|
Federal Reserve Statistical Release
November 10, 2005
Discontinuance of M3
On March 23, 2006, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
will cease publication of the M3 monetary aggregate. The Board will also
cease publishing the following components: large-denomination time deposits,
repurchase agreements (RPs), and Eurodollars. The Board will continue to
publish institutional money market mutual funds as a memorandum item in this
release.
Measures of large-denomination time deposits will continue to be published
by the Board in the Flow of Funds Accounts (Z.1 release) on a quarterly basis
and in the H.8 release on a weekly basis (for commercial banks).
As a former money market/foreign exchange dealer I grew up in the business
on M3. I recall back in the late 1970's when we would sit around on Thursday's
awaiting the Federal Reserve's weekly release of the Money Supply numbers.
The market would centre on M3. The Bond market and the Eurodollar market would
soar or plummet depending on how much M3 grew on the week. Volatility was the
name of the game and one could make or lose thousands or more of dollars if
you correctly (or incorrectly) surmised the weekly money numbers. As the years
went by the weekly money numbers lost some of their aura as they began to target
bands of growth or focused elsewhere rather than on the monetary numbers. Still
it was never forgotten and dutifully I would go and check the weekly releases
to find out how much money supply grew. Old habits die hard.
So what is M3? To understand what M3 is one needs to know what M1 and M2 are
as well.
M1 - Money supply that includes all coins, currency held by the public,
traveler's checks, checking account balances, NOW accounts, automatic transfer
service accounts, and balances in credit unions.
M2 - Money supply that includes M1, plus savings and small time
deposits of depository institutions, overnight repos at commercial banks, and
retail mutual fund money market accounts.
M3 - Money supply that includes M2, plus large time deposits,
repos of maturity greater than one day at commercial banks, institutional money
market accounts and Eurodollar deposits of US banks held at foreign branches
and at all offices in the UK and Canada.
Note: These are the US definitions of M1, M2 and M3. The Bank of Canada's
definitions of M1, M2, and M3 may vary.
While M1 and M2 are measurements of money that are held for the most part
by the general public M3 adds the huge institutional funds to the equation.
These funds are generally the most liquid funds. It does not capture all of
the institutional funds but it does capture an important part of it sufficient
enough to measure the growth of money in the financial system. It is M3 that
has experienced the most explosive growth in the past decade. Since the end
of 1995 M1 has increased a paltry 18.8% while M2 is up 89.5%. But M3 is up
130%. GDP by comparison is up roughly 67% in the same period so M3 growth is
almost double GDP growth. Consumer debt has grown about 123% in the same period
or about equivalent to M3 growth. Business debt is up 97%. It has taken an
incredible amount of debt and money to obtain GDP growth over the past decade.
This is monetary inflation at its best.
I have never paid a whole lot of attention to M2 and even less attention to
M1.In the broader scheme of things they were just not as important as M3. Only
M3 told us what was really going on with monetary growth and the big money
is in the institutions. If the stock market started to jump sharply even though
neither the economic situation nor the economic outlook shifted substantially
one could look over at the monetary numbers and depending on how they grew
get a good idea why the market was rising (or falling if M3 growth was exceptionally
sluggish).
One certainly didn't rush to look at M1. Noting that M1 grew a paltry .7%
in the latest 13 weeks was not significant. While M2 up 5.2% told us a bit
more we had to go to M3 and find it up 10.1% in the latest 13 weeks. There
is serious money and all that money goes somewhere. The stock market has soared
recently. The last time M3 was actually negative was in the early 1990's and
if one recalls it was the last time we had a serious recession. Since 1995
M3 growth has soared and this corresponds with the period when the Federal
Reserve under Alan Greenspan decided to effectively print their way out of
the recessionary early nineties.
M3 is very important. Indeed of the Fed's monetary numbers only M3 was of
major importance and in other G7 countries we also focus on M3 including our
own Bank of Canada. No word that they intend to follow. So why are they dropping
M3? Well we have seen nothing to tell us why we only know they are doing it.
Oh it's not that the numbers will completely disappear. For those that wish
to take the time they can pore through the Flow of Funds accounts (released
quarterly as Z.1 release and the H.8 bulletin released weekly for commercial
banks) and piece together the former M3. Painstaking, but that is not the way
it is supposed to be. European Central Bankers put great stead in M3 so why
has the Fed after all these years decided to cease publication?
Some of the reasons we have seen floated around are as follows:
- History has shown that only failing economies e.g. Soviet Union keep data
secret (Financial Sense - Toni Straka - Unpleasant M3 Trend, November 12,
2005). An interesting premise and a theme we saw woven amongst a number of
writers is that they have something to hide. The claim is that the Fed should
be transparent and by not publishing the number the Fed now lacks transparency.
- The end of publishing of M3 in March 2006 coincides with the start of the
Iranian Oil Bourse. The premise here is that the with the oil bourse trading
in Euros there will be a rush out of US$ into Euros and that M3 could drop
sharply. A sharp drop in M3 would of course presage a recession as falling
M3 is a characteristic of weak economic periods.
- M3 is a measure of inflation in the economy. A somewhat unproven rule of
thumb is GDP + inflation = M3. Will be able to properly measure inflation
going forward if we don't know what M3 really is.
- We are about to enter a period of hyperinflation and by eliminating M3
we will not know how much liquidity the Fed is pumping into the system. Remember
the Fed doesn't really print money it is the banking system that expands
money supply. But the Fed influences it through open market operations. We
will have to watch daily Fed repo action very carefully irrespective of whether
they are going to publish Repos (RPs) as noted in the bulletin above. The
Fed doing repos puts money into the system and the Fed doing reverse repos
takes money out of the system. Of course as well this is the exact opposite
of the collapse in M3 premised with the oil bourse above.
- Further on the theme above a period of hyperinflation would occur as the
Fed tries to save us from a collapsing housing market and softer consumer
demand. The Fed adds more and more liquidity to the system to stave off a
sharp economic decline. By not publishing Repos (RPs) as noticed in their
bulletin above the Fed again is hiding what they do on a day to day basis.
This will make it difficult for both currency traders and equity traders
to know what the Fed is up to.
- The conclusion is that the Federal Reserve will be hiding a debasement
of the US$.
One writer (Recently announced reporting changes at the Fed - Captain
Hook, November 18, 2005 on SafeHaven) compared this move by the Fed to
Nixon's closing of the "gold window" in August 1971. It might be although
the ceasing of the publication of a widely watched monetary number does not
quite compare to a default which is effectively what the US did when they
closed the "gold window". But given the importance of M3 to market watchers
we do have to wonder at what the Fed wants to hide. As Captain Hook notes "we
just got another "big signal" from US monetary authorities that the rules
of the game are about to be changed fundamentally, once again."
And the results might be the same. Indeed an examination of gold shows that
that gold made a low November 4 near $456. By the time of this announcement
Gold had climbed back to $470. Then 3 days later gold leaped and it has been
on a tear ever since. This has come despite the recent rise in the US$. Indeed
gold prices have been rising now for several weeks despite the strong performance
of the US$. While it is possible that the US$ has a target zone of 95 based
off what appears as a head and shoulders bottom it is not slowing down the
recent jump in gold prices.
Putting aside demand/supply conditions that favour gold right now the recent
sharp jump in gold prices can only be explained in light of a realization that
a monetary disaster is in the making. Gold is or has been breaking out in a
number of currencies recently as well. Gold is the ultimate currency and when
it is going up against all currencies it is telling us that something big is
going to happen.



|