|
Fed Chairman Greenspan testified today before the Joint Economic Committee
(JEC). As an aside, the JEC is one of the best committees in Congress. Why?
Because it has no legislative authority. In other words, it can do no harm.
Greenspan did not break any new ground in today's testimony. Although economic
growth has slowed, Greenspan does not see further slowing. Inflation is contained.
The recent spike in unit labor costs is partially the result of one-off increases
in bonuses and stock-option redemptions. Housing is "frothy" in some
regional markets, but there is no national housing bubble, according to Greenspan.
There are no material threats to the national economy if some of the housing
froth dissipates. In his prepared comments, Greenspan cut and pasted from the
May 3rd FOMC policy announcement in that the FOMC still "believes that
policy accommodation can be removed at a pace that is likely to be measured.
Nonetheless, the Committee will respond to changes in economic prospects as needed
to fulfill its obligation to maintain price stability." So, the Fed will
keep raising the funds rate by 25 basis points per meeting for the foreseeable
future. But how far into the future is foreseeable? That is, does Greenspan know
the level of the funds rate that would be "neutral"? No. Greenspan
said that the Fed did not have the expertise to determine ahead of time what
the level of the neutral funds rate is. But he would know it when it got there.
So, the neutral funds rate might be 3.25% or 5.25%. All we could infer from
Greenspan's comments is that he believes the current 3.00% funds rate is below
neutral.
As Greenspan nears the end of his Fed tenure, he is showing uncharacteristic
humility in that he still is baffled by the decline in the 10-year Treasury
yield in the past year. Although he notes that historically a flattening yield
curve has been associated with future weaker economic growth, he does not believe
that this is the message the yield curve is sending today. But Greenspan seems
to have a blind spot when it comes to flattening yield curves. This is illustrated
in Chart 1.
Chart 1

Back in 1988, the 10-year Treasury - fed funds rate spread narrowed from
125 basis points in August to 35 basis points in December. I remember that
someone asked Greenspan whether this was a sign that economic growth would
be weakening. He responded that the narrowing spread did not presage slower
economic growth and continued to raise the fed funds rate, pushing the funds
rate above the 10-year yield in 1989. In 1990, we experienced a recession.
Between January and March of 2000, this yield spread narrowed from 121 basis
points to minus 3 basis points in April. The Fed then raised the funds rate
another 50 basis points in May of 2000, inverting the yield curve even more.
The economy slipped into a recession in 2001.
Chart 2

Chart 2, which I repeat from yesterday's commentary, shows the regular
negative relationship between this yield spread and the ISM Manufacturing
New Orders index. As the spread has narrowed in the past year, the New Orders
index has plunged toward the 50 level. But Greenspan says it is different this
time, just as he said back in 1988 and 2000.
|
Paul L. Kasriel, Director of Economic Research
The Northern Trust Company
Economic Research Department
Positive Economic Commentary
"The economics of what is, rather than what you might like it to be."
50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60675
The information herein is based on sources which The Northern Trust Company
believes to be reliable, but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness.
Such information is subject to change and is not intended to influence your
investment decisions.
Copyright © 2005-2008 The Northern
Trust Company
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2008
SafeHaven.com
« BullionVault.com
-- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money:
A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo »
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|