|
Following yesterday's retail sales report a Bloomberg headline read, 'S&P
500 Futures Gain on Retail Sales'. The speculation at the time
(8:31 AM) was that a weaker than expected retail sales report was "rekindling
optimism the Federal Reserve may soon end its string of interest-rate increases." Not
surprisingly, as US stocks opened lower Fed 'pause' optimism vanished, and
by the closing bell slumping dollar/booming commodity price fears had been
found. The Dow ended the day down by more than 100 points for only the fourth
time this year, and - in what is a rare occurrence - bonds also lost ground.
Accordingly, for the first time in a longtime the speculation that money moved
out of equities and US dollars and into the 'safe haven' realm of precious
metals can be made. What an ominous speculation this is...
While the mainstream press would have you believe that yesterdays sharp decline
in equities was solely in response to increasing commodity prices, and that
when the Fed finally 'pauses' the Dow will resume its attack on record highs,
the reality is that many once distant clouds are not so distant any longer.
For example, if the outlook from technology kingpins Intel, Cisco, Dell, Microsoft,
and others is any guide (it was in 1Q00), the long awaited slow down in corporate
earnings is extremely close. Moreover, if statistical and anecdotal information
on the US housing market is any guide, the long awaited slow down in housing
has already arrived. That technology earnings are expected to grow less rapidly
and the housing ATM machine is in disrepair is cause enough for concern. But
wait, there is more:
US Interest Rates Keep Rising
The normal response to steep declines in US stock prices is that 'safe haven'
money moves into bonds. As a quick example of this trend, since 2000 the Dow
has declined by more than 140 points on 131 different occasions (the latest
such instance taking place yesterday), and during these sell-offs bonds (10YT)
were also down less 20% of the time.
While yesterday's decline in bonds can be partially explained by a weak 10-year
note auction, not to mention a hefty supply of corporate paper, rising commodity
prices are the more obvious culprit. In light of the fact that US retail sales
came in soft, the larger speculation to be taken from this action is that a
weakening US economy may not necessarily produce an immediate decline in US
interest rates. Such a shocking speculation has not been made in nearly 20-years.
So, tech stocks are suggesting earnings slow down, the US housing market has
peaked, and US interest rates are taking their cues from commodity prices instead
of stocks and the US economy. If these items of interest were not terrifying
enough, there is even more:
US Dollar Hegemony Being Tested
Mr. Roach is encouraged that the IMF and G-7 have recognized that 'global
rebalancing' must involve a weakening greenback. He is also optimistic that
a USD decline will "be measured and orderly", and that a dollar crisis can
be averted. With Japan and China hardly embracing stronger currencies and precious
metals giving the declining dollar a great big hug, Roach's new found optimism
could prove misplaced. Quite frankly, with Bernanke unable to convey some semblance
of policy directionality, some older Roach (Sept
30, 2005) is worth rehashing at this time:
"Greenspan, of course, will not be there to pick up the pieces. That unfortunate
task falls to his successor -- whomever that may be. History tells us that
even under the best of circumstances, transitions to a new Fed chairman are
fraught with peril. Financial markets are quick to test the new central banker.
That was certainly the case when Alan Greenspan took over in August 1987
-- the stock market crashed two months later. That was also the case when
Paul Volcker became chairman in August 1979 -- the bond market quickly tanked.
And the onset of G. William Miller's brief tenure in March 1978 ushered in
a dollar crisis. Just from that perspective alone, there's good reason to
worry about the markets in early 2006. But there's an even greater reason
to worry about the coming transition to a new Fed chairman. Courtesy of bubble-induced
distortions that Greenspan condoned, today's saving and current-account disequilibria
dwarf anything that a new chairman has had to face in the past. The average
net national saving rate that Miller, Volcker, and Greenspan inherited was
7.4%; today it is 2% and likely to be a good deal lower in early 2006. Similarly,
America's current account deficit averaged -1.5% of GDP in the three most
recent Fed chairmen transitions; today, it is closer to -6.5%.
In the end, America's current-account funding problem remains very much
a confidence game..."
If these are the 'end' times, the conclusion to be made is that the only thing
investors seem 'confident' about is that the US dollar is headed lower. To
be sure, instead of cheering a falling US dollar as being part of the remedy
to an unbalance world, investors and fund managers are selling US stocks, buying
commodities, and pushing precious metals up against all major currencies (to
be fair, the trend of 'selling stocks' is only 1-day old).
Without dwelling on Roach's flip-flopping, consider what Paul Kasriel has
to say. Although Kasriel was referring to Greenspan's luck with interest rates
in the article below, his line of reasoning also comments well on US Dollar
movements.
"Just as President Clinton enjoyed the "sweet spot" of geopolitical history
in the post-WWII era, I believe that Fed Chairman Greenspan has enjoyed the
sweet spot of inflation history. Volcker left Greenspan a great inflation
hand to play. Greenspan is more likely to leave his successor a hand similar
to that which Miller inherited from Burns. Government spending is on the
rise for as far as the eye can see. The U.S. indebtedness to the rest
of the world is high and will be rising as far as the eye can see. U.S. policymakers
will attempt to lessen the impact of this indebtedness on the standard of
living of Americans by running Fed Governor Bernanke's greenback printing
press overtime. At first, this will induce foreign central banks to speed
up their printing presses as no country right now wants a strong currency.
This will lead to global reflation. Later, however, foreign central banks
will get that anti-inflation religion again. This will lead to a run on
the dollar and a sharp acceleration in U.S. inflation." August
22, 2003
Given that global reflation has lead to global tightening, not to mention
that as the US dollar declines inflationary pressures are threaten to accelerate,
Mr. Kasriel's insights from nearly three years ago have been spot on.
But why are central banks tightening when traditional inflationary pressures
are not apparent/hidden in the government statistics? Because with paper currency
wildly chasing stocks, emerging market investments, commodities, and to some
extent still real estate, speculative bubbles are at threat of appearing all
over the place. And when these speculative bubbles burst the underlying bubble
that supports the entire structure - paper - could itself be at threat. As
a gauge of this threat M3 may be gone, but gold is
here.
So, tech stocks are suggesting slow down, the US housing market has peaked,
interest rate uncertainty abounds, and the trot out of the US dollar is threatening
to cannonball into a run. Things look pretty bleak. But wait, there is one
more thing to consider:
Fed Pause is Coming!
When Bernanke presses the pause button popular wisdom says that US stocks
will embark upon a record setting relief rally. While this could happen
and temporarily stop the clouds noted above from drawing even closer, there
is another scenario to consider: Bernanke pauses because the US economy goes
bust.
It is difficult to be certain what a sharp slow down in the US economy would
mean for US interest rates, the US dollar, and commodity prices (logic says
lower interest rates and falling commodity prices). However, what can be said
is that a slowing US economy is not a good thing for corporate earnings, and
along with the 'pause' speculations earnings are all that is holding US equities
up.
Investor's should keep in mind that during these uncertain times 'news' events
can take on dual meanings (i.e. falling commodity prices could be briefly cheered
by equity investors until it is unveiled that prices are dropping because the
US economy is in recession). How long does it take for investor optimism relating
to a Fed 'pause' to evolve into slow down fears? Apparently less than 1-hour:
by the time the morning bell rang yesterday Marketwatch was claiming that the
weaker than expected retail sales report was hurting stocks.
|