|
Specter of the Gold Standard
A specter is haunting executive mansions, chambers of legislatures, and halls
of universities: the ghost of the gold standard. Governments and academia have
utterly failed in discharging their sacred duty to provide a serene environment
for the search for and dissemination of truth regarding economics in general
and monetary science in particular.
This failure has to do, first and foremost, with the incestuous financing
of scientific research ever since the Federal Reserve System was launched in
the United States in 1913. The formula for distributing the profits and undivided
surpluses of the Federal Reserve banks has made it possible for the United
States Treasury to grab the lion's share (in spite of explicit prohibition
of Treasury participation in the earnings of these banks by the Federal Reserve
Act as amended), with far-reaching consequences. As a result the bond market
has been reduced to a gambling casino where shills, in order to whip up gambling
frenzy, conspicuously make obscene gains at the gaming tables.
Check-Kiting by Another Name
But unknown to the public, at the end of the day the shills (the Federal Reserve
banks) are obliged to hand over their gains to the casino owner (the United
States Treasury). There is nothing open about what is euphemistically called "open
market operations" of the Federal Reserve. It is in fact a covert conspiratorial
operation. It has come about through unlawful delegation of power without imposing
countervailing responsibilities. It was never authorized by the Federal Reserve
Act of 1913. It defies the principle of checks and balances. It is immoral.
It is the most lucrative business second only to highway robbery. It is a formula
to corrupt and ultimately to destroy the republic.
Even though later amendments to the Federal Reserve Act retroactively authorized
it, the constitutionality of open market operation has never been put to the
test. It is clear that such an examination would not be in the interest of
the conspirators, and they would use every means at their disposal to prevent
it. The folksy name for open market operations is check-kiting, whereby two
conspiring parties issue obligations that neither one has the intention or
the means to honor but, when they come up for clearing, the phantom obligation
of one party is covered with that of the other.
Incest in Financing Research
What concerns us here most is the fact that the junior partner in the conspiracy,
the Federal Reserve, can only increase its share of the loot beyond the mandated
limit of 6 percent per annum of subscribed capital if it increases its power
in a way not measurable in dollars. It can readily do so by beefing up its "support" of
research, namely, by spending pre-distribution dollars in making grants to
anybody pretending to be able to write awe-inspiring, mathematically convoluted,
nonetheless vacuous, papers on macroeconomics, or anything else of which the
fraudulence and charlatanism is hard to detect.
As a result of this immoral way of financing research a veritable deluge of
worthless papers has glutted the technical literature on money which have one
common earmark: they all attempt to defend the indefensible. They try to defend
the issuance of irredeemable promises to pay: the bonds issued by the Treasury
and the Federal Reserve notes issued by the Federal Reserve banks. Thus, then,
the basis for money creation is the flimsy check-kiting scheme whereby the
Federal Reserve banks buy the bonds with the notes while the Treasury uses
the notes to pay the bondholders at maturity. The bond is supposed to have
value because it is 'redeemable' in the note which, in turn, is supposed to
have value because it is 'backed' by the bond. In effect both instruments are
irredeemable and both lack backing in the form of any verifiable wealth. At
the heart of the money-creating process, however explained, analyzed or defended,
is the stubborn fact that both the Treasury and the Federal Reserve banks are
privileged to issue obligations that they have neither the intention nor the
means to honor. For any other would-be check-kiters the running of such a scheme
would constitute a crime dealt with by the Criminal Code.
This double standard of justice has, of course, an immensely demoralizing
effect. But what concerns us here is that the grant departments of the Federal
Reserve banks have effectively put themselves in charge of deciding what should
and what should not be researched on the subject of money. While they control
research on money directly, they control the appointment of heads of
economics department and directors of research institutions and other think-tanks indirectly.
This incest in financing research stands without precedent in the entire history
of science to the eternal shame of our "enlightened" age, regardless what yardstick
we may choose to measure it, of which the dollar amounts of grant money is
only the most conspicuous, but we should not ignore the more subtle yet more
persuasive methods of arm-twisting: bribe and blackmail.
