|
Protectionism is on the rise in the U.S. - can we afford it? If we tell
our trading partners that their money is not welcome, they should be excused
if they invest elsewhere. Because of its massive current account deficit,
the United States must attract over US$2 billion in foreign investments every
day to keep the dollar from falling. To illustrate why we should be concerned
about a potential decline in the dollar, look at inflation: just about everything
around us has been getting more expensive, except for the goods we can import.
As the dollar falls, inflation - and with it interest rates - may pick
up significantly.
As China sold over $200 billion more in goods to the U.S. than it acquired,
its foreign currency reserves swelled to over $800 billion (not just US dollar
reserves). Foreigners have had an incentive to keep their currencies weak to
promote exports to the United States. Rather than merely buying U.S. Treasury
securities, foreigners have shown an increased appetite for real assets. At
the same time, with politicians instilling xenophobia into Americans, isolationist
sentiment has grown. With mid-term elections later this year, politicians across
the political spectrum jump at the opportunity to stir the paranoia; even some
moderate commentators have referred to the trend as jingoism.
DP World, the United Arab Emirate (UAE) based port operator, has given up
its quest to gain control of numerous US port terminals. Never mind that the
previous owner was also a foreign firm; never mind that DP World has the best
reputation in the business; never mind, that, according to the Wall Street
Journal, "more than 60% of the container terminals at the nation's
10 busiest ports are at least partly managed by foreign operators, and in some
cases, companies controlled by foreign governments. That figure rises to 80%
at the biggest ports..."
Foreigners do not vote, so why bother stepping up for them? Labor Secretary
Elaine Chow put it bluntly: "We are after all a debtor nation!" (interview
on CNBC March 10, 2006). Not only that, but she also confirmed that between
22 and 29 million jobs in the US are dependent on trade. Rarely has the US
been so vulnerable. One of the beauties of the US economy is that it can adjust
to new environments: a lot of businesses facilitate trade these days. If trade
barriers are imposed now, then we have not only lost the manufacturing base
through outsourcing, but will destroy the jobs of those who have been able
to adapt. We should have learned our lessons from the Great Depression: there,
protectionism deepened the hardship on people. Today, we are just at the beginning
of an economic downturn - a downturn few economists even acknowledge
at this stage - and we are already playing the blame game.
Last summer, the Chinese controlled oil conglomerate CNOOC was in the media
as it tried to acquire US-based Unocal. There, too, the political firestorm
that resulted caused CNOOC to abandon the deal. It shall be noted that CNOOC
was only interested in non-US assets with no direct impact on oil produced
for the US market. At the time, we published a cynical note entitled "China: U.S. Dollar may not be Worth the Paper it is Printed
on" - the essence of the article was: if you can't buy
anything of use with your dollars, why bother holding them? Indeed, the Chinese
have since ventured beyond the U.S. to secure their natural resource needs
in Canada, Latin America and Australia. Last year, China has started to partner
with India on some acquisitions. And in Africa, China has provided development
aid in return for increased access to natural resources.
There may well be room for improvement in the process of how international
transactions are approved. But rather than squarely blaming foreigners, it
may be helpful to start by evaluating domestic policies that have contributed
to creating unprecedented liabilities to US consumers, have accelerated outsourcing
and made the US dependent on foreign capital.
Protectionism is not a US invention; indeed, globally, there are increased
calls for protectionism. France is well known to "defend" its home
industry. The European Union may import tariffs because Asian sneakers are "too
cheap". China plays its own games - most recently, it warned steel
importers not to bid up prices; steel exporters, such as Australia, have protested.
Argentina, well known for high quality beef exports, has announced a ban on
beef exports in an effort to contain domestic inflation.
Some say the US faces little risk in alienating the rest of the world - with
huge investments in US Treasuries, foreigners have more to lose than to gain
from turning their back on the US. We agree that it is unlikely that foreigners
would overnight sell all their US holdings and cause a panic. However, the
US is dependent on foreigners investing in US assets at a rate of over $2 billion
every day to keep the dollar from falling. Changes in investment allocations
only need to happen at the margin to hurt the US dollar. The US is certainly
trying very hard to encourage foreign investors to reconsider; these efforts
are "bearing fruit": on March 12, the UAE central bank said it
was looking to convert up to 10 percent of its foreign exchange reserves from
dollars into euros - double the target it had previously set. The reserves
have previously been held almost entirely in dollars.
We manage the Merk Hard Currency Fund, a fund that seeks to profit from a
potential decline in the dollar. To learn more about the Fund, or to subscribe
to our free newsletter, please visit www.merkfund.com.
|
Axel Merk
Axel Merk is Manager of the Merk Hard Currency
Fund
The Merk Hard Currency Fund is a no-load mutual fund that
invests in a basket of hard currencies from countries with strong monetary
policies assembled to protect against the depreciation of the U.S. dollar relative
to other currencies. The Fund may serve as a valuable diversification component
as it seeks to protect against a decline in the dollar while potentially mitigating
stock market, credit and interest risks - with the ease of investing in a mutual
fund.
The Fund may be appropriate for you if you are pursuing
a long-term goal with a hard currency component to your portfolio; are willing
to tolerate the risks associated with investments in foreign currencies; or
are looking for a way to potentially mitigate downside risk in or profit from
a secular bear market. For more information on the Fund and to download a prospectus,
please visit www.merkfund.com.
Investors should consider the investment objectives,
risks and charges and expenses of the Merk Hard Currency Fund carefully before
investing. This and other information is in the prospectus, a copy of which
may be obtained by visiting the Funds website at www.merkfund.com or calling
866-MERK FUND. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest.
The Fund primarily invests in foreign currencies and
as such, changes in currency exchange rates will affect the value of what
the Fund owns and the price of the Funds shares. Investing in foreign instruments
bears a greater risk than investing in domestic instruments for reasons such
as volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic
focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets.
The Fund is subject to interest rate risk which is the risk that debt securities
in the Fund's portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market
interest rates. As a non-diversified fund, the Fund will be subject to more
investment risk and potential for volatility than a diversified fund because
its portfolio may, at times, focus on a limited number of issuers. The Fund
may also invest in derivative securities which can be volatile and involve
various types and degrees of risk. For a more complete discussion of these
and other Fund risks please refer to the Fund's prospectus. Foreside
Fund Services, LLC, distributor.
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2008
SafeHaven.com
« BullionVault.com
-- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money:
A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo »
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|