|
You wouldn't know it from the gloriously sublime autumn with which we have
been blessed in much of the US, but winter is inexorably approaching. As inevitable
as winter is the mainstream interest it generates in natural gas as cold temperatures
drive higher heating bills.
Natural gas is really fascinating stuff on many levels. It is primarily methane,
the lightest hydrocarbon molecule. It is burned to drive turbines in electrical-power-generation
plants, to heat homes and businesses across the nation, and as a feedstock
to produce the agricultural fertilizer ammonia. It is one of the most important
economic commodities in the US today after crude oil.
But unlike the global crude-oil markets serviced by great supertanker fleets,
natural-gas markets remain largely regional or continental at best. Vast gas
deposits exist in remote regions of the world, but gas deposits in the US are
rapidly being depleted. Gas can be efficiently moved from areas of high supply
to high demand via land pipelines, but undersea pipelines are uneconomical
and impractical for ocean transport.
Today more gas is being liquefied, supercooled to -260°F which shrinks
its volume by 600x, and transported across the seas in tankers, but so far
this LNG industry remains small relative to total gas consumption. While LNG
tanker fleets may rival crude-oil supertankers someday, so far they have not
overcome the inherent locality of the natural-gas markets. As gas consumption
in the States grows, prices have to climb since gas cannot yet be imported
on the same scale as oil.
Thus, for many years to come in the States, natural-gas demand growth will
exceed supply growth keeping US gas prices high. As investors and speculators,
this structural deficit creates a marvelous fundamental opportunity for us
to profit. The elite gas companies that are drilling, pumping, and transporting
the scarce gas to market are in an amazing position to reap legendary gains
for years.
The best place to start investigating natural-gas stocks is in their premier
sector index, the XNG. The XNG is the Amex Natural Gas Index. It currently
contains 15 component "companies in the natural gas industry involved primarily
in natural gas exploration and production and natural gas pipeline transportation
and transmission." The XNG was born in October 1993 and is equally weighted with
a quarterly rebalancing.
A couple weeks ago I discussed the weighting problems inherent in the XOI
Amex Oil Index. Its share-price weighting gives tiny companies
an enormous impact disproportionate to their true market importance. Even
though the natural gas and oil indexes both have the same custodian, thankfully
the equal weighing in the XNG greatly reduces similar problems in it.
Actual XNG weightings run from 6.1% to 7.5% while the true component market-cap
weightings range from 0.9% to 14.6%. While I still think market-cap-weighted
indexes are superior, the XNG's equal weighting makes far more sense than the
XOI's share-price weighting. And the XNG companies are much smaller than oil
companies anyway, which further reduces index-weighting distortion. The XNG
is capitalized at $192b while the XOI is running closer to $1000b.
With a sector index to track as a proxy for natural-gas stocks in general,
we can examine how gas stocks have tended to trade so far in their bull to
date. By examining their technical behavior including typical uplegs and corrections
as well as their correlation with potential drivers including the natural-gas
prices, we can greatly improve our odds of discerning major interim lows and
highs in the future. Then we can attempt to buy low and sell high and ride
this gas-stock bull.
Our first chart this week combines a study of average XNG uplegs and corrections
with the index's Relativity analysis.
Like all bull markets the XNG tends to advance away from its 200-day moving
average in uplegs and converge back to it in periodic corrections. The Relative
XNG, or rXNG, divides the index by its 200dma to express this relationship
as a constant multiple. The resulting red line creates a horizontal XNG trading
band discussed further below.

Before we delve into the rXNG, it is really useful to examine the XNG itself
technically. Understanding how it has performed so far builds a solid probability
foundation under our expectations for future performance. Bull to date since
its birth in 2002 the XNG has had eight separate upleg/correction cycles. The
bull-to-date high at the top of each cycle is numbered above and upleg gains
and correction losses for each cycle are noted.
