|
Compared to the tens of trillions of dollars invested in global bonds and
stocks, it's still the $80 billion invested in commodity funds that is getting
most of the attention these days. The direction of commodity markets, particularly
for crude oil, copper, and gold is setting inflation expectations in the global
bond markets, and clueing central bankers for their next moves on interest
rates.
The latest 20% plunge in the kingpin crude oil market to below $60 per barrel,
has whacked commodity fund investors, but has been a blessing for most stock
markets included in the Morgan Stanley World Index. On the other hand, the
resource heavy Australian and Toronto Stock Exchange, and emerging stock markets
in Brazil, Russia, and South Africa, would be at risk from a prolonged slide
in commodities.
Commodity currencies, such as the Australian and the South African rand, which
have strong ties to base metals and gold, are under selling pressure, and the
Canadian Petro-dollar is losing its luster, due to sharply lower oil prices.
Gold and silver have been held hostage to crude oil, and many traders are wondering
whether the latest plunge in oil is linked to US election politics.
But with the Reuters Commodity Index (CRB) flirting with the psychological
300-level, led by crude oil, copper, and gold, the big unresolved questions
are (1) whether the sharp drop in commodities is heralding the onset of a major
global economic downturn, led by the US housing market, or (2) maybe just a
speculative shakeout, and if so, (3) how long will the latest shake-out in
commodities last?
(Click on link below to hear an October 6th interview with Mr. Dorsch, who
answers questions on the global economy, gold, crude oil, interest rates, stock
markets, and foreign currencies).
www.fantalklive.com/archives/TBF_10052006.mp3

Until recently, the Reuters Commodity Index was tracking the MSCI World Index
for the previous four years, led by a 5% growth rate for the global economy,
and surging demand for raw materials in China and India. Commodities typically
rise when global growth and consumption are strong and decline when the world
economy sinks. If so, the recent plunge in commodities might suggest the global
economy is in for some rough sledding in the months ahead.
Global Capital Markets Celebrate Lower Oil prices
However, stock markets in major oil importing nations, such as Germany and
the US, are singing a happy tune, celebrating the latest 20% energy tax cut.
The sharp decline in crude oil prices from $75 to $60 per barrel, if sustained,
would cut the US oil import bill by roughly $4 billion per month and the German
import bill by $1 billion /month. German and US bond yields have also dropped
by 40 to 60 basis points since mid-July, as inflation pressures receded due
to sharply lower oil prices.

The latest plunge in the Reuters CRB Index also highlights the wizardry of
central bankers over global markets, when they act in lockstep for a common
goal. By tweaking their short-term rates higher, central bankers from a dozen
different countries, succeeded in frightening commodity speculators, but lifted
the spirits of bond and stock market traders. The debate in the US bond market
has now shifted to when the Federal Reserve will start lowering the fed funds
rate.
The recent slide in crude oil prices to 7,000 yen per barrel has eased inflation
fears in the Japanese bond market (JGB's), knocking the 10-year yield from
2.00% in mid-July to as low as 1.62% last week. The Bank of Japan has ended
its radical policy of "quantitative easing" (pegging interest rates at zero
percent, and flooding banks with an excess of 26 trillion yen), and helped
to wipe out some of the speculative froth in international oil prices, through
the partial unwinding of "yen carry" trades.

