|
Philippine President GM Arroyo's move to lend an ear to the Catholic Bishops
to pave way for a "review" of the mining statute has elicited some concerns
among some investors.
The Catholic Church has been openly opposed to the revival of the mining sector
due to "environmental" concerns and this, in my view, has prompted several
prelates to explicitly call for her resignation using the "legitimacy" issue
as camouflage.
PGMA's resolve to open communication channels with the influential Catholic
Church is obviously a political ploy to "damage control" or reverse the declining
tide of her political stock.
Nonetheless, considering the cash strapped position of the government plus
the potential revenues it can generate, aside from broadening influence of
resource-based geopolitics, the renaissance of the mining industry will unlikely
be forestalled by the whimsical and baseless impositions of the myopic, self-righteous
and socialist leaning Catholic Bishops.
The emerging risks in the mining industry has been on the aspects of "nationalization" (Venezuela,
Bolivia, Zimbabwe), and/or increase in royalties or government share on mining
revenues (Chile). While we have seen similar protests lodged by the Church
in several Latin American countries, governments have not curtailed mining
activities but instead increased its participation by either increasing equity
on projects or demanding higher take on revenues. In short, it's all about
money.
In the Philippines, there is "nothing to nationalize" or nowhere to demand
for an increase in shares of revenues simply because there is hardly an industry
to speak of. In a speech delivered to the Asian Mining Congress in 2004 former
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Michael Defensor noted
that there are "only two (2) big mines in operation. Added to these are three
(3) medium-scale chromite mines, four (4) medium-scale nickel mines and five
(5) medium-scale gold mines with fifteen (15) cement plants and quarries at
work."
On the revenue side, when one speaks of generating US$61.4 million from excise
taxes, and US$432 million in Corporate taxes annually, such magnitude makes
the industry too compelling to ignore as to write it off for the sake
of unjustified bugaboos (Mining admittedly has some negative environmental
impacts but doesn't "destroy life"~ pure bunk!). In essence, given the resource
rich potentials of the country, no matter who sits as President (even a Prelate!)
will be compelled to harness the revival of the industry for financial and
economic purposes. The $64 question is, how it would be done (open to foreign
investors, or government instituted).
Moreover there is the issue of geopolitics.
Rising commodity prices, which have been the outgrowth of investment and macroeconomic
cycles compounded by the ramifications from collective government policies,
is here to stay for sometime. Some market experts have even been suggesting
that the present cycle could even last until 2050 based on the Kondratieff
(Soviet economist Nikolai Kondratieff) rising long wave cycle count which spans
from 45 to 60 years peak to peak! Analyst Martin Spring quotes Kenneth Rogoff,
professor of economics at Harvard, "For at least the next 50 to 75 years, prices
for many natural resources are headed up."
This means that securing resources as oil, natural gas, copper, gold, silver,
molybdenum to soft commodities (agriculture) will increasingly be the driving
force behind geopolitics!
In the words of Dr. Marc Faber (emphasis mine), ``when markets are glutted
and over-supplied, no one is going to fight in order to satisfy his demand.
Conversely, when markets are characterised by acute shortages, people will
fight and go to war in order to secure their required supplies,
particularly when the shortages that might arise or that have already arisen threaten
the physical and economic survival of the groups or countries involved."
What this means is that there would be intense pressures from extraneous forces
to revive our resource based industries such as the mining industry, (whether
the Catholic Bishops like it or not). For example, I expect the Chinese government
to ante up their presence towards shaping local politics (e.g. the aborted
attempt to buyout UNOCAL by China's CNOOC was a purported backdoor play to
Asia's energy resources, the current $400 million North Rail project from Caloocan
to Malolos could be one of the icebreakers). To the extent that chronic shortages
of a particular commodity could possibly pose as a casus belli (for an invasion)!
In short, the revival the mining industry is simply inevitable for as long
as current commodity dynamics prevail. Either we will open the industry and
benefit from it through trade, or someone will eventually do it for us.
Finally, we should let the market speak for itself. While the present developments
may give an investor anxiety over the consistency of policies adopted by the
present regime, the financial markets will tell us whether these concerns are
treading on valid grounds based on the collective psychology of investors represented
by price values. Since the announcement of PGMA to "review" the Mining Act,
the performance of local mining companies listed abroad has been mixed, Sur
American Gold <CA:SUR> soared 26.67%, Mindoro Resoures <CA:MIO> down
-3.66%, Philex gold <CA:PGI> surged 37.5%, TVI Pacific <CA:TVI> fell
6.67% while Pearl Asian Mining <PAIM>slumped 33.33%.

Figure 1: Philippine Mining Index
Meanwhile the Philippine Mining & Oil Index posted a hefty 7.86% advance
this week, the best performer among sectoral indices in the Philippine Stock
Exchange as shown in Figure 1. As far as the markets are concerned, there are
certainly no strains of a policy reversal.
|