|
The obvious big news for the week is the 25 basis point cut. Will the eleventh
consecutive cut for a total of 4.75%, influence companies to increase capital
expenditures or reverse the slowing of consumer spending. Unfortunately, this
is unlikely for several reasons. The Financial Times carried several articles
featuring a research paper from investment house HSBCs. The paper states
there are four factors that will lead to a slow, weak recovery. The first is
that there is little reason for corporate America to start investing in capital
investments. There is too much idle capacity and profits have fallen every
year since 1997. The world economy is heading for recession as well and will
not be able to offer any assistance. In light of falling tax revenues and stepped
up security and defense spending, the government will not be able to offer
a meaningful stimulus package, without raising fears of deficit spending. Lastly,
the consumer tapped themselves out and will likely start retrenching as layoffs
mount. This of course would push the economy deeper into recession and could
start a cycle that would difficult to control.
The research paper also noted the difference between planned and unplanned
recessions. HSBC defines a planned recession as one where vigorous steps are
taken to combat inflation, like the early 1980s recession. Conversely,
an unplanned recession are associated with collapsing private sector
expectations for economic growth and profits and, from a policy perspective,
are very difficult to turn around. The 1959 version of Alan Greenspan
thought something very similar:
"Once stock prices reach the point at which it is hard to value them
by any logical methodology, stocks will be bought as they were in the late
1920s not for investment, but to be unloaded at a still higher price.
The ensuing break could be disastrous because panic psychology cannot be
summarily altered or reversed by easy-money policies."
The younger and wiser Greenspan eludes to how during the boom, investor expectations
about the future of the economy and corporate profits become inflated. Rising
asset prices leads to rising consumer confidence, which when left unchecked
leads investors to feel bulletproof. These inflated assets are then leveraged
upon. Once expectations are reduced there is a shift again by investors and
corporations to rebalance their finances, which stunts policy-lead attempts
at stimulating the economy.
Also this week, several economists pointed to the largest drop in inventories
in 19 years as proof that the excesses are being worked off. The only problem
is sales fell even more. Inventories dropped 1%, following a 0.4% decline in
September, but sales fell 1.4% in October, following a 1.2% decline in September.
Sales were weaker than the inventory reduction almost across the board. Computer
equipment inventories fell 3.2%, but sales fell 3.7%. Inventory of machinery
fell only 0.1%, while sales fell 5.3%
Car rental companies need to go and retake Econ 101. Several of the car rental
agencies are increasing their rate because demand is down from the reduction
in business travel. Im not sure how higher prices stimulate demand. Hertz
was the first to raise its rates, about 10% for daily rates and 26% for its
weekly rates and has a 14% jump for weekend rates planed for next month. Rental
agencies have also reduced their fleets by 20%-25% due to the lower business
travel. Now they hope the industry has an inelastic demand curve. I would hate
for it to have the reverse effect and curtail more business travel. The car
rental agencies are forecasting to when a recovery happens and their fleets
are smaller they will have more pricing power than they did before the slowdown.
This brings up a point in the inflation / deflation debate. Companies realized
they over-invested and now are reducing capacity by 20%, 25% or more. After
experiencing this painful lesson, they will be much more cautious adding back
capacity when the recovery does takes root. With demand and supply in much
greater balance, companies might be able to gain pricing power. Of course this
would lead to a greater risk of inflation in consumer goods when a recovery
starts to materialize.
Health-care is proving to be the most inflationary force in the economy. A
survey from the William M. Mercer Inc. reveals it is only getting worse with
no end in sight. The survey indicates the average cost of health-care benefits
rose 11.2% in 2001. Companies are responding to the increases by passing along
more of the cost to their employees. Increasing the deductible is one of the
easiest ways to lower health care costs, and the median deductible doubled
in 2001 to $500. The largest previous jump was only $50. Health care costs
are expected to continue. Blaine Bos, the chief author of he survey, said, Were
going to be looking at a period of about four years of double-digit inflation. These
increases will not only hurt small companies, but large companies that are
tied to union contracts are stuck covering the increase. This is yet another
straw on the camels back for corporate profitability and consumer expenditures.
The advertising industry has been hurt by companies trimming discretionary
cost. During the third quarter, the decline in advertising spending accelerated
for the second time to 12.2%. This follows declines of 5.2% and 6.6% in the
first and second quarters, respectively. National newspapers have been hit
the hardest, 21.5% decline year-to-date from last years levels. Some companies
are slashing ad spending. GM cut ad spending by 28.4%, Philip Morris by 20.6%,
and Schwab by 35%.
Ill just quickly mention that retail sales continue to prove lackluster.
The International Council of Shopping Centers reported sales at mall-based
specialty retailers fell 4.6% during the second week of the holiday shopping
season compared to last year.
|