However, Japan's new prime-minister, Shinzo Abe is opposed to further BOJ
tightening moves, which would push JGB yields upwards towards 2.00 percent. "Increases
in interest rates would have a big effect on the government's debt interest
payments. We have to keep a close watch on their moves." Japan had 765 trillion
yen in sovereign marketable securities, or $6.5 trillion, outstanding at the
end of June, compared with $4.3 trillion in the US Treasury market.
The latest 0.3% drop in 10-year JGB yields lowers Tokyo's debt-servicing costs
by 480 billion yen ($4.1 billion). The latest 20% drop in world oil prices
also reduces Japan's oil import bill by $1.9 billion per month. However, Japanese
banks, which own 140.4 trillion yen ($1.24 trillion) of JGB's, roughly the
size of Canada's economy, might want to unload JGB's, if crude oil holds support
at 7,000 yen /barrel, and rallies higher after OPEC lowers oil output.
The Evaporation of the Iranian "war premium"
In retrospect, but the plunge in crude oil from $75 per barrel to $60 /barrel,
is linked to the evaporation of a $15 per barrel Iranian "war premium," that
was built into prices earlier this year. The energy sector, including crude
oil, unleaded gasoline, heating oil, and natural gas, accounts for 39% of weighting
within the Reuters CRB index. Thus the post August 8th plunge in the CRB index
is probably a speculative blow-out of over extended long positions in crude
oil, base and precious metals.
The majority of oil traders now think the Bush administration is just a "paper
tiger", and has discarded the military option against Iran. Instead, mired
with a 37% approval rating, President George Bush appears resigned to a protracted
diplomatic process with Tehran, and dabbling with cosmetic sanctions that have
little potency. So without the credible threat of a US military attack on Iran,
energy prices began to feel the gravitational pull of hefty US energy stockpiles.
US crude oil inventories rose to 8-year highs of 346.7 million barrels in
April 2006, yet crude oil prices continued to climb towards $80 per barrel.
US oil companies were hoarding oil, worried about supply interruptions from
unstable places, such as Iraq, Iran, Nigeria, and Hugo Chavez's Petroleos de
Venezuela. Yet the last time US oil stockpiles were as high as 346.7 million
barrels, the price of crude oil was trading between $15 and $20 per barrel
in 1998.

Recently, Iran has been in secret talks with European Union foreign policy
chief Javier Solana, attempting to split the EU from Washington's drive for
economic sanctions. But on Oct 4th, Solana indicated that Tehran had not agreed
to halt its enrichment of uranium, despite four months of discussions. "If
anyone thinks talks can be used to pressure us they are wrong," declared Iranian
president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Oct 4th. "The Iranian nation, in its path
to obtain nuclear technology, will not be stopped even for a second. Nuclear
technology is our obvious right."
Iran has sewn up the Chinese and Russian vetoes at the United Nations, leaving
US diplomacy at a dead-end. Iran may give China and Russia access to its giant
Azadegan oilfield, which contains 26 billion barrels of proven oil reserves,
and 6 billion of probable reserves, in return for blocking UN sanctions over
its nuclear weapons program. France's Total Fina hopes to secure a small stake
of about 15% in Azadegan, after French president Chirac spoke out against UN
sanctions.
In a blow to Tokyo's hopes for enhanced energy security, oil company Inpex
revealed on Oct 6th, that Japan's stake in the Azadegan field had been cut
to 10% from the 75% share agreed in February 2004. Japan expected to pump about
260,000 bpd from Azadegan, equal to just over 5% of its imports. Azadegan was
to have been the jewel in Japan's overseas oil holdings, helping it keep up
with China and India's aggressive state-owned companies, now scouring the globe
for energy resources to feed their fast-growing economies.
Talks between Iran and China's Sinopec 0386.HK, in developing the Yadavaran
oilfield, are expected to be completed in two months, said deputy Iranian Oil
Minister Mohammad Hadi Nejad Hosseinian on Sept 26th. Yadavaran has estimated
reserves of about 3 billion barrels and is expected to produce 300,000 bpd,
roughly the same volume of crude that China now imports from Iran.
Testing the Resolve of the OPEC Cartel
On Sept 22nd, Saudi oil chief Ali al-Naimi tried to stabilize oil prices at
$60 per barrel, with verbal jawboning which sparked a brief bounce to $64 per
barrel. "Prices now are rewarding to both producers and consumers and their
impact on the global economy is small. The most important gauge for this price
is that it does not have a big negative impact on the global economy," said
Naimi. But the rebound was short-lived, and oil prices were again sliding under
$60 per barrel a few days later.
Then on Oct 3rd, OPEC President Edmund Daukoru called for output cutbacks,
after US oil prices tumbled below $59 a barrel, their steepest drop in oil
prices in 15-years. Nigeria and Venezuela withdrew a combined 170,000 bpd from
their production from Oct 1st, but the cuts represented less than 1% of OPEC-11's
daily supply. Instead of restoring stability, Nigeria and Venezuela only succeeded
in communicating to the market that they were worried about a supply glut.

