Introduction
Owning a home was once the foundation of the American Dream. Recently, it
seems to have become a desperate national obsession, with prospective buyers
frantically bidding up prices as though it were the end of the world. The whole
thing is eerily reminiscent of the stock market boom that started in earnest
10 years ago, and culminated in the desperate rush to own shares - any shares
- with the complete confidence that stock prices moved in only one direction.
In spite of the recent denials by Fed Chairman Greenspan and US Treasury Secretary
Snow that there is no housing bubble, the comparison of housing to stocks should
be taken quite seriously.
If there is anything that we've learned from the political and financial roller
coaster of the last decade, it is that the words of our leaders must always
be scrutinized with the fishy eye of skepticism. In early April, Greenspan
dismissed the notion that there could possibly be a national housing bubble.
This from the man, mind you, who repeatedly stated prior to the Nasdaq crack-up
that bubbles can only be seen in retrospect and that the best the Fed can hope
to do is mitigate the fallout after a collapse. His recent statement was followed
shortly thereafter by Snow, who also went on record stating that he did not
believe American housing prices were overly inflated or in the throes of a "bubble."
The problem with these denials from our so-called leaders is that their positions
of power effectively prohibit them from speaking bluntly about certain issues,
namely the economy. Their job is to soothe and reassure the public that everything
is just fine. If you understand this, then you understand that by simply addressing
the issue, they have tipped their hand and revealed that we have a problem
on our hands - a problem that they aren't quite sure what to do about. The
fact that they deny the problems means that you can pretty much bet on its
existence and its seriousness.
Just think about the lies that government leaders have been caught telling
over the past decade, and think again if you want to trust the current denials
about the housing market. You may think that to accuse the government of lying
is rather impolite. On the contrary, it is impolite to tell lies in the first
place. At the very best, they're trying to ignore the issue, obfuscate the
truth, whistle their way through the dark and get everyone else to do the same.
But if you want the truth about the issue, you're going to have to tune out
their rhetoric, look at the facts, use your brain and think for yourself.
All of this - the government lies, the asset bubbles and the ensuing destruction
of wealth - is part of the Great Transition we've been discussing in this five
part series. This Transition is silently affecting everything in the world
today. Painful as it is, an old order is crumbling away and we must adopt new
rules to deal with that reality. To understand how housing fits in to this
puzzle, first a little background on the current bubble.
Housing is Everywhere
Look around you. Housing is everywhere. It is not only the late night airwaves
that have been taken over by baby-faced millionaires who made their fortune
in real estate and are now pushing the idea onto insomniacs nationwide that "you
can, too!"
Walk into any large bookstore and you will find that the investment section
that was dominated by books on easy stock market profits five years ago has
become a treasure trove for step-by-step how-to guides on easy real estate
profits. Titles such as The Weekend Millionaire's Secrets to Investing in
Real Estate, Are You Dumb Enough to Be Rich? The Amazingly Simple Way
to Make Millions in Real Estate and dozens
more like them make it sound so easy. And it seems that everyone knows
someone who knows someone who's made a killing in the market and has three
more deals in the works. Articles on housing, individual investors, and the
state of the market are all over the popular press. All of the articles document
the recent, rapid-fire escalation of home prices that is reminiscent of the "new
economy stocks" that seemed capable only of unidirectional price increases
just five years ago.
But all of this attention is fueled by a simple, undeniable fact. Nationwide,
housing prices are rising, and they are rising fast. The market
is partying once again like its 1999, and people think it's their last chance
to buy a house, or make money on an investment, or secure their retirement,
or they don't even know what they think, they are just caught up in the grips
of the mania and they need to buy a house. There is no way that I can better
demonstrate the folly of these ideas than to look back in time to show you
a glimpse of the future.
Back to the Future
First stop, Nasdaq, December 1999. Back in those heady days they called it
the Stock Market for the Next 100 Years. December 1999 was a time of Millennial
fever, terrorist threats, the Y2K bug, but the Nasdaq shrugged it all off like
a disinterested child with something better to do. By early December, the market
had gained 50% in half a year. Nervous bulls suspected a top was near - just
as nervous investors today suspect a housing bubble, (100% of the 72 voters
in this week's website
poll believe that the market is in a bubble - they only differ on when
it will pop) - but it didn't stop many from continuing to "invest" and it didn't
stop the market from rising to heights that were, to be blunt, insane.

