|
In a speech this summer to a credit union conference, Mr. Greenspan reiterated
that the balance sheets of American households are generally in "good shape." With
personal and corporate debt levels in the U.S. running at unprecedented [some
would argue unsustainable] levels, fueled only by currency debasing historic
low rates of interest Mr. Greenspan insists that everything is ok? While trying
to get my head around this exaltation I cannot help but wonder how much disdain
this elitist man must have for us commoners. With the tone of the man's utterances
I get the distinct feeling that we're all being talked down to-like we all
don't 'get it.' Maybe he's right. Perhaps we're too naïve and truly don't
'get it.'
Perhaps we've finally made it to the Emerald City and we truly are standing
before the wise and omnipotent wizard of Oz? Perhaps unprecedented debt levels
don't matter? Perhaps foreigners will fund unprecedented and unlimited amounts
of American debt and conspicuous consumerism indefinitely? Somehow I doubt
this is truly the case. I am deeply suspicious that this story does not have
a very happy ending. I also feel queasy that the man/men behind the curtain
pushing and pulling all the levers is/are really not a very good wizard[s]
at all.
You see folks, the kind of inflation [monetary debasement] we are currently
experiencing amounts to government sanctioned theft - and remember, it's only
sanctioned because it is government that is doing the stealing. Historically,
inflation is measured in the economy in much the same way noxious fumes are
meant to be detected by a canary in mine. In the mining sense, the death of
the canary notifies unwary miners that air quality is unfit for human consumption.
In the case of the economy, PPI [producer price index], precious metals prices
and CPI [consumer price index] are generally regarded as the primary gauges
of inflation. Big upside moves in any of these is a harbinger of imminent inflation.
PPI is or used to be released every month at the same time. This index by
and large measures inputs or raw materials that go into the manufacture of
consumer goods. Reporting of the PPI has been delayed by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics no less than 2 times thus far this year. On one occasion we were
told that data gathered was "unfit" for consumption? I ask, does this not sound
eerily familiar [perhaps toxic]? On the other occasion we were told that government
computer obsolescence rendered computers unable to perform a "new method" of
calculating the data set. You will have to excuse me, dear reader, for my reluctance
to accept the notion that "new" or "improved" [when it relates to the manner
in which governments ultimately measure their liabilities] doesn't really mean
more as in "usurious."
In more than 20 years around financial markets I have never known PPI to be
delayed like this. I can say with clear conscience that a great many base materials
and inputs that one would normally associate with PPI have recently undergone
unprecedented price increases. Reporting of much higher producer prices would
not only increase costs/obligations of government but be highly inconsistent
with the Fed's low interest rate policy we are currently experiencing.
Sharply rising precious metals prices have traditionally signaled inflationary
pressures building in the economy. In response to rising inflation, prudent
central bankers generally raise interest rates to quell demand for goods thus
slowing the economy and enticing would be consumers to save. By capping the
prices of precious metals [gold and silver] with derivatives or through outright
gold sales [or leases that amount to the same thing], a central bank would
mask a critical telltale symptom of rising inflation.
When the consumer price index is reported each month the financial markets
largely react to the headline number-which is most often reported or referred
to in the financial press. A more thorough examination of the published number
one generally finds a 'statement of confession,' which can usually be found
in the footnotes to the number. The footnotes are seldom reported in the mainstream
press. The footnotes to a recent CPI release contained the following confession:
"Extreme values and/or sharp movements which might distort the seasonal
pattern are estimated and removed from the data prior to calculation of
seasonal factors... For the fuel oil, natural gas, motor fuels, and educational
books and supplies indexes, this procedure was used to offset the effects
that extreme price volatility would otherwise have had on the estimates
of seasonally adjusted data for those series. For the Nonalcoholic beverages
index, the procedure was used to offset the effects of labor and supply
problems for coffee. The procedure was used to account for unusual butter
fat supply reductions, decreases in milk supply, and large swings in soybean
oil inventories affecting the Fats and oils series. For the Water and sewerage
maintenance index, the procedure was used to account for a data collection
anomaly and dry weather in California. For Dairy products, it mitigated
the effects of significant changes in milk production levels and higher
demand for cheese. For Electricity, it was used to offset an increase in
demand due to warmer than expected weather, increased rates to conserve
supplies, and declining natural gas inventories. For New vehicles, New
cars, and New trucks, the procedure was used to offset the effects of a
model changeover combined with financing incentives."
In essence, this confession amounts to an admission - that anything that goes
up in price is essentially excluded from the Bureau of Labor Statistics measure
of CPI.
So where does it all end-I'm not exactly sure? Maybe we'll all muster up the
courage or find the heart or come to the conclusion through some good old-fashioned
smarts that the wizard must be confronted? While the allure of a system awash
in artificially cheap credit has produced an ether-induced giddiness and complacency
- I do pinch myself as a reminder that we all live in places a lot like Kansas.
Funny thing - in Kansas there really are no yellow brick roads or good or bad
witches. But seemingly we have been cursed with an abundance of extremely lousy
huckster wizards.
The canaries in the coal mine [PPI, precious metals prices and CPI] have been
removed from the equation altogether or rendered ineffective by manipulation.
With the advent of hedonic taxidermy, the canaries we can see are of little
more use than hood ornaments. The fact that the canaries have all been removed
from the mine tells me we're in a very dangerous place and it's highly likely
that the end is perilously close at hand. Although no one in the mainstream
[Wall Street subsidized] media wishes to tell us this story, I managed to figure
this much out on my own.
|