|
Two surveys recently released showed that the manufacturing sector continued
to expand in May and will likely remain robust in the coming months. Last week,
the Chicago PMI jumped 4.1 points to 68 in May. This was the strongest reading
since July 1988. The increase was led by faster growth in production (up 6.3
to 71.1), new orders (up 9.3 to 74.4), prices paid (up 3.9 to 80), and employment
(up 3.9 to 54.8). The rate of growth slowed in backlog (down 0.6 to 56.9),
inventory (down 7.0 to 52.6), and supplier deliveries (down 0.9 to 68.8).
The national survey from the Institute of Supply Managers painted a similar
picture. Although the headline number rose only 0.4 points and six of the ten
sub-indexes declined, the survey showed that the momentum in the manufacturing
sector continued to build. Seven of the ten sub-indexes remained above 60.
Inventories continued to show contraction, customer inventories dropped 3.5
points in May to the lowest level since it was added to the survey in September
2001. The employment sub-index rose 4.1 points to 61.9, a 31-year high.
Construction spending increased more than economists expected in April. Additionally,
March spending was revised higher. While residential spending showed the largest
dollar increase ($6.2 million or 1.2%), lodging and health care both increased
over 5%. On a year-over-year basis, residential spending increased 16.7%. Office
construction spending showed the third consecutive month of a year-over-year
gain. The office market appears to have stabilized, but far below the level
of the late 1990s.
A few homebuilders released their net orders data this week that was consistent
with the construction spending data. KB Home announced that second quarter
net orders increased 28%. Lennar's results were not as impressive, but still
rose 17% during the second quarter. Hovnanian net new contracts jumped 45%,
with the dollar volume surging 62%. The average price of a home that a contract
was signed vaulted 12.4% to $301,421 since the second quarter last year. The
largest was 27.9% in the West with the Southwest region experiencing a 10.4%
decline.
After poor auto sales for most of this year, car lots were overflowing with
inventory. Automakers increased the incentives, which propelled auto sales
in May. Auto sales rebounded strongly in May to a 17.8 million annualized rate,
the fastest rate since August 2003. The average incentives increased 5.4% in
May from April according to CNW/Marketing Research. GM continued to have the
highest incentive at $4,322, but had the smallest increase, only 0.8%. Chrysler
was only $1 behind at $4,321, up from $4,201 in April. Ford increased its incentives
the most of the Big Three, up 4.3% to $4,297. While substantially below the
domestic automakers, the Japanese automakers are starting to beef up their
incentives. Toyota offered an average of $2,982, 13% more than last month.
Honda raised incentives by 14% to $1,773 and Nissan increased incentives by
15% to $1,855. Besides manufacturer incentives, dealers added $1,509 on average.
GM announced it will offer as much as $5,000 rebates on 2004 models for customers
that already own on a GM vehicle.
Table below uses actual sales results for May. Some manufactures adjust their
results based on the number of selling days in the month. This year there was
one less selling day, so several manufactures reported slightly different results.
| Automaker |
Year-over-Year Change |
Notes |
| Nissan |
+23.6% |
|
| Mazda |
+19.1% |
|
| Kia |
+15.6% |
|
| Lexus |
+13.9% |
Best month ever |
| Hyundai |
+10.4% |
|
| Honda |
+9.8% |
Best May sales ever |
| BMW |
+8.8% |
Best month ever |
| Toyota |
+8.4% |
Best month ever |
| GM |
+2.8% |
Truck sales +11.3% |
| DaimlerChrysler |
+1.3% |
|
| Volkswagen |
+0.5% |
|
| Ford |
-2.8% |
|
| Mercedes-Benz |
-5.4% |
|
| Jaguar |
-7.9% |
|
| Volvo |
-9.9% |
|
| Porsche |
-12.2% |
|
| Audi |
-12.5% |
|
| Subaru |
-13.1% |
|
| Saab |
-17.9% |
|
| Mitsubishi |
-23.4% |
|
| Land Rover |
-25.0% |
|
Foreign automakers again took market share again this month. Market share
has eroded to 59.2% for the three domestic automakers. This is the second lowest
market share for the Big Three, second only to August 2003, when Toyota overtook
Chrysler for the number three spot.
Ford announced that it has not seen a "dramatic shift in buying patterns" due
to the higher price of gasoline. However, A survey conducted by Harris Interactive
and Kelley Blue Book Marketing Research found a different result. According
to the survey, 22% of car buyers have already changed their mind on what vehicle
they would purchase next. Additionally, Jeremy Anwyl, COO of Edmunds.com, said
that consumer interest in smaller SUVs has increased on its site and predicts
that there will be a substantial shift away from the large SUVs if gasoline
prices remain at these levels.
The auto industry still has the looming problem of car buyers having negative
equity. This is one of the main reasons the automakers are increasing incentives
instead of lowering the price. The incentives are used to pay-down the existing
loan, then the new loan is for the price of the new vehicle. Sometimes the
new loan is even greater than the price of the car if the buyer owed more than
the rebate could cover. Jerry Reynolds, managing partner of Prestige Ford and
owner of two other dealerships in Dallas, was quoted in a recent Dallas Morning
News story, 'Upside-down'
drivers make industry dizzy, "But customers need that money [incentives]
to put with their trade. Without incentives we can't trade with anybody." One
on Reynolds' dealerships, Prestige Ford, conducted a survey that revealed that
81% of its customers were upside down by an average of almost $4,000.
The incentive spree that started after September 11, have pulled forward purchases
and the automakers have refused to face the day of reckoning. Instead, they
just keep piling on more incentives to maintain sales volumes. Even George
Pipas, sales analysis manager at Ford, said that the incentives pulled forward
about one million sales. He also said that, "If you don't view this as a concern
now, you will have to double incentives in future years. Right now, today's
incentives take care of the negative equity. But it's not a situation you want
to have five or ten years from now." When the automakers decide to cut back
on the incentives it is likely that sales will drop dramatically. A drop in
auto sales will have larger ramifications throughout the manufacturing sector,
which has benefited from higher production levels.
|