|
Below is an extract from a commentary originally posted at www.speculative-investor.com on
16th June 2005.
We've been short-term bullish on the Dollar Index, which means short-term
bearish on the euro because the dollar's value relative to the euro comprises
almost 60% of the Dollar Index, since 20th December of last year. Furthermore,
we expect to see a moderate amount of additional weakness in the euro over
the next few months and a substantial amount of additional weakness over the
coming year (as discussed in previous commentaries, our view is that EUR/USD
is likely to drop to around 1.18 in the short-term and 1.08 within the next
12 months). However, the currency market action over the past few weeks is
beginning to look quite similar to the action during the final weeks of last
year; only this time it's the euro and not the US$ that is being driven relentlessly
lower by the piling-on of speculators. Today's anti-euro sentiment is not as
pervasive as the anti-dollar sentiment of several months ago and it is not
occurring at the tail end of a 3-year decline, so it most likely doesn't have
any implications beyond the near future. It does, however, suggest that a counter-trend
move in the currency market -- an upward correction in the euro and a downward
correction in the US$ -- has a good chance of beginning very soon.
Every relentless trend needs to have a good story behind it -- something to
encourage the speculators to keep adding to their positions -- but it's not
unusual for the story widely cited as being behind a move to actually be of
only minor significance. During the final quarter of last year and the first
quarter of this year, for example, the dominant story in the currency market
revolved around the US trade and budget deficits. Specifically, the strongly-held
belief that the US$ would continue to weaken until there was a big reduction
in the aforementioned deficits, combined with the obvious fact that such a
reduction was not going to occur in the foreseeable future, gave speculators
the confidence to build-up, or maintain, large bets against the dollar. This
was the case even though there has never been a consistent correlation between
these deficits and the dollar's intermediate-term performance.
What has happened over the past few months, however, is that the US dollar
has embarked on a cyclical bull market despite the fact that the twin deficits
have continued to increase. Moreover, the main focus of speculation has turned
from the dollar's problems to the rejections, by some important members of
the European Monetary Union, of the proposed EU Constitution. Interest rate
differentials all but guarantee significant additional weakness in the euro
relative to the dollar before a new intermediate-term upward trend in the euro
becomes possible; however, as far as relative currency values are concerned
the recent gnashing of teeth over the future of Europe's political union is
even less rational than the late-2004 and early-2005 conviction that the dollar
was definitely going to move lower in the short-term as a result of the US
trade deficit. What this means is that right now -- with the euro nearing important
support at 1.18-1.20 and negativity towards it becoming extreme for reasons
that really shouldn't have a large bearing on relative currency values -- wouldn't
be a good time to initiate a bearish position on the euro.
In summary, we think the euro's decline is overdone in the very short-term,
although we maintain that it will likely trade at 1.18 over the coming 3 months.
As far as the coming year is concerned we suspect that the euro's major correction
still has a considerable way to go, but looking out over the next 4 years we
continue to think that the euro will eventually trade above its late-2004 peak
(the large and growing US trade deficit IS very significant as far as the 2-5
year outlook is concerned).
From a very long-term perspective (5-10 years) the outlook for the euro is
not rosy. Our view has always been that the euro was the ultimate fiat currency;
not in a good way, but because it has never been backed by anything other than
confidence and government force. It has never been anything other than pieces
of paper and electronic entries in computers, so the fact that people willingly
accept it in payment for valuable goods and services represents quite a remarkable
achievement on the part of the governments and banks that brought this 'money'
into being. The US$, on the other hand, evolved into the world's main currency
over more than a century, and during all of its life apart from the past 35
years it was either as good as gold or was officially linked to gold in some
way. Therefore, although the dollar is now a shadow of its former self there
is a lot of history behind its almost universal acceptance and its role as
the world's reserve currency.
|