The first five cycles formed an initial uptrend channel that lasted until
mid-2004. Since then the XNG's uptrend has steepened a bit as defined by the
latest three cycles. Accelerating upslopes in bull markets are normal and expected
and we have already witnessed them in gold stocks, silver stocks, and oil stocks.
Today the index's primary support is running near 350, just under its 200dma.
The XNG may very well pull back to these levels before marching higher, although
it certainly isn't necessary.
All eight upleg and correction cycles witnessed average upleg gains of 33%
from the beginning of the cycle to its bull-to-date-high apex. If the XNG does
indeed retreat to its support near 350 before surging again, a 33% gain from
those levels would yield a new upleg target of 465. While future uplegs won't
be exactly like past specimens, speculators need to know that past probabilities
favor gains hovering around 33%. So when future uplegs exceed this benchmark
traders need to be cautious and prepared for a correction.
These corrections from each cycle top to its subsequent major interim low
have averaged 12% bull to date. This is really pretty mild within the context
of a secular bull, reflecting the relatively tranquil nature of the natural-gas
stocks compared to volatile speculations like gold stocks. The smooth gradient
of this gas-stock bull so far makes it perfect for investors since even 20%
trailing stops wouldn't be universally triggered in a typical correction. This
is far more sedate than gold
stocks, which have averaged 98% uplegs and 27% corrections.
Interestingly our current correction since early October is already off 16%,
the second largest correction in this bull so far. In light of the preceding
upleg eight though, this definitely makes sense. Following the hurricanes hammering
the Gulf Coast natural-gas prices spiked mightily and gas stocks followed them
up. Once the dust settled and it became apparent that the storms didn't quite
knock natural-gas infrastructure back into the Stone Age, the XNG corrected
sharply from its spike highs.
The periodic corrections witnessed in the XNG bull form an extremely well-defined
lower relative support line. Shaded in light green above, note how the
XNG has tended to bounce right around 1.06x its 200dma. In seven of its eight
upleg/correction cycles the correction ended pretty darned close to 1.06x relative.
Even this latest sharp correction has exhibited a tendency to respect this
1.06x support and bounce higher twice now.
While it is entirely possible that our current correction will go lower since
reaction corrections off event-driven spike highs tend to be steeper and deeper,
gas-stock investors and speculators would do well in the future to watch the
1.06x relative level. Whenever the XNG slides after a new bull-to-date high
and grinds down to within 6% of its 200dma, odds are that will signal a great
time to add long gas-stock plays.
Unfortunately the rXNG resistance band, rendered in red above at 1.24x the
XNG's 200dma, is not as crystal clear as its support. The XNG's major uplegs
have topped in a wide range running from 1.15ish to over 1.30ish so the rXNG
sell zone is not as clear as the buy. But the last several XNG uplegs, which
are the most interesting and relevant to traders today due to their recent
occurrence, have tended to top around 1.24x.
Thus, when future XNG uplegs start pulling 24% or so above their anchoring
200dmas, it is prudent for speculators to start preparing for a pullback. This
can range from ratcheting up trailing stops on stock positions to selling gas-stock
calls to buying gas-stock puts. Thankfully catching tops is not as important
as catching bottoms for stock speculators since trailing stops can be used
to let the markets automatically close positions when the time is right with
no emotional angst.
This analysis helps us better understand the probabilities that have governed
the XNG bull so far. It has tended to run 33% higher in major uplegs and correct
12% in major corrections. And the index has been fairly consistent in running
in a range of 1.06x to 1.24x its 200dma. In the future when the XNG exceeds
these established averages speculators can assume the probability of an imminent
reversal is higher than normal and act accordingly.
While understanding the technical nature of a particular bull provides invaluable
real-time insights moving forward, traders need to dig even deeper. In order
to increase the odds of successfully anticipating a great trading opportunity
like a major interim top or bottom, it is important to find the drivers of
a particular bull market. Gold prices are definitely the primary driver of
the gold-stock bull, but are natural-gas prices driving tactical trends in
the XNG?
