|
Tina Turner a few years ago had a hit song "What's Love Got To Do With it?"
That same question given a few word changes could easily be asked today of
the financial scene. "What's Neutral Got To Do With It?" For a longtime the
Federal Reserve has pushed the idea a neutral interest rate demeanor symbolizes
the Holy Grail of monetary policy.
Trouble is, like the original Holy Grail there have been numerous reported
sighting so far but few confirmations. After 11 interest rates hikes and apparently
more still to come, a typhoon in the energy sector and a couple of havoc-wreaking
hurricanes and signs that inflation is on the rise, many observers appear to
believe the U.S economy is a lot like the energizer bunny - just keeps on going.
Bulls seem to like the current valuations, arguing their case for relativity,
stocks versus bonds, the former being cheap, the latter expensive in their
view. They also like to cite earnings growth, you remember them, predicting
double-digit jumps in 2006. Of late they've been cackling about the strong
dollar and money flows, suggesting that part of the dollar's recent buoyancy
might be coming from foreign investors. Given the run-up in many foreign equity
markets, the argument goes, these foreign investors now view U.S. stocks as
cheap on a relative basis.
Bears, on the on the other hand, suggest earnings are bumping into strong
headwinds, higher energy prices and interest rates and rising inflation, not
to leave out falling investor confidence as measured by the University of Michigan
consumer index. Then there is that little bit about consumer spending based
on what is rapidly become known as equitization (Put down those tomatoes, we
didn't coin the term!), consumers pulling equity from their home to keep the
spending bunny energized.
No less a financial deity than Sir Alan the Maestro Man recently felt the
need to comment. (By the way, the charge that homeowners are using their home
equity like ATM machines is literally true. A friend recently acquired an equity
line of credit from a big money center bank and one of the first things he
received in the mail after his loan was approved was a Pin number and an ATM
card.) Greenspan expressed concern about equity withdrawals as a percent of
consumers' spending patterns. Though off its high, it remains well above the
15-year average. The implication for GDP is clear should this merry go round
suddenly halt.
If Greenspan's comments should strike you as somewhat strange, given that
he's the guy in the eyes of many who fueled the ATM game by holding rates abnormally
low for an abnormally long time, you're not alone. Now that Greenspan's successor,
Ben Bernanke, has been named, another question arises. Given the markets apparent
positive reaction to the announcement by President Bush, is that reaction owing
to Greenspan's departure or to clearing up the uncertainty about who was next
in line? Or is it both?
And that brings us back to neutrality. What is it, how will we recognize it
should it ever appear, when will that be and who saw it last are just a few
questions we suppose the great unwashed are not supposed to ask. Well, just
last week investors may have received a pretty good idea of what it is when
Janet Yellen, president of the San Francisco Federal Reserve, suggested it
may recline somewhere between 3.5 and 5.5 percent. Trouble is the upper end
of that range, 5.5 percent, is well above current consensus and seemed to roil
the markets.
Perhaps the best investors can do is recall Dante's comment about the hottest
places in hell being preserved for those who maintain their neutrality during
times of crisis.
|