|
What are the best combination of trend indicators for juncture recognition
in the gold/silver stock sector? Are there any actively traded representatives
of the precious metals stocks that can be used as leading indicators for the
identification of shifts in trends? If so, what are they? In this article we'll
try to answer these questions using examples from the recent past.
From a trend following approach, the best tools to use for identifying new
trends in the gold/silver stock sector -- as well as spotting reversals of
prevailing trends - can be found by monitoring the price action of four leading
indicators: the XAU gold/silver index, the Amex Gold Bugs Index (HUI), Freeport
McMoRan Copper & Gold (FCX) and Silver Standard Resources (SSRI). One of
the important tools to use when following the action of these stocks and indices
are the 60-day and 90-day moving averages. But just as important is to compare
the action of these four in relation to the others. Doing so often yields valuable
leading indications for trend reversals or trend confirmations. We'll look
at some examples of how these four indicators can be used to generate useful
trading signals.
In early December 2004 the XAU broke below its 90-day moving average for a
period of several days. This followed a peak of 110 made in late November.
During this period of time Amex Gold Bugs Index (HUI) and Freeport Gold (FCX)
also peaked and broke below their respective 90-day moving averages, thus confirming
that a top of at least short-term significance had been made. The rule of thumb
seems to be that whenever the XAU and HUI indices along with FCX all close
below their respective 90-day moving averages at the same time (after a sustained
uptrend has been underway) then a top is signaled which is usually followed
either by a downside correction or a lateral consolidation usually lasting
several weeks.

Why is the 90-day moving average so important in confirming reversals of trend?
One reason could be that the 90-day moving average combines the outlook of
two very important intermediate-term cycles, namely the 30-week and 40-week
cycles. (Keep in mind that moving averages isolate the half-cycle component
of any given cycle so that a 20-day moving average, for instance, is tracking
the 8-week cycle (40 days) as opposed to a 4-week (20 days) cycle.) But the
main consideration when using the 90-day moving average is that it simply does
an excellent job most of the time in reflecting both the underlying trend,
bias and momentum behind a given stock or index. And when several stocks or
indices within an industry or sector break below the 90-day MA simultaneously
it shows that forces are at work that a trader cannot afford to take lightly.
Back to the November-December 2004 peak in the XAU. The leading indication
of this top came not from the most widely followed gold stocks but from a leading
silver stock. Silver Standard Resources (SSRI) had peaked at a high around
$16.50 at the end of September that year and then fell to a low of $13 by the
beginning of November, violating its 90-day moving average in the process.
This early warning gave a "heads up" on the coming top in the gold stock sector
as measured by XAU and HUI.

The leading silver shares usually peak and bottom at important turning points
before the gold shares do. The white metal itself is quite sensitive to shifts
in the interim trends among the precious metals and can be consulted when looking
for potential trend reversals in gold.
Returning to our example of Silver Standard Resources, SSRI fell from its
high of $16.50 in late September 2004 to a low of about $10 in April 2005.
After reaching this area in April '05, SSRI started a bottoming process around
the $10 level that continued until about mid-May, at which points SSRI reversed
higher and signaled that its corrective decline from late '04 had ended and
a recovery rally was born. During this same period (April-May 2005) the XAU
index was still declining and didn't reach its correction low until about mid-May
'05. The preliminary bottom in SSRI was made almost a full month earlier than
the XAU's bottom, and there were many positive divergence signals in the internal
indicators for SSRI (i.e., higher highs and higher lows) relative to the price
line which also signaled a "heads up" that a bottom was being made.
At tops, SSRI usually precedes the XAU in turning down, sometimes leading
the XAU by as much as 4-6 weeks. SSRI can also precede the XAU by being the
first to bottom and, sometimes, by being the first to turn up after the bottom
in commencement of a new upward trend. One of the best all-around leading indicator
for confirming that both tops and bottoms have been made in the XAU, however,
is FCX. By watching the action of FCX a trader can gain valuable clues as to
the most likely direction the gold stock sector will move in.
Now let's fast-forward to October 2005. This you may recall was a period when
many gold stock traders were becoming bearish on the short-term outlook for
the sector and many expected a decline to lower lows to take place in the XAU
and HUI indices. From a chart standpoint both the XAU and HUI had temporary
peaked in late September and gradually edged lower through the latter part
of October, briefly touching the 90-day moving average but staying above it.

If you were watching only the action of XAU and HUI alone you might have been
misled into thinking this was bearish price activity. But had you been watching
the action of Freeport Copper & Gold (FCX) at the same time you would not
have been so misled, for FCX actually stayed above its 90-day moving average
in October '05 and actually made a high above the late September peak by the
end of October to send a positive confirmation signal when compared to the
XAU and HUI indices. This is yet another of many instances when FCX has been
a reliable leading indicator for the gold stock sector at important trading
junctures.
To give another example of how the FCX often precedes the XAU at both tops
and bottoms we'll journey back to December 2003. At that time Freeport had
been in a long and uninterrupted momentum uptrend since May of that year. It
rose from approximately $18/share in early May up to a high of about $46 in
early December '03. By later that month, however, FCX had slightly penetrated
beneath its 60-day moving average to warn of a possible top formation. After
a minor rally to a lower high in early January, FCX once again broke below
the 60-day MA and then broke below its 90-day moving average by mid-January
2004. This was the confirmed top signal.
The lower high FCX made in early January 2004 coupled with the break below
the 60-day and 90-day moving averages was the leading indication that the XAU
index was likewise headed for a fall. Once again, if a trader had merely fixed
his attention on the action of the XAU alone without consulting FCX or another
leading indicator he would have possibly been fooled into thinking that the
trend was still up, for the XAU index actually made a slightly higher high
in early January '04 even as FCX made a lower high. Moreover, the XAU did not
break below its 60-day moving average in December '03 as FCX had done.
By mid-January 2004, three of the four leading gold/silver stock indicators
(XAU, HUI and FCX) had all broken below their 90-day moving averages to confirm
that a top had been made and warning that a potential decline would follow.
The decline that materialized took the XAU from its early December 2003 high
of 112 to a low of 77 in early May of 2004.
This is yet another example of why it's important to use the leading indicator/confirmation
approach when trading the gold/silver stock sector. The XAU index by itself
can sometimes provide trend indications but for consistently reliable signals
over time it's best to use the combined action provided by the XAU and HUI
indices along with FCX and PAAS.
|