|
In the previous commentary entitled "A
new age of perpetually high oil/gas prices?" we examined some of the
factors behind the fuel price spike and how it is being carefully managed
by the oil oligopoly. In this installment we'll look at how violence in the
Middle East and elsewhere is contributing to the rising oil price trend and
also the connection between oil and the U.S. dollar.
A gentleman responding to my previous commentary made this very thoughtful
observation: "It seems to me that higher oil prices are offsetting reduced
Asian support for the US bond market. Windfall profits of the OPEC, especially
Mid-East producers, are turning up as Treasury purchases via U.K. and offshore
intermediaries (to avoid potential asset seizure in the event of hostilities,
I presume). Thus, a tax (higher oil prices) on U.S. consumers gets recycled
back into the bond market, which in turn supports the dollar. A corollary effect
is that higher prices force more spending of Asian dollar reserves, which would
also feed into this petro-dollar recycling scheme."
The above comments are definitely worth investigating and I think we'll find
an answer to them as the year progresses. We'll all be able to observe the
dollar/oil/bond connection and get some sense of where the links are further
down the road. Food for thought to be sure.
Apparently there is still quite a bit of resistance out there to the idea
of the oil oligopoly managing petroleum output and thereby controlling the
price trend. Is it so hard to believe that oil companies have conspired to
create artificial shortages for the purpose of driving up prices at the pump?
An anonymous observer made waves back in late 2004 when he published photographs
he had taken out in California of a gasoline tanker truck unloading its contents
into the desert sands. The concerned citizen promptly sent copies of the photos
to the oil company from whose truck the gas was being purposely dumped. He
later received this response: "You didn't see what you thought you saw...what
you thought you saw was something you didn't actually see."
A Shell refinery in Bakersfield, Calif., made headlines in back in '04 when
it closing down despite having the biggest refiner margins of any Shell refinery
in the nation and despite a dire need for more gasoline supplies in the state. "Only
an oil company that wants to short the market and artificially drive up the
price of gasoline would demolish a highly profitable refinery rather than sell
it," said Jamie Court, president of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer
Rights in response to the move at that time. Truly, the motives of the erstwhile "seven
sisters" (which have now been further consolidated through industry intermarriage)
can be clearly seen through actions such as these.
In reference to the above headline, there is of course a connection between
the price of oil and violence in the Middle East. The violence is both a consequence
of the oil and a contributor to the higher oil price. As one commentator asked
rhetorically, "Would the U.S. be in the Middle East if there wasn't oil there?" Indeed,
U.S. military occupation of Iraq and, before long, Iran, is primarily an economic
motivation as are most things in this world.
The connection between the oil price trend and the trend toward death and
violence in the Middle East is stronger than you might think. In a previous
commentary I showed you the correlation between the gold price and the Global
Bombing Index (GBI), which in turn reflects the worldwide trend toward bombings
on a daily basis. The increase in bombings, mainly in the Middle East region,
has been one of the most frightening and relentless trends of 2006. To better
show the rate of change in this non-stop upward trend I've constructed a series
of short-term rate of change (momentum) oscillators which show the peaks and
troughs along the bombing cycle for the year to date.
There has been an observable correlation between the troughs in the global
bombing cycle and subsequent upward trends in the bombings and the oil price.
Since the beginning of this year, whenever bombing momentum has bottomed and
then turned up sharply higher it has triggered an oil price rally. The higher
the move in the global bombing momentum, the higher the oil price has rallied
(or at least remained near recent highs). You can see the extreme spike in
the latest global bombing momentum in the update chart below. Not surprisingly,
oil made a recent high near $75/barrel.

The recent spike in 20-day bombing momentum as reflected in the above chart
is reminiscent of a temporary peak of the short-term trend. At least that's
how it would be interpreted in a classical momentum oscillator. Admittedly,
GBI and its momentum derivatives are still quite young and relatively untested,
especially considering that it's not measuring price at all but rather militant/political
activity on a global scale. Nonetheless, my hope is that this huge spike in
20-day bombing momentum represents at least a temporary peak in the recent
bombing trend, which up until now has been head-spinning.
It would do us well to pause and reflect on the human aspect behind this soulless
indicator. While the global power brokers may look upon bombings as an opportunity
to raise prices ("Buy when there's blood in the street" is the old Robber-Barron's
refrain) this relentless rising trend underscores the enormous loss of human
life in just the past four months, especially in the Middle East. The number
of bombings as reported by the BBC since the year began has now exceeded 150
on a global scale. The death toll based on the reports in the BBC since January
number at least 1,203. This doesn't include the number of victims injured by
the bombings.
Think about that for a minute. One thousand, two hundred and three deaths
in only four months from bombings alone! That doesn't even count the deaths
from gunfire and other war-related activities. At the current rate, if this
pace is maintained over the rest of the year it would bring the bomb-related
death toll to approximately 3,600. Can you imagine if this bombing trend persists
for another 2-3 years (much like the oil price trend has)? Or longer? Or if
war escalated into Iran and other Mid-East regions? These statistics would
argue that it's high time for U.S. officials to reconsider their country's
military presence in the Middle East.
On a (hopefully) more positive note, it has been observable in recent days
that a rash of news headlines have focused on the ire and outrage many Americans
are feeling right now over the exorbitant fuel prices. One such headline that
crossed the news wire today read, "Voters Sour on Gas Prices: Pump pain fueling
Congress, Bush woes." This being an election year will no doubt bring the oil/gas
situation into sharper focus. In the past two years whenever the oil/gas price
trend starts making the headlines, especially when involving consumer outrage,
a temporary respite (emphasis on temporary) for consumers is usually near.
Let's hope that this time will be no different.
|