|
Gold traded over $600 during Thursday's session, closing at $599.70 in New
York. Since $600 gold has been getting a fair amount of news coverage, let's
examine the reasons being trotted out to explain the rising gold price.
A Bloomberg
article points to investment fund buying as a main factor driving recent
price strength. Also discussed was the "inflation risk" that makes holding
gold more attractive for investors, especially in an environment of low real
rates. A surprisingly credible argument for gold's strength managed to make
its way into the article: "The market perceives an inflation risk, although
it hasn't shown up in some of the government statistics," said Michael Cuggino,
portfolio manager of Permanent Portfolio Fund in San Francisco. "Low to
negative real interest rates after inflation are generally bullish for gold."
Unfortunately, Bloomberg's report did not end on such a sensible note. Another
source weighed in with the following remarks, "We're entering bubble territory,"
said Christoph Eibl, head of commodities trading at Zug, Switzerland-based
Tiberius Asset Management AG., which has holdings in energy, metals and agricultural
commodities. "Prices have moved away from reality, and are no longer linked
to fundamentals."
I find that last comment to be a bit absurd if it was made in specific reference
to gold. Certainly, one could say that commodities in general have undergone
an astounding advance, and it is possible that certain commodities now carry
a speculative premium in their price (as discussed by Dr. Marc Faber in a recent howestreet.com interview).
However, I think it is odd to declare, in a discussion centered specifically
on gold, that prices are "no longer linked to fundamentals" when the recent
chain of events (and the metal's current strength against most major currencies)
clearly suggests the opposite.
As mentioned in the Bloomberg article, investment demand has come on strongly,
and investment purchases of gold have outstripped jeweler purchases so far
this year. This in itself is huge. Where was investment demand for gold just
a few short years ago? Not long ago, most people looked at you cross-eyed or
at least gave you the third degree questioning when an investment in gold was
suggested. Since gold crossed $500, a new attitude has begun to replace the
former stance of suspicion. The small cadre of dedicated goldbugs hoarding
bullion and gold coins has been enlarged to include an investor class that
gets its exposure to gold through ETFs and precious metals-focused funds. A
change in sentiment is clearly underway as the investing public and investment
professionals increasingly warm to gold.
Not only is investment demand up in North America, it is profoundly evident
in Asia and the Middle East. The people of India and China have traditionally
been buyers of gold, in the form of jewelry and as a store of savings. Their
purchases will only increase over time, as their economies continue to develop
and prosperity levels rise among the masses. Middle Eastern demand is pronounced
as ever, with the Gulf economies prospering from a recent oil boom and the
resulting flood of new money. An ongoing repatriation of funds previously held
abroad, and the establishment of the Dubai Gold Exchange, have no doubt also
encouraged gold purchases. Meanwhile, a sizeable increase in Gulf central bank
holdings of US dollar reserves have led some to consider diversifying out of
the dollar and increasing the region's central
bank gold reserves as Russia, Argentina and China have done.
There will not be an easily mineable influx of supply to meet this demand.
Gold mining companies face a dwindling resource base and rising
costs in extracting gold from the ground. Consider the environmental hurdles
and permitting difficulties associated with bringing on new mines in many jurisdictions,
along with the increasing push
for nationalization of "strategic resources" in Latin American countries,
and it becomes a little unclear as to where all this gold will be found.
These facts are not being expressed in the mainstream US business press.
Rather than give due weight to the big picture trends driving the gold price,
most coverage derides the advance as being speculative in nature. But is that
a surprise? A current CNN Money article reads, "$600
gold: Want in? Think twice". While the article dutifully describes several
options for prospective gold investors and the risks associated, it ends in
a dissuading tone. "Not everybody could handle losing 40 percent in one
year...Most people probably don't need an investment in precious metal funds."
I guess it's just one more brick in a wall of worry.
|