|
Backdraft...In our September discussion, we questioned whether the US consumer would be
able to continue along the consumption path in support of the economy in relatively
undeterred fashion ahead. Little did we know at the time that the horrifically
tragic events of September 11 would be right around the corner. We have seen
many a pundit point to the World Trade Center incident as being the cause for
an economic downturn to come. We have witnessed many a corporate press release
anticipate a diminishment in future results claimed as directly related to
the WTC horror. In our minds, the fallout from the terrorist attacks are not
a cause at all, but rather an economic accelerant in the deceleration that
began at least nine to twelve months ago.
The US consumer has been witness to deteriorating stock prices for 18 months
now. The 2Q 2001 Fed Flow of Funds report released in September records the
ongoing year over year contraction in consumer net worth:
| US Consumer Year/Year Net Worth Change |
| |
2Q 2001 |
2Q 2000 |
Change |
| Financial Assets |
$32,203.6 B |
$ 34,842.1 B |
(7.6) % |
| Tangible Assets |
15,889.4 |
14,546.0 |
9.2 |
| Total Liabilities |
(7,663.9) |
(7,150.3) |
7.2 |
| Net Worth |
$ 40,429.1 |
$ 42,237.8 |
(4.3) |
Most assuredly with stock market action in 3Q, these numbers have gotten a
lot worse. In addition to the psychological effect of the financial markets,
weekly unemployment claims and layoff announcements have been dripping slow
but steady black rain on consumer spirits for the better part of the year.

Certainly, the results of this tabulation spike higher in the months ahead
given the near term impact of the economic reality seen in the air travel and
related tourism industries. Additionally, the weight of increased leveraging
of consumer balance sheets grown over years of excess consumption in coincidence
with a general decline in cash savings has been slowing the consumer more rapidly
in recent quarters. The psychological fallout of the WTC incident accelerates
the process downward.
As you know, the WTC tragedy is an immediate shock to the system. An instantaneous
stress point where there was none but a few days prior. A negative shock that
heightens emotional consumer response to future stock price movements, economic
reports and potential acts of war. Unlike many exogenous shocks of the past
that have jolted the stability of the US consumer/investor, this event comes
at a time when both macro economic reality and the general perception of that
reality are already fragile. Making it especially difficult for the domestic
consumer to stay on his or her feet. We only have to look back a little over
ten short years ago to witness the results of the external shock of Iraq invading
Kuwait:

Although much of the current consumer confidence report was completed prior
to the Sept. 11 destruction, it seems we are now and will continue to be watching
a replay of a consumer confidence reaction to an unanticipated event that is
immediate and sharp. Moreover, the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait was geographically
definable and offered a specific cast of human characters upon which to focus.
The current circumstances offer no such contextual certainty. As you can see
in the above chart, in each and every recession of the last 30 years, consumer
confidence made a pit stop below the 60 level. At a current 97.6, it's still
a long way down from here. What are the chances of seeing that level or lower
during this cycle? Pretty darn good given that the accelerant is now in place.
The Comeback Kid?...It's clearly no secret that corporate capital spending
has been in a recession, if not a modern day depression, for the last twelve
months at least. The WTC tragedy appears to be the psychological depressant
that accelerates an already downward rate of change environment for the consumer
in terms of credit growth and spending:


Economic statistics released in the last few weeks that largely cover the
period prior to September 11 have shown renewed downward economic momentum
in the late summer. It's certainly no huge leap of faith to suggest the numbers
get worse ahead. Possibly a whole lot worse. As the bear market matures, the
second act of what so far must still be characterized as a cyclical phenomenon
will be played out ahead as the consumer buckles. For our money, economic and
financial market analysis now moves on to the questions of depth and duration.
Just how deep will the current recession become and for how long will it last?
Although unknowable in advance, we would hope that an examination of current
contextual backdrop as well as the anecdotal evidence of history will allow
us to remain rational and objective in decision making ahead. From a contrarian
standpoint, it's good to see certain negative sentiment mount. But negative
sentiment alone will not mark any kind of financial or economic bottom. Historical
economic signposts of distress will be important markers ahead. A consumer
confidence number below 60, for example, will at least demand thought and potential
reassessment. We'll take it one step at a time.
Set Design... In trying to make sense of the economic and financial
drama that is to unfold ahead, it's instructive to be aware of the backdrop
against which the story will be told. Protagonists and antagonists in the cast
of players are many. It just so happens that the Fed Flow of Funds report released
a few short weeks ago is nothing short of a wealth of information regarding
the current theatrical set design. For the corporate and consumer sector, it
may not be the most opportune of times to be facing a domestic and global economic
slowdown. The credit excesses introduced into the system over the last few
decades will definitely be a hangover from which the corporate and consumer
sector will have a tough time recovering in trying to spark economic growth
ahead. The following are perspectives taken directly from the numbers found
in the Fed report:

Although it can be argued that interest costs today are lower than in recent
cycles of the last two decades, absolute dollar corporate debt relative to
the benchmark of GDP is as high today as at any time in recent history.
In like manner, relative to meaningful benchmarks, household debt is well
above past experience:


Finally, financial sector debt relative to non-financial credit obligations
(government, household and non-financial corporate) is at all time highs.

