|
September 11 th was a historic day for American foreign policy. We are, of
course, talking about 9/11/05 when Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's
Liberal Democratic Party was overwhelmingly returned to power in an early election.
According to CNS News, the gutsy Koizumi "called an election more than
two years ahead of schedule after his plans to privatize Japan's monolithic
post office - effectively the world's largest financial institution - ran into
obstacles." While this may be true, Koizumi's victory also validates Japan's
strengthening ties to the United States as some analysts estimate US-Japanese
relations at an all time high in terms of military cooperation.
Japan has clearly shifted away from its post-World War II pacifist stance,
as Japanese so-called "Self Defense Forces" have been playing a more aggressive
(albeit non-provocative) role in the region. Japanese troops have even made
their way to Iraq (at America's request) to help in the reconstruction of that
country's infrastructure. Additionally, the Japanese military has worked with
the United States on programs ranging from missile defense to counterterrorism.
Up until the end of the Cold War, Japan's post-War role in the world was vaguely
defined as an American ally against the Soviet Union. A $13 billion contribution
to help finance the 1991 Gulf War was noteworthy, but such "checkbook diplomacy" was
criticized and of course came without any troops. Things really didn't start
to change until August of 1998 when North Korea, without any advanced warning,
test launched its Taepo Dong missile (with a range of approximately 1,000 miles)
over Japan. This prompted a significant reaction from a stunned Japanese defense
community concerned about a new feeling of vulnerability that had fallen on
Japan.
Over the past several years, there have been calls from both inside and outside
of Japan to revise the constitution and transform the Self Defense Forces into
a full-fledged military. The first major step towards this goal was completed
when, in October 2001, the Japanese Diet passed a special anti-terrorism bill
resulting in the deployment of vessels to the Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea
to provide logistical support to coalition forces in Afghanistan. Fast forward
to today and we see that Japan has recently repositioned significant numbers
of its forces away from northern Japan towards the island of Okinawa, which
is on the East China Sea. This relocation to the disputed waters of the East
China Sea is important because it gives credence to those who see China emerging
as Japan's chief rival.

While the most recent dispute has been over drilling rights, we cannot ignore
the bigger picture when it comes to a Sino-Japanese rivalry. Under Koizumi,
Sino-Japanese relations have deteriorated to a point where thousands of Chinese
citizens have engaged in a number of anti-Japan public protests regarding atrocities
that occurred sixty years ago! Additionally, Japan has become a leading defender
of Taiwan, something that Beijing sees as an internal issue and therefore has
subsequently warned Tokyo to mind its own business.
In addition to rivalries with North Korea and China, Japanese relations with
South Korea remain strained. Even as U.S.-encouraged cooperation between South
Korea and Japan has made progress, Seoul is becoming increasingly weary of
a rearmed Japan. It is true that most of those Koreans who suffered war crimes
at the hands of Japanese invaders have passed, but the memories remain. Japan
is aware of this mistrust and therefore is in no hurry to see a reunified nuclear
Korea. For a Japan surrounded by a nuclear China and a united nuclear Korea
would have no choice but to acquire the same capabilities themselves.
Fortunately, relations between the Japanese, Chinese, Taiwanese and Korean
business communities paradoxically continue to warm. While North Korea is indeed
a threat to the region, it is the Taiwan Straits which have the greatest chances
of becoming flashpoints for armed conflict. Whether ignited by a Taiwanese
declaration of independence or energy insecurity, subscribers should keep focused
on Chinese, Japanese and U.S. naval activities in the region. The U.S.-Japan
alliance has served the region well for a number of years, but the times they
are a changing.
Before we envision a scenario where Japan continues along the path of rearmament,
let's examine what has already taken place according to the South Asia Analysis
Group.
- Japan is upgrading airbases on islands in proximity of Senkakus and Taiwan
e.g. Shimoji Shima Island.
- Japan is doubling its air-refueling capabilities for its extended Southern
coverage.
- Japan is doubling its air transport fleet.
- Upgrading and expansion of AEGIS weapon systems equipped Japanese Navy
ships.
- Increased air-transport lift capabilities.
The next significant step in rearmament will occur when Japan begins the development
of long-range precision missiles which can attack overseas targets including
enemy ballistic missile sites. Finally, Japan will acquire autonomous capabilities
that are not necessarily meant to complement U.S. expeditionary warfare.
Since the U.S.-Japan alliance is in excellent shape today, the majority of
East Asia analysts don't think about the long term consequences of a rearmed
Japan. Most of the preoccupation among this crowd lies with the Chinese People's
Liberation Army becoming a world class military power. Japan has been a helpful
partner in maintaining stability in East Asia, so why worry about giving them
offensive capabilities? This line of thinking is short sighted given the samurai
nation's militaristic and xenophobic history. That being said, Japan may already
possess the one weapon needed to bring America to its knees.
The Bank of Japan (BOJ) is often referred to as "Federal Reserve East" as
it regularly coordinates its monetary policy with the American central bank.
Over the last few years, the BOJ has spent considerable resources (trillions
of Yen) to support the U.S. Dollar. In early 2003, Japan publicly stated that
its central bank would prop up the dollar should it drop sharply following
the then upcoming invasion of Iraq. The reason most commonly cited for Japanese
intervention in the currency markets (i.e. buying dollars) is that Japan lives
and dies by its ability to export goods, and therefore the Yen must be kept
competitive with the Dollar and other currencies.
Another motive for BOJ intervention lies with the old phrase: "If you owe
the bank $100,000, the bank owns you; but if you owe the bank $100 million,
you own the bank." Of course $100 million is just peanuts considering that
Japan holds $700 billion worth of United States Treasury debt. Any hiccup in
the U.S. economy and the market value of those Treasury holdings will suffer.
Japan's willingness to accept U.S. treasuries is nothing more than a gigantic
vendor finance program!
The final and perhaps least-discussed reason why the BOJ has historically
said "How high?" when asked to "jump" by the Fed is the geopolitical situation.
As discussed above, from the end of World War II up until today, Japan has
been 100% dependant on the United States for its security. This arrangement
served both sides well for more than half a century but, as we have shown you,
things are beginning to change. A Japan that does not rely on the United
States for its security means that the BOJ will no longer feel the need to
cooperate with the Fed. As a result, a rearmed Japan will realize that
it has an even more powerful Dollar weapon than China (the second largest holder
of U.S. Treasuries) does. Eventually, these two Asian central banks will stop
accumulating treasuries and possibly begin to unload them, which could trigger
a Dollar collapse. Even more threatening to the Dollar is a possible alliance
among Asian countries with the desire to form their own regional currency similar
to the Euro. While all of these scenarios are just talk, the common denominator
among them is a Japan which no longer relies on America for its protection.
The bottom line is that the more you hear about the changing role of Japan's
military, the closer we are to a major Dollar devaluation.
more follows for subscribers . . .
|