But on October 4th, Kuwaiti Oil Minister Sheikh Ali al-Jarrah al-Sabah indicated
the oil kingdom might join Nigeria, Iran and Venezuela in cutting its oil output
if prices continue their steep drop below $60 per barrel. "Kuwait may voluntarily
lower oil output in order to maintain the market's stability. We are currently
in negotiations with fellow OPEC members. The current situation with prices
and the big retreat that has taken place is uncomfortable for OPEC nations," al-Sabah
added.
The Kuwaiti oil minister said "$60 per barrel for US light crude is a comfortable
price, but $50 /bl is worrying." On October 8th, following an extra ordinary
telephone conference, OPEC agreed to a deal to remove 1 million barrels a day
of crude from oversupplied markets, as ministers lined up to support the cut.
Iran and Algeria publicly backed the reduction, OPEC's first since December
of 2004.
"I think there is more or less consensus for 1 million bpd," said OPEC President
Edmund Daukoru. "The reference point is the official 28 million bpd ceiling." Algerian
Energy and Mines Minister Chakib Khelil said there was consensus to lower output. "This
would have a positive impact on the market. What is important is that the market
finds the OPEC position credible. That is why it is necessary to have a meeting
to make a decision on the cut and to act on it," Khelil said.
Election Politics and Crude Oil
It is interesting to note, the last time OPEC cut its oil output in a meaningful
way in December 2004, was to defend US oil prices from falling under $40 per
barrel. Today, OPEC seeks to stabilize crude oil prices at $60 per barrel.
Despite the 50% increase in oil prices since October 2004, the Dow Jones Industrials
is 20% higher. OPEC knows the world economy can expand at $65 to $75 per barrel,
so the cartel doesn't see any reason why prices should fall too much further.
Do oil prices and election politics go hand in hand? In the last run-up to
US elections in 2004, a surge in crude oil prices from $44 per barrel on Sept
16th 2004, to as high as $55.25 on October 26th 2004, had knocked the Dow Jones
Industrials 500 points lower to the 9750-level, and according to CNN polling
data, President Bush's 7% lead over John Kerry soon swung into a 3% deficit.

For much of 2004, gyrations in the stock market revolved around polling data.
When Kerry pulled ahead of Bush, the stock market turned lower, and vice versa.
When the Dow Jones Industrials fell below the psychological 10,000 level to
as low as 9750 in October 2004, with only 7-days left before Election Day,
the Kerry camp was jubilant, since Wall Street pros were apparently pricing
in a Bush defeat.
But fortunately for Bush, the price of crude oil did a 180 degree reversal,
and tumbled 10% to $49.50 /barrel in the final week before the elections. The
Dow Industrials rebounded above the 10,000-level, viewed by pollsters as Wall
Street's red line between a Bush or Kerry victory. The last minute drop in
crude oil, combined with a Dow rally, might have helped Bush to a 51% to 48%
popular vote victory.
Republicans trying to hold onto their seats on November 7th are also hoping
for a bit of good luck. Will a 70 US-cent per gallon drop in gasoline prices,
and Friday's report of a 4.6% US jobless rate, the lowest in 5-years, do the
trick in 2006?
Gold market held Hostage to Crude Oil
Since peaking at $675 per ounce on July 14th, three rally attempts by gold
bugs have fizzled out, and were ultimately wiped out by sliding oil prices.
On October 3rd, gold briefly fell below $570 per ounce, after crude oil tumbled
below $60 per barrel. Gold was also spooked by fears that European central
bankers would dump 180 tons of gold from mid-July until Sept 26th, to meet
their full quota of 500 tons per year.

