This is the question being asked in the financial community. At odds are the
dollar bears, who see an imminent resumption of the decline in the U.S. dollar
index followed by lower lows. On the other side of the fence are the bulls,
who see near-term strength in the dollar and a much-needed recovery rally lasting
longer than the mere six weeks it lasted from late December until early February.
Ignoring the longer-term discussion for now, let’s focus on the short-term
outlook. In my previous forecast I accurately predicted the dollar index would
meet resistance at its 30-week moving average, which it promptly did, falling
2.00 to the current 84.46 as of Tuesday, Feb. 15.
This 30-week MA also coincided with the upper boundary of a short-term uptrend
channel so it wasn’t surprising to see the strong resistance coming in
last week at this level. Now that the dollar index has fallen off in the last
4-5 days, it’s starting to draw near the lower boundary of this uptrend
channel. This is also approximately where the 60-day moving average intersects
in the daily chart, making it a strong potential support in the near-term.
Do the odds favor the dollar shortly finding support and basically staying
within the confines of that short-term uptrend channel? I believe they do.
Below you can see the said uptrend channel along with the short-term positive
h influence of a parabolic bowl, which year-to-date has given the dollar a
little upside impetus and has kept the dollar above its 2004 lows.
From
a market psychology standpoint, there is simply too much pessimistic sentiment
against the dollar for the dollar to break down from here and resume its previous
downward trend. For instance, in a recent issue of the London Financial Times
the following headline was present: "Sustainability of dollar questioned." Whenever
the sustainability of anything in the market is questioned it usually marks
at least a short-term bottoming process that is followed by a reversal rally.
The markets has a way of making the bearish detractors look like fools whenever
they get too bearish.
The aforementioned article in the Financial Times stated, "The mood in the
market was that this was as good as it gets for the dollar, presenting the
perfect selling opportunity for those wanting to rebuild the short-dollar positions
liquidated so aggressively this year." That kind of openly bearish sentiment
does not go unnoticed by Mr. Market and it is doubtful the editors at the Financial
Times will have the satisfaction of seeing the dollar break down anytime soon.
Then there is continued talk of the U.S. trade deficit. Recent data showed
that the U.S. trade deficit narrowed more than expected to $56.4 billion in
December, "continuing a run of bullish signs for the U.S. dollar," the article
said. But the Times was quick to bring in the bearish arguments to try and
dispel this. In that same article mentioned above the Financial Times made
reference to some unnamed analysts who "questioned just how impressive the
narrowing of the trade gap...really was." The article concluded with a quote
from Michael Woolfolk at Bank of New York, who said, "The report failed to
dispel lingering doubts over any near-term improvement in the deficit."
Taking the bearish sentiment a step further, in the weekend edition of the
Financial Times of Feb. 12/13, the lead editorial for the day was headlined, "No
lasting respite for the greenback (Never mind better trade data: the dollar
has further to fall)." The editorial expanded on the bearish arguments about
the U.S. deficit and the need for "significant improvement" in the domestic
front. It offered the following advice: "...the U.S. needs to do much more
than stabilise the current account deficit: it needs to cut it, probably to
about 3 per cent of GDP, to stop net debt mounting to an unmanageable level." The
editorial concluded with these words: "To get from here to there will require
a further big change in relative prices: in other words, a further sizeable
decline in the dollar." Again, this is simply too much negative psychology
and the market has a way of feeding off this to stay afloat.
More likely for the dollar is a trading range for the next several weeks as
the Fed tries to stabilize the markets after the major imbalances of the previous
year across many sectors. A runaway, sustained declined in the dollar would
not be welcome by the Fed at this time, which is why they are doing everything
in their power to prevent it.