these mortgages as problematic, in which case
they are incompetent, or they did and remained silent, which is worse. In either
case, if they lacked the foresight or political will to prevent this crisis,
how can we expect them to protect us from the next?
Furthermore, is it really possible that Bernanke is so clueless that he does
not see the relationship between the proliferation of ARMs and interest-only
mortgages and the low short-term interest rates that made them so popular?
Without the ultra-low interest rates provided by the Fed, the vast majority
of these problem mortgages never would have been originated. ARMs and interest-only
mortgages existed well before the housing bubble began; however, it wasn't
until the Fed cut rates to historically low levels in 2002, and held them there
through 2005, that they became so popular.
The only reason so many people were able to overpay for houses was because
of the temporarily low "introductory" rates. Had the Fed not set interest rates
so low, these options would not have been available, and house prices would
have been held in check. In short, by keeping interest rates too low, the Fed
inflated the housing bubble by enabling banks to issue mortgages that made
overpriced houses seem affordable.
Bernanke also blames lenders for making the false assumption that real estate
prices would always rise. However, he neglects to point out that he made the
very same mistake. While it is true that many lenders did make this foolish
assumption, they did so under the influence of all the cheap money supplied
by the Fed. Had they not made so many trips to the Fed's punch bowl, they would
have exercised much better judgment. However, the Fed itself can make no such
excuse.
As proof that the Fed caused the housing bubble, I offer a commentary that
I wrote in May of 2004 and which was published as an opinion piece in the Orange
County Register.
You can read the entire commentary here.
However, let me reproduce some key quotes:
That so many are currently opting for ARMs reflects a level of real estate
speculation unparalleled in American history. Homebuyers have been lured
into this foolish choice by... a Fed chairman desperate to keep the real
estate bubble inflating. Unfortunately, the longer the Fed remains "patient" with
regard to raising short-term interest rates to appropriate levels, the
more homeowners that will be lured into the ARM time bomb.
The real losers in this whole fiasco are likely to be those who did not
even participate in the mania. As over-leveraged borrowers walk away from
properties in which they have no equity, the Fed will most likely attempt
to bail out both debtors and bank depositors (and the government sponsored
enterprises that insured the loans) with the most inflationary monetary
policy ever undertaken in the history of central banking. The savings of
an entire generation will be wiped out, as it will have been squandered
to perpetuate the biggest real estate and consumer debt bubbles of all
time.
Now if I could have seen that coming as early as May 2004, why couldn't the
Fed? Even with the full benefit of hindsight, Bernanke still cannot recognize
the Fed's mistakes. Of course, as there is a campaign underway to expand the
Fed's regulatory authority, anyone expecting an honest assessment from its
chairman and chief lobbyist simply does not understand politics.
While denying the obvious, Bernanke is now pursuing an even more reckless
monetary policy than the one that created the housing bubble. The consequences
this time will be even more devastating, and you can take that to the bank.
For a more in-depth analysis of our financial problems and the inherent dangers
they pose for the U.S. economy and U.S. dollar, read Peter Schiff's 2008 bestseller "The
Little Book of Bull Moves in Bear Markets" and his newest release "Crash
Proof 2.0: How to Profit from the Economic Collapse." Click
here to learn more.
More importantly, don't let the great deals pass you by. Get an inside view
of Peter's playbook with his new Special Report, "Peter Schiff's Five Favorite
Investment Choices for the Next Five Years." Click
here to dowload the report for free. You can find more free services for
global investors, and learn about the Euro Pacific advantage, at www.europac.net.
|