But instead of collapsing, the market defied all logic and began a near vertical
ascent though March that brought the Nasdaq to 5132, beyond everyone's wildest
expectations. Any sane individual who expected an end to the madness was made
to look like a fool, a pessimist, a doom-and-gloomer. The impressive performance
allowed the market to suck in more suckers by giving off the air of invincibility.

The lessons for today's housing market are simply this: Just as in the Nasdaq's
case, sane individuals are being made to look insane by this market. People
know that it's a bubble of course, but they can't seem to stay away. The temptation
to play along is just too great. A recent survey indicated that 63% of business
owners believe there is a bubble in real estate. In spite of this, 42% felt
that real estate would be the most lucrative investment in the near term, outperforming
both stocks and bonds. These numbers indicate that investors have bought into
a high-stakes game of chicken, trying to squeeze out the last few percentage
points of return before the whole market blows.
Sounds eerily like Nasdaq 1999. And now just as then, it will be impossible
to call the exact date of the top. Nothing goes up forever, and when things
start to look the craziest, we know that the hour is getting late. But this
is also when it feels the best: Everyone is drunk together, sharing in the
same collective illusion and the party is rolling along full steam ahead.

Take a look at the chart, and the date, because that was the top. March 10,
2000. How could anyone have known? It was a perfectly normal day just like
any other day. There was no extraordinary news, no plane crashes, terrorist
attacks or invasions from outer space. The biggest news of the day went unreported.
Everyone got up, went to work, watched the market go up, and then went home.
The only difference was that, unnoticed by all, the market silently put in
its top at 5,132 then like everyone else, turned around and headed for home.
Why did the market choose that day instead of March 9, or March 11? Why March,
and not February or April, and why 2000 for that matter? Why did it top after
an 86% gain in one year, and why not more, or less? There are no answers to
these questions, but there is wisdom in thinking about them. It's almost like
a Zen koan. After you have thought about it for a while, take a look at the
charts below and remember (because you already know it) that as fast as a market
can rise, it can fall even faster.