Prior to doing this research work I assumed the answer to this important question
would be yes, and indeed it probably is on a long-term strategic basis. But
over the short-term frames of reference, such as the individual major upleg/correction
cycles, the apparent XNG drivers were surprising. Amazingly, on an individual-cycle
level natural gas did not appear to be the most influential driver of
the companies that produce and distribute it!
One way to analyze potential drivers is with tactical correlation analysis.
The statistical correlation between the XNG and other prices can be analyzed
to see where the greatest parallels lie. The following three charts analyze
the XNG's correlation with other prices over the same eight upleg/correction
cycles discussed above. Under each correlation number is its corresponding
r-square percentage, which reveals how likely daily movements in the XNG can
be statistically explained and predicted by movements in other prices.

On this chart the blue series with the black, white, and yellow technicals
is natural gas and the XNG is rendered in the background in red. As the technical
trend lines clearly reveal, natural gas is in a secular bull market. It has
climbed from $2 in early 2002 to $15 just recently, and the center of its trend
channel is now near $8. This 782% gain for this commodity is staggering. By
comparison gold is only up 92% in dollar terms in its own bull.
Even if natural gas was to correct back down to its lower support under $7,
its bull market would still be spectacular compared to most other commodities.
Note that at today's $12ish levels natural gas is twice as expensive as last
winter's $6ish levels. This is why the mainstream media is making a big deal
out of scaring Americans with prognostications of 100% gas-bill increases this
winter. Really though, gas should continue correcting as parabolic spikes are
never sustainable as its early 2003 example illustrated.
So natural gas is inarguably in an awesome bull market. And natural-gas stocks'
profits should soar with gas prices driving them up in concert. And indeed
the XNG has risen nicely, up 300% bull to date since mid-2002. There is no
doubt that over the long term gas prices will drive gas stocks, as higher profits
lead to higher stock prices. But over the short-term, surprisingly, gas is
not that strong of predictor of XNG levels.
Overall in the chart above the XNG and natural gas had a 0.803 correlation.
This may sound high, but it is really the correlation squared, or r-square,
that is useful to speculators, not the raw correlation. A 0.803 correlation
only yields an r-square of 64%. Only 64% of the daily behavior of the XNG over
the past four years or so could be explained or predicted by natural gas on
a strategic level.
If we average the r-squares for each of the six positively-correlated individual
upleg/correction cycles in the XNG, the results are even less encouraging.
Only 49% of the daily movement in the XNG could be explained by natural gas's
machinations. This leads me to suspect that monitoring natural gas itself is
not likely to be particularly useful for gas-stock traders. Gas stocks will follow
gas strategically, but tactically they seem to do whatever they want.
This surprise creates something of a quandary. Just as watching gold's
technicals is useful for trading gold stocks and watching oil's
technicals is useful for trading oil stocks, I had assumed natural-gas
technicals would offer buy/sell timing clues for gas stocks. These external
signals not bound within the index technicals themselves have proven invaluable
in this great
commodities bull so far. Risks multiply when a sector is traded solely
on its own intrinsic technicals with no external fundamental driver to verify
buy/sell signals.
Surely the XNG is correlated with some external factor that could help us
time it. Since oil stocks have had fairly high correlations with the general
stock markets in recent years, I decided to see if the XNG was correlated
with the S&P 500. It is certainly possible that gas stocks are largely
held by mainstream investors and therefore buffeted about by the same forces
that drive major uplegs and corrections in general stocks.

Indeed there have been periods of time when the XNG was tactically correlated
with the SPX, especially in the early days of the massive bear rally in stocks
in 2003. The overall strategic r-square of this pairing is 68%, slightly higher
than that of the XNG and natural gas. But if you carefully analyze this chart,
over the past two years the earlier high XNG/SPX correlations have all faded.
