|
We all remember the dot com craze of the late 1990's, as well as the aftermath.
Regrettably, for many people some recollections are more painful than others.
While that craze died a quick death with the NASDAQ market crash of 2000,
the bubble psychology that steered it did not, having been masterfully re-routed
to the housing market, courtesy of the US Federal Reserve's deflation fearing
generational low interest rate policies. Getting a loan became too easy, as
did the profits from liquidity driven real estate speculation. The enormous
liquidity and low rates were a shot in the arm to the savings and income short
American consumer, who was now able to tap into low-rate induced rising home
equity values, and spend the money on consumer goods. This ATM cash withdrawal
machine of sorts, and the consumer spending it helped generate, is what arguably
kept the economy from tipping into recession.
But there was no silver lining in this cloud for the US dollar. Its value
took one on the chin as rates fell, declining against most currencies as well
as tangible assets like oil, gold and other commodities. Deflationary fears,
having been drowned out by the oceans of liquidity, quickly gave way to inflationary
concerns. In 2004 the Fed reversed course and started raising interest rates,
citing these inflationary concerns as well as a falling dollar. By doing so,
they disturbed a delicate balance when it came to the consumer. Relaxed in
his warm bubble bath, the consumer watched nervously as the Fed turned the
cold water tap on. By 2005, the warm comfort was replaced by pneumonia, as
many consumers were facing loan defaults and bankruptcies hit records.
The issue of course is how and why did we get to this point? Why would the
Fed lower rates to generational lows spurring a housing and mortgage bubble,
only to squeeze loan holders - a large number of whom had taken out short-term
variable rate loans - shortly thereafter with rising interest rates? The quick
and easy answer would be myopia; but its astonishing level begs for an analysis
in order to do it justice.
It is argued that the US dollar is America's most valuable export. I would
not disagree with that assessment. Ever since the days when the US was the
dominant player in world oil production sales of oil, particularly after the
1944 Bretton Woods agreement, were exclusively denominated in dollars. The
Bretton Woods conference also established the IMF and World Bank and adopted
a new gold-linked dollar as the currency for international transactions, effectively
bestowing upon the US dollar the status of world reserve currency. This multi-dimensional
demand for US dollars would keep dollar denominated asset values strong, as
the entire world needed to accumulate US dollar based reserves for the purpose
of securing current and future oil purchases.
However the US went off the gold standard in 1971, breaking the Bretton Woods
gold link. Money and debt creation became the norm at that point as the US,
removed from the shackles of the gold anchor, started to lose its status as
a creditor nation. Cutting off that gold linkage however created a confidence
issue amongst its trading partners, jeopardizing the world reserve status of
the dollar. Needing to find a way to maintain dollar supremacy, the US struck
deals with Saudi Arabia and others which ensured that the most valuable commodity
of all would continue to be priced in US dollars alone.
Some thirty years later, the US is the world record holder in debt accumulation;
although much to the chagrin of the US's reportedly dwindling gold reserves,
not a record for which gold medals are awarded. Debt levels under the current
administration have reached such dizzying heights that nerves are being stretched
thin. Several news sources report that countries have been diversifying out
of dollars and dollar assets. Braver countries are, once again, talking about
pricing oil in other currencies; a move that would further reduce dependence
on US assets and US government policies. Gold and commodity markets have also
taken notice, suggesting that a world consensus might be forming; one that
views the US as abusing its world reserve currency privilege, to the detriment
of other nations.
The bullish view is that the US experienced a similar set of geopolitical
problems in those troublesome 1970's as well, only to come away unharmed, roaring
into the 1980's. The inference of course being that those in this camp worry
too much, or are too negative. A critical difference between then and now however,
as noted above, is that in the 1970's the US was a creditor nation, whereas
today it is a debtor nation. Furthermore, in the 1970's there were depressed
asset values in both the stock and real estate markets, such that the tight
monetary policy and higher inflation fighting interest rates that followed,
although troublesome, did not significantly impact already depressed asset
markets.
The same would not hold true today however, where massive debt levels, whether
consumer or government, would buckle under the weight of continued interest
rate increases. The need to raise interest rates to keep a floor under the
dollar must therefore be balanced against the need to keep rates low so as
to not destroy the economy and the consumer. While the jury may still be out
on the end game the Fed will pursue, there is no doubt in my mind as to what
their only option will be. The intertwined nature of interest rates, exchange
rates, debt levels and policy errors of the past leave the Fed stuck between
a rock and a harder rock, with little choice but to choose inflation. In the
end, this course of action will destroy the same dollar the US has in the past
fought so mightily to preserve.
When this cold reality finally dawns on people, there will be a crisis in
world financial markets where, much like a bully on steroids, the only question
will be what degree of damage we sustain, rather than whether any damage will
be inflicted. Of course, there is no way to know when the unraveling will begin.
Like the late night hockey playoff game that runs into overtime, a viewer would
have a hard time predicting in advance the exact moment a goal may be scored.
However, there should be no doubt in his mind that he will have this information
when he awakens the next day.
Lastly, for the sake of thoroughness, and well aware that to avoid a crisis
new buyers of US assets must be found, perhaps this journey deep into the debt
ocean is a calculated effort, seeing as how we might run out of buyers for
US currency and bonds here on dry land. Like Captain Nemo's thirst for new
discoveries in the brilliant novel by Jules Verne, or others exploring the
deep sea for advanced life forms, are we, as my broker likes to ask, searching
for intelligent life elsewhere in the hope that we could sell themsome
US dollar assets? High hopes in that respect would certainly explain our full
steam ahead in continued debt creation. If we somehow discover intelligent
life actually willing to purchase US dollar assets, a rather miraculous accomplishment
in itself, let us hope they are a god fearing species. At the very least, they
could always turn to prayer when all hell breaks loose.
|