Instead, the European central banks limited their sales of gold to 73 tons
on the spot market in the final two months, for a grand total of 393 tons,
falling short of their full quota for the first time since 1999. But the London
Telegraph published an October 7th reporting that the Bank of France sold up
to 100 tons of gold through forward contracts in September, knocking the yellow
metal below $600 per ounce.
Also, Amaranth Advisors, a hedge fund manager lost billions of dollars in
energy trades in the summer, and was liquidating its remaining positions at
fire-sale prices. Amaranth estimated its net asset value declined by 65% to
70% during September, after suffering a $6 billion loss in wrong-way bets on
natural gas derivatives, including $560 million in one day alone. Aramanth's
dumping of energy contracts indirectly contributed to gold's slide towards
its June lows.
At the moment, the gold market is hovering above $570 per ounce, supported
by signals that OPEC intends to cut its daily oil output to defend the US crude
oil price at $60 per barrel. Gold's initial reaction to Pyongyang's detonation
of a nuclear bomb was muted, gaining just $3 /oz in New York, after trading
$10 /oz higher in Asia. Nowadays, geo-political tension only seems to benefit
gold, when it involves a major oil producer, such as Iran, and impacts the
price of crude oil.
Pyongyang Detonates the Bomb, Jolts Korea and Japan
Three years of six-party talks with Pyongyang, simply led to North Korea's
detonation of a nuclear bomb on October 9th, 2006. It's no secret that North
Korea has a small arsenal of nuclear weapons, but it was a bit of a surprise
to see Kim Jong-il pull the trigger. China has been North Korea's main supporter,
since its army saved it from defeat by US forces under a UN flag in the 1950's.
Beijing provides 90% of N Korea's oil supply, estimated at one million tons
per year.
But this time, China might have overplayed the North Korean card. The specter
of an Asian atomic arms race now looms over the region, and Beijing could find
itself surrounded by neighbors in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan moving to
join the elite club of nuclear powers. Japanese prime-minister Shinzo Abe,
a staunch North Korea critic, wants to amend the Constitution to give Japan's
military greater leeway to go nuclear, and it won't take long to convert its
huge stockpile of plutonium.
Similarly, 3-years of negotiations between the big-3 European powers and Iran
have only brought Tehran much closer to obtaining the technological knowledge
to build a nuclear bomb. It is certainly possible that Pyongyang would share
its nuclear know-how with Iran, in return for a sizeable financial reward.
While Iran has only started to produce fissile material, North Korea has done
so for at least five years. The next nuclear weapons test could be conducted
by Iran.

But traders in South Korean stocks and the won have prospered under the dark
shadow from the North, since Pyongyang first disclosed its nuclear arsenal
to the world in April 2003. The Korean Kospi index has more than doubled from
3-½ years ago, while the US dollar has plunged by 250-won, or 20%, during
the same time period. In the past, sell-offs ignited by worrisome news from
Pyongyang, were simply new buying opportunities for foreign and local investors.
At its peak, foreign investors owned 43% of outstanding shares on the Korean
Stock Exchange. But foreign investors' sold a record 9.3 trillion won of Korean
stocks between May 1st and August 16th, to own just 38% of the market's capitalization.
Domestic individuals and institutions filled the void, but after October 9th,
local money might be the only hope for the optimist in the Korean stock market.

Not surprisingly, Kospi blue chips and the Korean won, were shaken by Pyongyang's
detonation of the nuclear bomb. The benchmark Kospi Index lost 2.6% to the
1,316-level, after falling as much as 3.6% earlier. The US dollar jumped 15-Korean
won to close at 964-won in Seoul, partly in reaction the dollar's Friday advance
of 1.15-yen to 119.15-yen. Japan and Korea are fierce competitors in global
markets, and currency traders in the Korean won track the Japanese yen.
While North Korean blow-ups have usually ended up as a chance to buy South
Korean shares at a cheaper price. Behind the scenes, the Bank of Korea inflated
the M2 money supply at a 9.3% annualized clip in August, marking the fastest
gain in nearly 3-½ years, helping to buoy local stocks and counter US
dollar weakness against the won. The BoK is expected to leave its 4.50% loan
rate unchanged on October 12th, to soothe jittery markets.
All Eyes on US Economy and Housing Sector
Despite the euphoria of a new record high for the Dow Jones Industrials, the
US economy, which accounts for 28% of global economic output, is at risk from
a weaker housing market. The pace of existing US home sales fell for a fifth
straight month in August, hitting a 6.3 million unit annual rate. US home prices
fell to $225,000 in August, or 1.7% lower from a year earlier, and the first
annual decline since April 1995. The inventory of existing homes for sale rose
1.5% to 3.92 million units, or a 7.5 months supply, a 13-year high.
A year ago, homeowners were enjoying double-digit price gains and were tapping
voraciously into their home equity to finance spending. In 2005, refinancing
and cash outs against home equity totaled $550 billion, and exceeded the US
after-tax gains in wages of 375 billion. Any back-to-back decline in home prices
of more than two months would be unprecedented in the US, and could indicate
a deep slump in the housing market and consumer spending that could take several
quarters to play out.