At the very least, leverage in the current system suggests that the character
of an ultimate economic recovery may be much more muted than many of the "V" experiences
of the last three or four recessionary interludes. The stage is set in rather
somber tones.
Of Hangovers And Overhangs...In addition to the credit hangover being
a potential impediment to an ultimate economic recovery growth rate, for the
financial markets the question may not be one of hangover, but rather overhang.
It is most telling in the recent consumer confidence reports that the over
age 55 crowd has been the most pessimistic. You remember, the folks set to
retire dead ahead. With approximately $6-7 trillion in stock market value having
been wiped away over the past 18 months, it's no wonder this demographic is
a bit shaky. As you may know, according to AMG data, there has been very little
in the way of equity mutual fund redemptions as of late. About $11 billion
over the period three days prior to WTC until almost month end. Although the
media touts this as significant, compared to what has been put into funds over
the last decade and the current market cap of equities, it isn't even a rounding
error. Technical indicators such as put/call, TRIN, VIX, ARMS, etc. may suggest
capitulative activity, but absolute dollar redemptions suggest something much
different. Whether the public becomes involved in wholesale selling at some
point remains an open question. What is not in question is that asset allocation
to equities among many market sector participants is still very near historical
highs. Once again, thanks to the Fed for doing the numbers for us:



Just as leverage in the system is a clear concern for the economy ahead, asset
allocation must be given attention in terms of what an ultimate economic recovery
may mean for buyers of financial assets. From a very simplistic standpoint,
we are very near all time high investment allocations to equities for both
households and institutions. Surely foreign allocation is also much closer
to the top end of the historical range. This suggests that corporate earnings
growth will be much more important to future stock prices than it may have
been over the past decade. During the 1990's, the market had earnings growth andasset
allocation as the twin afterburners of stock price levitation. It sure seems
the macro asset allocation transition is all but complete at this point.
Sugar Keynes...The WTC incident as being the accelerant applies not
only to the near term acceleration of the economic downturn for this cycle,
but also to what will be accelerated fiscal spending and monetary accommodation
on the part of the government and the central bank ahead. Clearly the Fed has
been fighting the economic deceleration battle with interest rate policy and
open market operations for nine months now to little or no avail. But it seems
obviously apparent that fiscal spending is set to kick into high gear. The
Keynesian solution, if you will.
We have heard zero talk of "saving social security" in the last
few weeks. We expect the government to have checkbook open and ready for spending
in the period ahead. And not just for the military effort. To allow the economy
to sink rapidly from here raises the risk of serious deflation possibilities.
Perhaps the unthinkable. As you know, cold war deficit spending in this country
mushroomed in the 1980's in an effort to vanquish a global threat that was
largely conceptual in nature. There was no open conflict and no violence on
American soil. Just what do you think the possibilities for deficit spending
are when innocent US lives have been lost and the perception of future risk
has grown substantially?
As a last comment for this month, what should amount to the deflationary pressure
of a slowing US consumer on both the domestic and global economies will be
met with what seems the only alternative of supercharged fiscal and monetary
policy. It also seems a sure bet that the global central bank powers that be
will also step on the gas ahead. We believe it's a fair statement that near
term forward GDP will be increasingly dependent on government spending. The
waters between the Scylla and Charybdis of reflationary and deflationary pressures
have grown more murky over the past month. Although we are not ready to pass
judgment quite yet on the eventual outcome, there is no doubt that the rocks
and whirlpool on either side of the passage are just as lethal, and navigating
the narrow strait has grown more dangerous. We expect the government to put
up one hell of a fiscal policy fight in trying to support the economy directly
ahead.
What does this mean for bonds? Although the jury is still out, the following
are perspective:



It is interesting to note that August recorded a record $16.5 billion net
inflow into bond mutual funds. Are investors arriving late to the bond party?
From a long term perspective it sure appears as much. Unless the world is truly
coming to an end ahead, it sure seems there is very little to be gained in
short maturity Treasury paper outside of capital preservation and stated coupon.
Although this certainly will not happen overnight, will the WTC incident and
its influence on accelerated monetary and fiscal accommodation sow the seeds
of future inflationary pressures? If nothing else, it's a question we certainly
intend to monitor and address ahead.
Although we are often amused at the historical repetition of human decision
making in the financial markets, we continue to be personally shocked at
the human decision making involved in man's inhumanity to man since day
one on this planet. Our deepest sympathies go out to all who have been
touched by the tragic events of September 11. Our best to you and your
families.
|