Overall, when the r-squares of the seven positively-correlated XNG upleg/correction
cycles are averaged the result is 48%. This is pretty ironic as it is just
1% below the similar 49% tactical average of the XNG and natural gas. And in
the last three XNG cycles, the average r-square of its SPX correlation has
plummeted to 30%, which isn't even worth pondering. Thus, general-stock action
probably won't tell us much about future XNG uplegs and corrections.
Now at this stage in my research I was disappointed. The XNG didn't correlate
with natural gas well enough to trade in a tactical sense nor did it correlate
with general stocks. We could certainly trade elite gas stocks solely using
XNG technicals, but I prefer not to do this as no external signal confirmations
multiply the risks of misinterpreting XNG signals. I slept on it for a day
and was watching Bloomberg early the next morning while working out and heard
some commentator talk of "oil and gas stocks" as if they were a single sector.
As I was lifting weights I was wondering if it could really be that simple,
if the XNG mimicked the oil stocks to a high enough degree that we could use
the oil stocks to confirm XNG signals. So I built another spreadsheet and made
this final chart comparing the XNG to the XOI oil-stock index. The results
were stunning. Apparently the XOI is like the holy grail of external
timing for natural-gas stock signals!

The correlations between the XNG and XOI are so high that they may as well
be one sector, I have never seen anything like this in all my previous market
studies. Strategically these entire four years have a stellar r-square of 95%.
Fully 95% of the daily XNG price action in this entire bull has been explainable
and predictable by the daily price action in the XOI oil stocks. And this relationship
held tactically too.
When the r-squares of the seven XNG cycles with positive correlations are
averaged, the result is 93%! And the average of the last four XNG cycles, the
most relevant to today's traders, is 96%. This level of correlation is just
off the charts. Oil stocks and gas stocks don't seem to trade as two independent
sectors driven by their own very different fundamentals, but as one common
energy-stock sector. XNG traders therefore need to monitor XOI
and oil technicals very closely to help time XNG trading decisions.
Why is this? There are a couple theories I have been pondering.
Compared to oil stocks, gas stocks are a small market. This is similar to
the relationship between gold stocks and silver stocks, the silver stocks'
capitalization is dwarfed by gold stocks. What if most gas-stock investors
and speculators are primarily oil-stock investors and speculators? If
so, they probably concentrate on trading oil stocks and buy/sell gas stocks
on the periphery at the same times they are already buying/selling
oil stocks.
Gas stocks may be somewhat of a little-sister market to oil stocks like silver
stocks are to gold stocks. Silver-stock investors are sometimes confounded
when silver stocks are far more highly correlated with gold-stock levels than
with silver, which would make much more fundamental sense. This is because
most silver-stock traders are primarily gold-stock traders and they look to
gold for their timing cues. The relationship between gas stocks and oil stocks
may be similar.
Another possibility surrounds the nature of the oil and gas extraction industries.
A great deal of the natural gas produced is either produced by primary oil
companies and/or is a byproduct of oil production. As such, the majority of
natural-gas profits may accrue to primary oil companies anyway. This could
cause investors to mentally group the remaining independents specializing in
gas into an oil-driven trading paradigm.
Regardless of the reasons, gas stocks have traded like oil stocks in
this bull to date. We have already integrated this knowledge into our trades.
In our premium Zeal Speculator alert
service, in the last couple weeks we have bought and recommended gas stocks
and gas-stock call options since gas-stock prices are looking relatively low
these days. This campaign is just getting started and we hope to layer in more
trades soon. Please subscribe
today if you are interested in this excellent gas-stock opportunity!
The bottom line is gas stocks are in a secular bull market that is likely
to last for years. Natural-gas demand growth is outstripping supply growth
in the US and companies involved in this industry are going to thrive on persistently
higher gas prices. Higher gas prices mean higher profits which ultimately lead
to higher stock prices as investors bid up gas stocks to chase these profits.
Gas-stock investors will probably win big in the coming years, and watching
XNG technicals and oil-stock levels will probably yield great trading signals
for buying and selling gas stocks.
|