|
I'm getting a lot of commentary mileage out of the May CPI report. On Wednesday,
I wrote about the CPI data themselves. On Thursday, I wrote about CPI-adjusted
retail sales, noting how weak they are in the second quarter. And today, I
will pen a comment about the CPI-adjusted M2 money supply. Chart 1 shows the
year-over-year percent change in this version of real M2. In May, the year-over-year
growth retreated to 0.55% from its recent peak in April of 1.34%. At 1.34%,
real M2 growth is weak. At 0.55%, real M2 growth is downright anemic. In Q4:2000,
just before the onset of the 2001 recession, year-over-year CPI-adjusted M2
growth was 2.55%. I know that real M2 growth is now considered passé as
an indicator of monetary policy or as a leading indicator. The Fed never mentions
it, not even St. Louis Fed President Poole, a former member of the monetarist
Shadow Open Market Committee. But for some odd reason the Conference Board
chooses to keep PCE-price-adjusted M2 money supply in its index of Leading
Economic Indicators. I suppose the odd reason is because the correlation between
the Conference Board's real M2 growth and real GDP growth is a not-too-shabby
0.60% (see Chart 2). So, we've got real M2 growth and the flat yield curve
both suggesting that monetary policy is restrictive and the Fed on June 29
will raise the funds rate again. I can hardly wait to see how fast and by how
much the consensus lowers its second-half real GDP growth forecasts after the
advance Q2 real GDP data are released.
Chart 1

Chart 2

The Chinese Central Bank Joins The Tightening Club
Today the People's Bank of China (PBOC) announced that it was raising bank
reserve requirements by one-half percent. Assuming that the PBOC does not create
the extra reserves that will be demanded because of the increase in required
reserves, Chinese monetary policy will have effectively been tightened. Unlike
in the U.S., the Chinese central bankers do pay attention to money supply growth.
After slowing to "only" about 14% in the second half of 2004 and the first
half of 2005, Chinese M2 growth has since re-accelerated to the 18% to 19%
range (see Chart 3). The Chinese government imposes price ceilings on a lot
of goods, so reported Chinese consumer inflation remains low - less
than 1-1/2%. But effective consumer price inflation is undoubtedly high. In
addition, there is inflation in real estate - asset price inflation. The PBOC
also is concerned that easy credit conditions are contributing to economically
unjustified municipal investment activity. Skilled labor shortages are
developing and the rising costs of raw materials are eating into corporate
profit margins. In short, the Chinese economy is overheated because of cheap
central bank credit. I would not be too surprised if this reserve requirement
hike is the prelude to some significant revaluation of the yuan. If so, this
could lead to some generalized weakening of the dollar in relation to other
Asian currencies. In turn, this could complicate Fed policy over the remainder
of the year in that a significantly weaker dollar might prevent or terminate
early a Fed pause.
Chart 3

The Real News In The U. of M. Attitudes Survey
The University of Michigan released its preliminary June survey of consumer
attitudes. Tomorrow's newspaper headlines will read something like:" Consumer
Sentiment Rebounds in Early June." Chart 4 shows the month-to-month behavior
of the index of Consumer Sentiment. Does the early-June rebound look significant
to you? Can you even see the rebound from 79.1 to 82.4? Do you notice that
the index remains below the nadir of the last recession? No, the real news
is that consumers' inflation expectations decreased in early June. Their one-year
ahead inflation expectations dropped from May's 4.0% to 3.4%. And their 10-year
ahead inflation expectations dropped from May's 3.2% to 3.0%. As you recall,
the Fed has been obsessed with inflation expectations of late, even mentioning
how survey-based expectations had risen. Well, this survey is showing inflation
expectations moving lower. Along with an economy that is losing altitude at
a rapid rate, this backing off of consumers' expectations of inflation could
be another argument for a Fed pause after it delivers its 17th consecutive
FOMC meeting funds rate hike on June 29.
Chart 4

|
Paul L. Kasriel, Director of Economic Research
The Northern Trust Company
Economic Research Department
Positive Economic Commentary
"The economics of what is, rather than what you might like it to be."
50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60675
The information herein is based on sources which The Northern Trust Company
believes to be reliable, but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness.
Such information is subject to change and is not intended to influence your
investment decisions.
Copyright © 2005-2008 The Northern
Trust Company
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2008
SafeHaven.com
« BullionVault.com
-- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money:
A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo »
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|