|
To say that more and more people trust government economic data less and less
is an understatement of major proportions.
The passion of the situation seems to reach a crescendo each month, just around
the time the Labor Department releases its inflation data. It would take me
considerable time to synthesize a "family friendly" version of some of the
e-mails I received yesterday from clients, "critiquing" the latest Consumer
Price Index.
We will just let it go at this. A +3.2% year-over-year CPI is a result with
which few people I know (as in "no people I know") personally identify!
In August, I asked friend and client, John Williams, if he would write a series
of articles for Gillespie Research on the growing "shortcomings" (euphemism)
of government economic data and the reporting thereof. This series appeared
under the umbrella title, "Government Economic Reports: Things You've Suspected
but Were Afraid to Ask!" I had a strong hunch this work would be well received
by our readers, which was indeed the outcome!
Instinctively, everyone knows there is something "wrong" (another euphemism)
with many if not most of the economic numbers that come from Washington, numbers
that can and do influence our lives in a major way. As one example -- a major
one, at that -- look at the adverse cumulative impact a chronically understated
Consumer Price Index can and has had on the monthly checks of millions of Social
Security recipients. Or, as another example, look at how these numbers whip
around the financial markets at given moments in time. Not to mention that
suspect data are increasingly creating material capital market distortions
of a longer-term nature.
The interest in and response to John Williams' four-part "Government Economic
Reports..." series was exceptional. This was a clear reflection of John's extensive
knowledge of this critical area, his ability to communicate effectively his
body of knowledge, and his tenacity to confront what is often a highly controversial
topic in a head-on manner.
The series put in place a good deal of information and historical perspective
on much of the hanky-panky that has crept into government data over the years.
John's latest effort expands on this, as well as specifically relating these
machinations to the most recent economic releases. It creates the first edition
of what will now be a monthly undertaking, one for which I believe there is
a significant -- and regrettably -- a growing need.
Now, read and enjoy the inaugural edition of "John Williams' Behind the Government's
Numbers" at: http://www.gillespieresearch.com/cgi-bin/bgn/article/id=378
|