"I would estimate that slowing housing construction will probably take about
a percentage point off growth in the second half of this year and probably
something going into next year as well," said Fed chief Ben Bernanke on October
6th. But the Fed is not expected to cut rates in the fourth quarter to support
home prices. "The inflation rate is still above what we would consider price
stability," Bernanke added.
"The housing sector is going through a painful, but necessary, adjustment
and has slowed overall growth somewhat," said Philly Fed chief Charles Plosser
on October 5th. "But the expansion is still on firm footing and growth is
likely to accelerate in 2007. We need to remain vigilant and recognize that
maintaining the current stance of policy, or even firming further, may be in
the best interests of the economy's long-run performance," said super-hawk
Plosser. "The predominant risks facing the economy now are on the inflation
side."
Fed vice-chief Donald Kohn backed Plosser's views on October 6th, "To date,
there is little evidence that this correction in the housing market has any
significant adverse spillover effects on other parts of the economy. Resources
freed up in the residential market appear to have been largely absorbed in
nonresidential building. Lower oil prices should also bolster spending and
offset spillover effects from the housing market," Kohn said.
"As the inventory overhangs in residential housing and automobiles are worked
off, economic growth should pick up again to a rate closer to the growth rate
of its potential. In the current circumstances, the upside risks to inflation
are of greater concern," citing rising labor costs, which grew at a annualized
7.7% rate in the second quarter," a hawkish sounding Kohn warned.

But the recent slide in US home prices is leaving Americans feeling a little
less wealthy, and in turn, is limiting consumer spending and dragging on growth.
The ISM index of the US service sector fell to 52.9 in September, the lowest
since April 2003, from 57 in August. Readings below 50 indicate a contraction
in industries that account for almost 90% of US gross domestic product.
In the past, the ISM service sector index acted as a good leading indicator
for the S&P 500 index, but that wasn't the case in the third quarter of
2006, when US blue chips climbed a wall of worry. The US stock market is thriving
in a goldilocks environment, where bad economic news translates into ideas
of Fed rate cuts, and corporate buybacks of outstanding shares injects more
cash into the market.

From 2001 thru 2004, housing and related sectors accounted for more than 40%
of US private-sector payroll growth. But since Fed rate hikes began to undermine
home builders in late 2005, the housing and related sectors account for less
than 15% of private-sector payroll growth. That has been an ominous trend for
the US economy. As housing has tapered off, new-job creation has shrunk.
The US economy created just 51,000 jobs in September, but Labor department
apparatchniks jigged the August figures upward to show a 188,000 gain, or 50%
higher than originally reported. The jobless rate fell to 4.6%, matching a
five-year low. And in another shocker, the Labor Department said payrolls for
the 12 months ended in March 2006 will be revised higher by 810,000, the biggest
revision since 1991. Currently, figures show 1.8 million jobs were added
during that time.
Still, the technical picture for the US jobs market looks bearish, and might
be headed for net job losses, (after the November 7th Congressional elections).
China's Economy is linked to the US housing market
China's economy expanded at annual rates of about 10% between 2002 and 2005,
a period corresponding with booming Chinese exports to the US, and turned China's
economy into the fourth-largest in the world by the end of 2005. But if the
US housing oversupply is met by a too-tight Fed in 2007, it could weaken US
demand for Chinese imports, and submerge Chinese economic growth into single-digits.
Beijing has relied on exports, primarily to US consumers, to drive its double-digit
economic growth. Between 2001 and 2005, China's average annual rate of export
growth was 25%. Exports grew by 35% in 2004 and 28% in 2005. Including goods
re-exported from Hong Kong, exports to the US accounted for 50% of total Chinese
exports. Thus, Chinese export growth is largely determined by US demand.