Crime of Omission
The hijacking of the agenda for economic research has resulted in a distortion
of traditional values. The new values favor ephemeral knowledge, short-horizon
planning, consumerism, debt-creation without seeing how it will be retired,
instant gratification, marginalization of savings, scientific charlatanism,
spreading half truths and even outright falsehoods, while discriminating against
durable knowledge, time-honored scientific values, work-hard/save-hard ethics,
long-horizon planning. It is no less a crime of omission than it is a crime
of commission, as revealed by the following.
(1) Support for research on the merit of metallic monetary standards as
a political arrangement of placing the power to create and to extinguish
money directly into the hands of the people, rather than into the hands of
elected representatives or appointed agents, in conformity with the demands
of the U.S. Constitution, is nil.
(2) Support for research on the burning question of the "sudden death syndrome" as
it affects irredeemable currencies with a deadly 100 percent efficiency,
is zero.
(3) Support for research on the question of legality of the open market operations
by the Federal Reserve as it was surreptitiously and illegally introduced
and retroactively authorized, is unavailable.
(4) Support for research on the scientific foundation of accounting and on
the necessity of taking great pains to make the sharpest possible distinction
between an asset and a liability, capital and credit, debt owing and
debt owning, is naught, in contrast with generous support for research
purporting to justify the practice of shunting items in the balance sheet
of governments from the liability to the asset column.
(5) Support for research on the code of inspecting financial statements in
order to prevent overstating assets and understating liabilities, even in
the balance sheet of banks, is non-existent.
(6) Support for the scientific examination of the curious tenet that it is
possible to increase the volume of unpaid and unpayable debt in the world
indefinitely, is denied.
(7) Support for the examination of the question whether the issuance of promises
to pay which the issuer has neither the intention nor the means to honor
can have any justification, is not available.
Inflicting Irredeemable Currency on the People
The above short list already makes it abundantly clear that something is woefully
amiss with the principle of granting unlimited power, not subject to advice
and consent, still less to control, review or withdrawal by the public, empowering
one particular agency not only to issue purchasing media but also to direct,
permit or inhibit all scientific research pertaining to the question of its
own activity of issuing the purchasing media.
It is a sad commentary on the corruption of the flow of funds in support of
research that neither a single court of justice, nor a single accredited university
in the entire world has found it possible to place the justification for a
world-embracing regime of irredeemable currency on its agenda, after thirty-five
years of unprecedented economic and financial devastation, including the decimation
of the purchasing power of all the currencies and the even more vicious decimation
of all the bond values, directly attributable to that regime.
It was this corruption of financing research that has disabled the immune
system of society, that has made economics and monetary science open to the
invasion of quackery and chicanery, ensuring that the success of the final
assault on sound money would be a foregone conclusion. In the end the government
of the United States could inflict irredeemable currency not only on its own
subjects, but on the people of the rest of the world as well, without meeting
any significant resistance.
Integrity of Financial Journalism
It speaks volumes about its integrity that financial journalism has failed
to alert the public to the imminent danger of a credit collapse arising out
of the universal use of irredeemable currency which the governments of the
world have blithely embraced and foisted upon their subjects, without bothering
to examine the scientific and juridical arguments against it. In previous instances
of experiments with this type of currency sane and self-respecting governments
have always resisted the temptation of the siren song to join others living
in financial backwater. Whenever weak governments came to their senses and
wanted to return to the path of monetary rectitude, there was no lack of countries
around on the gold standard to lend them a helping hand.
No such luck this time. The world is a rudderless ship on uncharted waters,
and the storm is fast approaching. When it strikes, it will be "everybody for
himself". No helping hand will assist survivors. All defenses against this
type of disaster have been dismantled, and all life savers cast overboard,
thanks to the diligence of the grants departments of the Federal Reserve banks.
Not only have financial journalists failed to alert the people to the dangers
they are facing under the regime of irredeemable currency, they keep adding
insult to injury. They lionize the Wonderful Wizard of US, King Alan who, unlike
King Canute, has been able to order the tide of inflation to recede. Maybe
after disaster has struck it will be blamed on the 'early' retirement of the
Wizard.
Gold Standard University
In order to soften the coming blow, a group of concerned citizens have decided
to establish, in the year 2006, Gold Standard University, home for the study
of monetary topics placed under taboo by other institutions of higher learning.
