|
Folks who make a habit of charting commodities, equities and indexes generally
do so with the underlying premise that history tends to repeat itself. Whether
or not history does in fact repeat itself or the degree to which past events
enable us to predict future events I personally find debatable. One might surmise
the very fact that so many people/traders follow and practice this discipline
that markets are highly susceptible to manipulation by any entity with 'deep
enough pockets.' In the case of financial markets, when someone has the
ability to administer unlimited stimulus (credit/money creation) and knows
how people will react to it, I suspect they are most susceptible to losing
their objective oversight. In its most depraved forms oversight gone amok is
akin to sheep herding. It should never be forgotten that 'herding' has
been used throughout time by different races as a means of hunting or killing
prey by literally running large numbers of animals over cliffs. I do firmly
believe in one's ability to perceive events unfolding in a fluid situation,
connect a few dots and make logical and predictive assumptions regarding future
events. This type of analysis tends to be more based in the "if it looks,
talks, swims and walks like a duck - darn good chance it's a duck
approach."
Many years ago there existed an advanced society. They didn't have SUV's
or Play Stations but Romans were technologically and most would say culturally
superior to virtually all societies of their time. They were expansionist as
evidenced by their 'empire' and they thought themselves as being
superior to many 'barbaric' cultures as evidenced by their teachings
of their ways and culture in many far flung reaches of their empire. They were
truly the enlightened ones simply trying to plant their enlightened seeds around
their known world. Occasionally, their well intentioned colonialism met nationalist
resistance and even led to difficulties like wars. The Romans always took solace
though that they were doing the right thing and would ultimately make the world
a better place.
Along the way to universal bliss and global enlightenment something happened.
The Roman Empire fell. So what happened? I would contend that the first thing
that happened was Romans got very used to living the good life. Got so comfortable
no one could imagine "not living" the good life - it was
always that way for Romans after all. The next thingy that happened, I would
contend, is that the currency was debased. They didn't have a Federal
Reserve. They were on a gold/silver standard back then but had unscrupulous
operators with a nasty habit of mixing cheaper metal with gold and silver to 'make
their money go a little further'. This is affectionately known as creating
money out of thin air. It was so easily justified because they were Romans
after all - with armies, appetites and expansionist tendencies. These things
cost money! The next thing, which might be the most critical in my humble opinion,
virtually nobody saw it coming. They didn't exactly have a financial
press or corporately owned media saying everything was always great. It was
simply heresy to even mention such a thing as the Roman Empire falling, especially
if you were a Roman. There were no organizations like GATA but the very few
that even questioned the status quo were castigated and labeled as outcasts.
Nobody wanted to live in such a world.
I know it sounds completely ridiculous - that an advanced race like
the Romans could have not seen their own demise sneaking up on them? What could
they possibly have been doing that such obvious tell tales went unnoticed?
I've read a little bit about this - I mean what the Romans were
busy doing while the Empire was busy falling. There were no White House Interns
back then but diversions of the time largely centered on entertainment (gladiators
and promiscuity) and consumption of alcohol (really just another form of entertainment).
Sound familiar? It seems that the citizenry were either too drunk or were simply
willing dupes and unaware that their currency was being debased right under
their noses. They too had a strong (not so sure about flexible) dollar policy - and
everyone knew it. The military never questioned the expansionist ways; they
had prestige, reaped the rewards of plunder and had comrades back home with
an insatiable thirst for consumption. They were Romans after all! Quite a party
the Romans threw eh? No one could party quite like them. Well, one night the
Romans all went to sleep really late (and drunk as skunks as usual) and when
they woke up the next morning they were utterly astounded to learn that, in
their drunkenness, they had burned the frikkin joint down! There was nothing
left but ashes. All their worldly possessions literally 'went up in smoke'.
Expansionism and a far flung empire went out the window and the armies quickly
disbanded - they needed to get real jobs so they could eat.
So what are the odds that history repeats itself? Perhaps it's a crapshoot
at best. Empirically, one might argue that a great deal of sheeple have been
herded to the cliff's edge. Sure looks like a long drop to the rocks
below from up here.
|