Exports accounted for 40% of China's economic growth in 2005. And because
almost all of China's exports are consumer goods, external demand also plays
a key role in the growth of foreign investment in China. Foreigners invested
$73 billion in new factories and other investments in China over the past 12-months,
and the global economic outlook could impact up to 65% of decisions for new
expenditures.
Thus, a US economic downturn in 2007, could have a strong negative impact
on China's economy, and rattle other Asian exporters in Australia, Japan, and
South Korea. The chain reaction of a US economic downturn could also be felt
worldwide, when one considers that 20% of European exports are earmarked for
the US, and China's sales of 86.9 billion Euros in the first six months made
it the #2 exporter to Europe, just under the US's 89.8 billion Euros.
No Early Signs of a Chinese Economic Slowdown
Yet despite recent monetary moves by Beijing to rein in its M2 yuan money
supply, there are scant signs of a slowdown in China's booming economy or stock
markets. China's purchasing managers' index rose sharply to 57.0 in September,
compared with 53.1 in August, signaling accelerating in growth in the manufacturing
sector. The backlog of new orders was 10% higher in September from July.
Mainland China's exports rose to a record $90.77 billion in August, up 32.8%
from a year earlier, helping the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index, which tracks
37 mainland companies, to close at 7128 on October 6th. Hong Kong stocks closed
at fresh six-year peaks on October 5th, fuelled by a record high in the Dow
Jones industrials, and global bellwether HSBC Holdings #5.HK, hit an all-time
high.
Hong Kong purchasing managers' index (PMI) also rose to 53.7 in September,
the highest reading since May, from 51.6 in August, and marked the 21st straight
month of expansion. Exporters stepped up hiring to cope with new orders from
mainland China. Global demand for high-technology products made and assembled
in Asia, helped Hong Kong's key re-export trade. Almost 95% of Hong Kong's
exports are re-exports of goods made elsewhere, often in mainland China.

Shortly after the Hong Kong Monetary Authority matched the Fed's last rate
hike on June 29th, by lifting its base rate 0.25% to 6.75%, Hong Kong's 10-year
bond yield fell sharply from 4.98% to as low as 3.89% on Sept 26th. The sharp
decline in HK 10-year yields produced an inverted yield curve, with 10-year
yields falling to as low as 40 basis points below Hong Kong's one-year Libor
rate.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority generally follows in lockstep any interest
rate adjustments by the Fed, to keep the HK$ stable at 7.8 per US dollar. Local
bond traders are pricing in HKMA rate cuts to follow similar Fed rate cuts
in early 2007. However, Hong Kong's three biggest banks, Hong Kong & Shanghai
Banking, Hang Seng Bank #11.HK, and Bank of China Holdings, #2388.HK left their
prime lending rate at 8.00% last month. The Hong Kong banking system is flooded
with local-currency funds, which are driving inter-bank Libor rates sharply
lower, giving HK banks wider margins from commercial lending, and boosting
their share value.

The flood of liquidity pushed Hong Kong Libor rates to 4.22% last week, or
1% below comparable US$ Libor rates, the deepest discounted yield in 13-years.
This situation has arisen because mainland Chinese companies have not repatriated
the proceeds from major stock offerings launched in Hong Kong. Meanwhile, Chinese
households, who have stashed away some $2 trillion in deposits, are snapping
up local bank stocks, viewed as a proxy for the country's 10% economic growth.
Beijing has been staging a series of progressively larger initial public offerings
for its big-Four banks, favouring Hong Kong for IPO's of its state-run businesses.
The Bank of China launched an $11.2-billion offering in June, and China Merchants
Bank, a smaller player, listed its $2.4-billion IPO last month. On Oct 27th,
the Industrial & Commercial Bank of China launches a $19 to $21 billion
IPO of its shares, beating the previous record set by Japan's NTT DoCoMo in
1998.
ICBC is the largest bank in the world's most populated country, with $815-billion
in assets spread among 18,000 branches. Last year, bank lending in China increased
9.7%, and was up another 10.4% in the first half of 2006 alone. Kuwait's Investment
Authority is bidding for $720 million worth of IBCB shares while Qatar Investment
Authority is targeting a stake worth $205.5 million.
The Canadian Petro-dollar and Toronto blue-chips
Soaring base metals and energy prices have been key factors in the Canadian
dollar's 40% rise against the US dollar in the past four years. Nearly 54%
of Canada's exports are made-up of commodities, which account for 12% of its
C$1.09 trillion economy, the eighth largest in the world. Canada's oil sands
in Alberta contain about 174 billion barrels of oil, the largest crude deposits
outside the Middle East, and have attracted large sums of investment capital
from abroad, boosting the Canadian petro-dollar towards the psychological 90
US-cents level.

