Safe Haven | Preservation of Capital
"No warning can save a people determined
to grow suddenly rich." - Lord Overstone
HOME ARCHIVES FORUMS SEARCH SITE MAP ABOUT US
Home -> Archives -> Charles Meek -> Economic Problems Solved In a Comprehensive Strategy
Printer FriendlyPrinter Friendly eMail ArticleeMail Article

December 21, 2004

Economic Problems Solved In a Comprehensive Strategy
by Charles Meek







The administration has a great opportunity to, in one fell swoop, solve

  (a) the deficit problem

  (b) the Social Security problem, and

  (c) the income tax problem

The solution is so simple and so obvious, it will surely be missed. It will be missed because nobody in Washington can put three seemingly unrelated issues together in the same package (unless there is pork involved). But this is the key to success—a package deal.

Here's the concept:

  1. Freeze federal spending at current levels for every department except defense for as long as it takes to get the budget back in balance. No exceptions. Note that this does not mean that federal workers' pay cannot go up. It just means that each department has to figure out where to conserve so that they spend no more in total each year hence.

  2. Cut Social Security payments for those who do not need it. Social Security was originally designed to be a safety net for the truly needy. So perhaps, only the bottom half or bottom quarter of Americans would receive Social Security. Everybody would continue to pay into the system as they do now, but only those who find themselves in retirement at the low end of the income spectrum would receive full benefits.

  3. Institute a true flat income tax, with perhaps deductions only for charitable contributions. No gimmicks. No baloney. Ideally there would be a constitutional amendment process begun at the same time to prohibit the federal government from ever taking more than 20% of any portion of any citizen's income in federal income tax.

This plan ought to be politically feasible in that the rich would get a lower tax rate but would give up Social Security retirement income benefits. That should be a fair trade-off.

The plan would have to be scaled in over several years to protect people who have made reliances on the current system.

From an investment standpoint, this would be a boon to stocks, bonds, and the dollar. The economy would become more productive. Government would become more responsive and responsible.


Regards,

Charles Meek
MeekMarketModels.com

Mr. Meek is a Registered Investment Advisor and editor of MeekMarketModels.com.

MeekMarketModels does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this report, nor do they assume any liability for any loss that may result from reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions. Such information and opinions are subject to change without notice and are for general information only . In making any investment decision, you will rely on your own review and examination of the facts and the records relating to such investments. Trading the market is extremely risky. Our suggestions are often very speculative and not suitable for many investors. Past results are not indicative of future returns. Meek Market Models, Inc.

Copyright © 2004-2006 Charles Meek

Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2008 SafeHaven.com

« BullionVault.com -- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money: A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo »

« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please visit RSSHelp for instructions. »

 
 
Top of Page
Read ourDISCLAIMER
HOME | ARCHIVES | FORUMS | SEARCH | SITE MAP
ABOUT US | LINKS | CONTACT US
Copyright © 2000-2008 - SAFEHAVEN.com
ColdFusion by COSTAS PILIOTIS
Server Admin by DIGITAL ADMIN
SafeHaven Web Site FEEDS
Get RSS Feeds