The Great Transition
So what does the Nasdaq bubble have to do with housing? All bubbles share
the common thread of irrational
exuberance. Optimism turns to greed, which then curdles, rots and spoils
the market. Everyone needs housing, but when 25% of the market is controlled
by "investors" - a polite word that the National Association of Realtors (NAR)
uses to describe real estate speculators - something has gone amiss. The NAR
states that one quarter - 25% - of all homes purchased last year were bought
as "investments." Once the speculators crash the party and turn necessities
into a game, true values are distorted and lost for the people who just want
to do something old fashioned with their home - live in it.
In economics, as in life, all the interesting activity takes place at
the margins. Twenty five percent of the market as speculators is huge.
Just think of them as the day traders of yore, adding no value but simply
pushing up prices, crowding out legitimate buyers and artificially inflating
values, squeezing out money from pure emotions. But these investors aren't
in the game for fun - their investments have to make profits. This can happen
only one of two ways, either through rents or capital appreciation. There
is evidence that rents are no longer doing the trick (it is much cheaper
to rent now than to own), so in order for the speculators to make profits,
more speculators - or legitimate buyers -- must enter the market. The greater
fool theory lives on.
But note in the Nasdaq charts above, how quickly the market can go into retreat.
Once the last marginal buyer has bought, the tide turns for no apparent reason
and there is no looking back. Selling begets more selling as "investors" rush
to lock in gains or cover their losses. As the marginal homebuyers disappear,
the dynamic of the market shifts and prices reverse. Much has been made of
the low inventory of houses on the market, and how this is "proof" that we're
not in a bubble. I have a different perspective. People are likely hanging
onto their houses, waiting for them to rise high enough to justify selling.
They have an arbitrary, set price in mind at which they're willing to sell.
But if they sense that the market has turned and their price will never be
hit, sellers who have been sitting on the sidelines will rush their houses
to market, putting more downward pressure on prices. This shift in the dynamic
can take place, silently, without an obvious catalyst such as rising interest
rates, just like it did on March 10, 2000 in the Nasdaq.
Any homeowner can call a real estate agent on Friday evening and have his
house on the market by Monday morning, FYI. Undoubtedly said homeowner has
an abundance of refrigerator magnets, rulers, pens, popsicle sticks (?) calendars
and other useless knickknacks from agents who have stopped by recently trying
to solicit business and stay "top of mind." Take your pick, this is a seller's
market.
For now.
Just remember March 10, 2000. It was a normal day, just like any other day.
Nothing special at all, except for that one thing.
Closing Words
This article has made a comparison between the current housing bubble and
the Nasdaq stock bubble of five years ago. There is no guarantee that the housing
bubble will play out in the exact same way, and in fact, it is likely that
it will not. Perhaps this bubble will not go to the same extremes; maybe the
extremes will be even greater. If you are looking to invest, just realize that
you're playing a game of chicken. You may come out ahead, or you may not. Beware
that the signs of a top are present.
If you own a home and have some nice gains, you may consider selling it. Another
sign of a top in any market is that ownership changes from the strong hands
to the weak, in this case from old-timers with lots of equity to greenhorns
that are buying with no money down and are stretched to the limit to make their
payments. Renting is not a bad option when you consider that you don't have
property taxes to pay, don't have to pay for or do your own maintenance, and
you can pocket your housing gains and have real money in the bank. Remember
that the only reason that you "know" your house is worth a certain amount is
because a neighbor down the street sold his house at around that price.
If you're a first time buyer, or looking to move up, ask yourself if you can
really afford the house. Remember, you'll have to pay property taxes that will
no doubt be increasing, maintenance for leaky roofs and busted pipes and all
kinds of updates. Whatever you do, don't get an ARM or an interest only loan!
Rates are going up, and there is no point in doing an interest only loan when
you could rent cheaper. Do you want to own a house for a few years, only to
lose it? Are you going to be stretched to the gills using both salaries, with
no buffer for savings or emergencies? If so, you had better wait unless you
want your life to be a living hell. There is no kind of stress that is worse
than the stress and worry that comes from not having enough money to pay your
mortgage. This is the American Dream turned nightmare. Once house prices turn
down, your mortgage will be underwater and you'll be paying off a house that
is no longer worth what you originally contracted for. On the other hand, if
you wait to buy, you can take the time to save and invest, increase your nest
egg and wait for housing prices to come down to meet you.
Finally, after all of the research I had done for this piece, and after staring
at the Nasdaq charts for so long, I noticed a strange relationship. Some of
the articles noted that houses have doubled in price over the last 5 years
in many areas. By changing the time scale on the Nasdaq chart from 1 to 5 years,
and simply adding two zeros to the price scale, a startling picture has taken
shape.
This is not a predication, it is a scenario based on logic. What goes up eventually
comes down.

Last of all, please do not take my word as gospel; I have no more knowledge
than you when it comes to predicting the future. All I ask is that you think
your decision through, and make your decisions based on facts and logic, not
fantasies and emotions.
# # #
This is Part III of a five part series examining the opportunities and pitfalls
of living through the Great Transition. Part IV examines the root of all bubbles:
money in general and the U.S. Dollar specifically, while Part V examines some
potential scenarios for the future. The
other articles may be found here.
To be notified of future updates, please click here to subscribe.