Cross-border mergers and takeovers were a big part of the Canadian dollar's
strength this year. In the first half of 2006 there were 360 cross-border transactions
totaling C$80.2 billion, up from 222 transactions worth C$43.3 billion in the
first half of 2005. Sharply lower base metal, gold, and oil prices since August
8th, have stymied the Canadian dollar's 4-year rally, but the Loonie has yet
to fully adjust.
Canadian exports have been a key driver behind the performance of the Toronto
Stock Exchange. The Loonie's resiliency near 90 US-cents could drag on Canada's
economy and result in a loss of export market share in the US, which buys 85%
of Canadian exports. Canada's non-energy trade balance has been in a deficit
position for the past four months, while its auto trade skidded to a record
deficit in July.

Yet Bank of Canada Deputy Governor Paul Jenkins said a cooling US economy,
led by a downturn in the housing market, is being offset by an upturn elsewhere
in the world, and that will help Canada weather the storm. "The rates of growth
in the US were unsustainable, but even with the slowing in the US growth, what
we are seeing is stronger growth in the rest of the world. For Canada, you've
got to do that global add-up, you can't look at just what's happening in the
United States," he argued.
South African Rand at 3-½ year Low, as metals Tumble
South Africa's rand plunged to a 3-½ year low of 7.86 versus the US
dollar on Oct 3rd, has slumped by about 22% on a trade-weighted basis since
the start of 2006, knocked lowered by falling gold and platinum prices, and
negative sentiment towards South Africa's gaping current account deficit. South
Africa is the world's largest gold and platinum producer and the rand often
moves in step with the precious metal. The correlation between gold and the
rand was 81% this past year.

The Reserve Bank of South Africa (RBSA) has already lifted its repo rate by
1% to 8% since June to stem the rand's decline, but the rand remains on a slippery
downward slope, and a further RBSA half-point rate hike to 8.50% at the next
policy meeting on October 11th appears inevitable. The possibility of a one-percent
rate hike exists, or the bank could signal another 0.50% rate hike for December.
On Sept 14th, RBSA chief Mboweni, gave currency traders the green light to
hammer the rand, as a quick fix to correct South Africa's gaping current account
deficit. "The deficit we are seeing on the current account balance of payments
is partly the result of a rand exchange rate that might have been out of balance.
I think that exchange rate is now adjusting to the realities." Mboweni's comments
knocked the rand below 13.50 US-cents towards 12.8 US-cents, over the next
three weeks.

The exchange rate is "the quickest mechanism for rebalancing of external imbalances,
and the rate also done so in an orderly fashion, which is what everyone wants,
an orderly adjustment of imbalances," Mboweni said on Oct 2nd. South Africa's
trade balance is in deficit of -6.1% of gross domestic product, or twice the
rule-of-thumb acceptable level of 3 percent.
But the devaluation of the rand has sent South African producer prices sharply
higher. The PPI rose 1.5% from July to August, or 9.2% YoY, the highest since
December 2002, and far above 8.1% in July. Mboweni indicated that if the large
shortfall on the current account persisted for a long time, it would lead to
a weaker rand, fanning imported price pressures and force interest rates higher.

Mboweni said the high levels of credit extension had led to record household
debt of almost 70% of disposable income. "The high levels of consumer expenditure
have also contributed to the expanding deficit on the current account of the
balance of payments. These developments pose a threat to the inflation outlook," Mboweni
warned, sending an explicit signal of an RBSA rate hike for Oct 11th.
** If you enjoyed this article, consider a subscription
to the Global Money Trends newsletter published
on the 1st and 15th of each month in pdf format, and 20-25 pages in length.
GMT collects a wide array of news and information from reputable sources,
filters out the noise and distractions, and puts all the pieces of global
economic puzzle together into coherent snapshot analyses, with lots of
cool charts depicting the inter-relationships of markets and economies
around the world.
Here's what you will receive with a subscription,
Insightful analysis and predictions of, (1) top stock market indexes around
the world, and US-listed Exchange Traded Funds (ETF's) and closed-end country
funds. (2) Commodities such as crude oil, copper, gold, silver, the
CRB index, and gold mining and oil company indexes. (3) Foreign currencies such
as, the Australian dollar, British pound, Euro, Japanese yen, and Canadian
dollar. ($) Libor interest rates, global bond markets and their central
bank monetary policies.
A subscription to Global Money Trends is $110 US dollars per year
for 24 issues, including access to all back issues. Click on the following
hyperlink, to order now, http://www.sirchartsalot.com/newsletters.php.
This article may be re-printed in its entirety on other internet sites for
public viewing, with links to, http://www.sirchartsalot.com/newsletters.php.
|