|
Washington think tank informs us that the average annual compensation of the
top 100 chief executives amounts to an astonishing $37.5 million, which is
1000 times the pay of an average worker. The top one percent of households
reportedly earns 20 percent of all incomes and owns 33.4 percent of all net
worth. The most astonishing feature of such concentration of wealth in the
hands of a tiny elite is the utter lack of concern and comment by the American
media. They apparently find nothing wrong with such glaring inequality.
We may readily agree with the media as long as the great chasm of income and
wealth stems from great differences in economic productivity. Surely, we cannot
fault the great American entrepreneurs who in ages past built famous enterprises
employing thousands of workers and serving millions of consumers. They discovered
new methods of production, opened new markets, and developed new sources of
raw materials throughout the world. They succeeded by serving and pleasing
consumers. Their talents of enterprise actually raised American standards of
living to one of the highest in the world. And their labors bridged the wide
legal, social, and economic gulf that separated the social classes throughout
the ages.
The economic order that developed gradually during the 20th century gave life
to yet another economic and social elite which does not seek new methods of
production and does not give employment to thousands of workers; it shrewdly
speculates on the effects of various government policies, such as inflation,
credit expansion, and new regulations and controls. An economist who visits
the new elite may actually discern three distinct branches that cooperate as
readily as they feud with each other.
A large branch does not create new enterprises nor give employment to a single
worker. It opens no markets nor develops new products. Its members thrive on
boom-and-bust cycles which afford great opportunities to traders who observe
and understand the portentous policies of the Federal Reserve and the U.S.
Treasury. They may manage investment trusts holding corporate stock worth billions
of dollars or merely look after their own accounts. They weigh and appraise
political intention and government intervention, always gauging the consequences,
acting in anticipation, and profiting immensely from political moves. While
many businessmen suffer painful losses during a business cycle, they succeed
in increasing their funds throughout it all.
These speculators actually render an important service. The Federal Reserve
and the U.S. Treasury frequently intrude on and disrupt the smooth performance
of markets, which then must readjust; they actually facilitate the adjustment.
They anticipate future price movements, assume market price rick, and add liquidity
and capital to the markets. Theirs is a necessary and productive activity.
A remarkable feature of this new elite is its frequent disagreements and altercations
with the other branches of the business elite. Its members may find frequent
fault with and cast aspersions on the elite that actually manages the production.
They prefer to support and consort with the political powers that shape the
economic policies, seeking the company of well-known politicians who in turn
feel at ease with generous nouveaux riches.
Another branch of the new elite consists of chief executives whose compensation
usually comprises a base salary and incentive options. They earn million-dollar
lucre whenever the Federal Reserve blows stock market bubbles and corporate
share prices soar to lofty price-earnings ratios. During the 1990s-bubble they
pocketed hundred-million-dollar profits without any particular efforts of their
own. They created no new industries and opened no new markets. The corporations
they managed did not grow and corporate profits stagnated or even declined.
But stock prices soared and CEOs reaped much lucre at the expense of their
own stock holders. For every bubble profit taken is total worth consumed. It
waters the stock and diminishes the property of all other stockholders. To
remedy the situation, the corporation must henceforth increase its assets without
increasing its outstanding shares or reduce outstanding shares without reducing
assets. CEOs probably are aware of these implications, but few, if any, have
ever returned their bubble lucre to losing stockholders.
The most powerful elite is yet another; it springs from political power that
holds authority over the body politic. It is the natural extension of the new
economic order known by various labels such as the New Deal, the Great Society,
and other Democratic and Republican Deals. They made politics an important
vocation and elevated politicians to positions of importance and eminence.
Surely, politicians have to be ever mindful of public opinion which is shaped
by the elite of education and communication. Many master the art of political
communication and thus manage to perpetuate themselves in office. In their
footsteps their children are laboring to forge a self-perpetuating political
elite.
This country is not about to degenerate into a class-based society led by
a ruling elite. Competition is a time-honored practice, a cultural custom followed
from generation to generation. But, under the influence of collectivist ideologies,
many politicians and journalists are ever eager to strike at successful entrepreneurs
who earn much more than they do. It is difficult to ascertain their motives;
it can be simple envy which consumes many men, or it can be economic ignorance.
After all, market economics is barred from most universities and is unknown
to leading politicians and journalists. It may explain why most politicians
are ever eager to regulate industrial and commercial activity and strike at
the economic elite with confiscatory taxation. Unfortunately, regulation and
taxation tend to hamper economic activity, inhibit productivity, and depress
levels of living. But they create ever new profit opportunities for the new
economic elite.
|