Here is a partial list:
(a) The gold standard is a mechanism whereby the people can exercise
their power of creating or extinguishing money while denying monopoly power
of money creation to would-be crooks.
(b) The longevity of the regime of irredeemable currency can be extended
through machinations such as the artificial suppression of the dollar price
of gold, but only at the price of making the inevitable credit collapse a
great deal more painful and recovery ever more protracted.
(c) The idea of increasing the stock of money based on scientific
principles is chimerical. There is no scientific way of determining the optimal
rate of increase in the money supply any more than there is a scientific
way of predicting future. If the power to increase the money supply is delegated
to an agency dressed in a scientific garb, then this agency represents impostors
hell-bent to usurp unlimited power under false pretenses. Unlimited power
inevitably means unlimited corruption.
(d) The regime of irredeemable currency is a scheme whereby savers
and producers are disenfranchised. Savers are deprived of their power of
choosing the form in which they want to save. They are forced to save in
terms of a depreciating currency. Producers are deprived of their right to
sell to whomever they wish to sell. They are forced to give the right of
first refusal to the issuer of irredeemable currency.
(e) The chief merit of the gold standard is not to be found in the
stabilization of prices which is neither possible nor desirable, but in the
stabilization of interest rates. Only the gold standard can guarantee the
lowest level for the rate of interest that is still compatible with conditions
in a free economy. There is no bond speculation under a gold standard. The
resulting stable interest rate structure benefits both the savers and the
producers.
(f) The so-called open market operations of the Federal Reserve is
a fraudulent practice. It should have never been authorized. It is a prescription
to destabilize interest rates if not in the short then certainly in the long
run. Bond speculators crowd out savers and producers in the bond market.
Anticipating its moves, they act en bloc before the Federal Reserve,
to pick up riskless profits. They rush from one side of market to the other
which will generate a destabilizing oscillation in the rate of interest,
to the great detriment of both the savers and the producers.
(g) Gold hoarding under a gold standard is harmless. (This assumes
that saboteurs are not permitted or encouraged to spread false rumors about
the imminent suspension of gold payments by the government or by the banks.)
Gold hoarding is a legitimate tool in the hand of the bondholder to withdraw
bank reserves thereby forcing banks to contract credit, thus allowing the
rate of interest to rise and find its proper level. Gold hoarding is also
a legitimate tool in the hands of the electorate to force the government
to fulfill its election promises for greater economy in public spending.
In the absence of a gold standard the electorate is helpless. It has no way
to hold cynical vote-buying politicians to account.
(h) By contrast, hoarding other marketable commodities is harmful.
It is destabilizing as it contributes to oscillating speculative money flows
between the commodity market and the bond market.It may trigger a runaway
resonating vibrator between prices and interest rates. It can only be prevented
by removing all obstacles in the way of gold hoarding, which is the proper
outlet for the propensity to hoard.
* * *
The Gold Standard University appeals to individuals:
who cherish freedom and the ideal of government of limited and enumerated powers;
who support the principle of checks and balances in public affairs as well
as the notion of delegating power only if it is encumbered with countervailing
responsibilities;
who reject the formula to finance scientific research through an incestuous
combination of the monopoly to create money and the monopoly to dictate the
agenda for monetary research;
who reject the prostitution of mathematics to be used as a smoke-screen with
which to camouflage the enslavement of the entire population of earth;
and it calls upon them to step forward and support the cause of exposing monetary
deceit and mischief, to fight pseudo-monetary-science and the obfuscation of
eternal monetary truths.
The global regime of irredeemable currency has reduced the people of the world
to bondage. Monetary servitude is no better than other forms long since discarded
by history, such as slavery and serfdom. It may well be worse if for no other
reason than being covert, whereas previous forms of bondage have been overt.
Disenfranchised scum of the earth, rise! Put an end to the usurpation of
power by the clique of impostors pretending to be monetary experts! Chase
the money-mongers out of the temple! Cast your jail-keepers into the sixth
circle of the seven in Hell, to which Dante confined all counterfeiters of
money, perpetrators of false pretenses, and other tormentors of widows and
orphans! Scientific truth is on your side! It is you, not your slave-drivers,
who command the high moral ground! You can win a world free of yokes! The
only thing you may lose is your shackles!
People of the world, unite!
|