|
Since its last major low in 1998 at $ 12 (when the Economist published a very
bearish piece about oil), crude oil prices have climbed to around $50 at present.
The question, therefore, arises whether oil prices are headed for a sharp fall,
as most analysts seem to think, or whether far higher prices could become reality
in the years to come (see figure 1).
Over the last two years we have repeatedly explained how rising demand for
oil in Asia would likely lead to higher prices - this especially because we
took the view that the oil producing countries in the world were unlikely to
be in a position to increase their production meaningfully. At $50, one might,
however, be tempted to think that oil prices are substantially over-bought
- certainly from a near term perspective - and ready to decline again. Therefore,
I have noted that numerous market participants have been shorting oil futures
in the hope of a sharp fall.
I do agree that near term oil prices might succumb to some profit taking.
Bullish consensus runs above 80% and oil has become a popular topic of discussion
in the media and at every investment conference I attend. Moreover, the US
administration could decide to sell oil from its strategic reserve, which currently
exceeds 630 million barrels. Thus to sell daily 2 million barrels into the
market amounting in total to 120 million barrels over a two months period would
be an option if prices continued to soar. Also, since Chinese oil imports were
up so far in 2004 by more than 40%, I suspect that some inventory accumulation
also occurred in the Middle Kingdom. Therefore, if the Chinese suddenly decided
to curtail their oil imports the same way they stopped buying soybeans in March
2004 - an event which led to an almost 50% decline in prices - prices could
come under some near term violent pressure! Still, I maintain the view that
we may see sometime in future far higher prices than anybody envisions.
Figure 1: Crude Oil Future (Daily Chart)

Source: Credit Suisse Private Banking
First of all, if we look at oil prices in real terms - that is oil prices
adjusted for inflation - the real prices is right now still about 50% lower
than it was at its January 1980 peak (see figure 2). In fact, oil is now not
much higher than it was in the early 1970s, when the last big oil bull market
got underway.
Figure 2

Source: Gavekal Research
But, what is important to understand is that whereas the 1970 oil price increases
were coming from a supply shock, which was driven by OPEC cutting its production
all the while large production excess capacities existed, the current oil bull
market is purely a function of increased demand coming principally from Asia
at a time global oil production has practically no spare capacity which could
lead to much higher production than the current 80 million barrels per day.
So, whereas we can say that the 1970s oil shock was "event driven", today's
oil price increase is structural in nature. Specifically the current demand
driven oil bull market is fueled by the incremental demand coming from the
industrialization of China and the rising standards of living around Asia,
which increase the population of energy using consumer durables such as motorcycles,
air-conditioners, and cars very rapidly. Just consider that China's car population
has more than doubled since 2002 and that it is up tenfold since 1994! Thus,
as mentioned above, oil imports of China have risen by 40% so far in 2004.
And while I certainly do not believe that Chinese oil imports will rise every
year by 40%, it is equally unlikely that oil imports into China will ever decline
again meaningfully. In fact, if we look at what happened to per capita oil
consumption during phases of industrialization in the US between 1900 and 1970,
we see that per capita consumption rose from one barrel per year to around
28 barrels. In the case of Japan's industrialization between 1950 and 1970
and South-Korea's between 1965 and 1990, per capita oil consumption rose from
one barrel to 17 barrels (see figure 3).
Figure 3: Oil demand in Phases of Industrialization

Source: Barry Bannister, Legg Mason
In the case of China, oil demand per capita is still only 1.7 barrels per
year, and for India it has only reached 0.7 barrels. By comparison Mexico consumes
annually about 7 barrels of oil per capita and the entire Latin American continent
around 4.5 barrels. Therefore, starting from such a low base, oil consumption
in Asia will, in my opinion, double in the next ten to 15 years from currently
20 million barrels per day to around 40 million barrels per day (see figure
4). Remember also, that if China's per capita oil consumption went to the level
of Mexico's per capita consumption China would consume 24 million barrels of
oil daily, which would be close to 30% of global production. And since it is
most unlikely that current total global oil production of 80 million barrels
per day can be increased much - in fact, it may begin to decline because no
major oil field has been discovered since 1965 - I expect that prices will
increase further in future - possibly far more than anyone is now expecting.
I would, therefore, be very careful when shorting oil and would rather use
any weakness, as a buying opportunity.
Figure 4: Crude Oil Demand in Asia

Lastly, I do concede that if oil prices tumbled to say USD $ 40 or possibly
even $ 35, equities around the world might well rally temporary (in fact equities
would rally in anticipation of such a decline). However, if I am right that
in future oil prices could rise much further than is generally expected, geopolitical
tension would likely increase dramatically, as countries such as the US and
China would increasingly become concerned about adequate supplies. And, in
the case that oil prices were to rise in real terms to their 1980s highs -
well over US$ 100 (see figure 2) - then the foundation for World War Three
would be laid and most certainly begin to weight heavily on equity prices for
which I cannot share the prevailing widespread optimism anyway. Financial stocks
have begun to weaken and this is an indication that something is not quite
right!
|
Regards,
Marc Faber
GloomBoomDoom.com
Dr Marc Faber is editor of the Gloom
Boom & Doom Report and the author of "Tomorrows
Gold".
Dr Faber is a contrarian. To be a good contrarian, you
need to know what you are contrary about. It helps to be a world class economic
historian, to have been a trader and managing director of Drexel Burnham Lambert
when the firm was the junk bond king of Wall Street, to have lived in Hong
Kong for a quarter of a century, and to have a contact book crammed with the
home numbers of many of the movers and shakers in the financial world.
Famous for his approach to investing, Marc Faber does not
run with the bulls or bait the bears but steers his own course through the
maelstrom of international finance markets. In 1987 he warned his clients to
cash out before Black Monday on Wall Street. He made them handsome profits
by forecasting the burst in the Japanese Bubble in 1990. He correctly predicted
the collapse in US gaming stocks in 1993; and he foresaw the Asia-Pacific financial
crisis of 1997/98 and the resulting global volatility.
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2008
SafeHaven.com
« BullionVault.com
-- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money:
A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo »
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|