|
Ever since the years of reconstruction after World War II Germans probably have
been the most pro-American people in Europe. There is deep admiration of the
American political and social order and great respect for American wealth and
military power which, in their judgment, was the paramount force that overwhelmed
the Nazi dominion. After the War the United States was the sole protector and
deterrent to a Soviet-communist sweep across Europe and, upon the Evil Empire's
disintegration, it readily supported German unification. Many Germans gratefully
remember the past.
While millions of people are demonstrating world-wide against a war with Iraq,
Germans are bitterly divided on the issue. Both major political parties, the
Social Democrats and the Christian Democrats, have come out firmly against
the war. Yet, many dissenters favor both military intervention and German participation
in the confrontation, if peaceful means to disarm Iraq should fail.
The official German position must be viewed in the light of politics which
is a simple strife of party interests masquerading as a contest of principles.
During last Fall's election campaign Chancellor Schröder cleverly distracted
the electorate from economic stagnation and rising unemployment by posturing
as the righteous advocate of international peace and harmony. He managed to
win a slim victory over an inept opponent. Since then his position and popularity
have fallen precipitously as economic conditions have deteriorated further.
Many Germans now view the situation as hopeless, which leaves them either depressed
or outrightly cynical about their country. The hopelessness finds expression
in their endless talk and prattle about the need of reform which, in their
world of thought, consists of a long list of painful and unacceptable alternatives.
All the reforms they envision call for personal sacrifices for the benefit
of others.
In a welfare society, such as the German, where the benefits and burdens are
the result of lengthy and bitter political struggles between various pressure
groups and social classes, change has many enemies. Industrial unions and business
associations have the legal right to set industry-wide wages, but they have
no responsibility for the unemployment they create. The workers they cast off
depend on the generosity of the welfare state. Labor law and jurisdiction protect
employed workers from their employers but utterly ignore the unemployed. Sadly,
many Germans now are convinced that, on their own, they are no longer able
to agree upon and carry out a reform.
To foreign economists the German dilemma is rather simple and clear: a crushing
burden of welfare expenses and regulations is dispiriting the working population
and depressing economic activity. Several layers of government are draining
approximately one-half of national income and regulating the rest. It is not
surprising that much German business capital is running and hiding from government
agents and tax collectors, seeking survival abroad. A heavy blanket of social
legislation and taxation is smothering the labor market. It reduces the gross
wage of an average German worker by 58 percent, consisting of social security
plus income taxes; a single person loses 67 percent. The exactions not only
increase the government share of gross national product but also further limit
individual decision-making. Political authority and know-how prevail throughout
the economy.
The German malaise has been growing ever since the socialists of old, now
called the Social Democratic Party, came to power in 1968. Taking advantage
of the economic "miracle" of recovery and reconstruction, which had
sprung from unprecedented economic freedom soon after the War, they immediately
returned to their old habits and mores, the political redistribution of income
and wealth. They fervently supervised, guided, controlled, and directed economic
life until the economy sank into deep recession. By 1982 industrial output
was stagnating, budget deficits were soaring, and unemployment reached a 30-year
high of some ten percent. Sadly, in just fourteen years in power the socialists
claiming to represent the working people managed to turn the "miracle
economy" into an ailing economy that deprived more than two million workers
of employment.
In October, 1982, the Christian Democratic Party returned to power with Helmut
Kohl replacing Chancellor Helmut Schmidt. In opposition they had opposed much
harmful government intervention; in control again, they soon fell prey to the
temptations of power. Ever fearful of the socialistic opposition, the Christian
Democrats learned to compromise, give and take, go halfway, which invited new
demands, new compromises, more demands, and more compromises until both parties
were barely distinguishable but for their names. In 1982, the last year of
Social Democratic administration, federal spending had soared to DM 258.8 billion;
in 1998, the last year of the Kohl Administration, it exceeded DM 1.67 trillion.
During Kohl's reign the federal debt rose from DM 317 billion to more than
a trillion. When Kohl assumed the office the rate of unemployment hovered about
ten percent; when he left it exceeded eleven percent, in East Germany, even
twenty percent.
The economic blunders of the Kohl Administration during the 1980s were eclipsed
by the gigantic mismanagement of the reunification of West and East Germany
after 1989. In essence, the Federal Republic of Germany bought the German Democratic
Republic and has been paying its citizens ever since. Year after year West
Germany has been transferring double-digit billion D-Mark amounts to the new
states. During the 1990s the German government spent about 10 billion U.S.
dollars or some $11,000 for every man, woman, and child in Germany. Never in
history has any region been subsidized so generously and continually as formerly
communist East Germany.
When federal, state, and city governments were virtually bankrupt and unemployment
throughout Germany reached a rate of 11.6 percent in 1998, German voters abandoned
the Christian Democrats en masse and reelected the Social Democrats, the very
architects of the German welfare state, together with a new minority party
of environmentalists called the "Greens". The Red-Green coalition,
as it is nicknamed, advocated an austerity package but immediately faced not
only a die-hard opposition within its own ranks but also the vocal critique
of many Christian Democrats. Yet, it managed to lower the top income tax bracket
from 51 percent to 42 percent; in order to appease the Greens in their midst,
it raised the taxes on gasoline. Ever faithful to its tradition, it boosted
sick pay, increased worker protection against layoffs, and strengthened labor
unions' role in corporate management. It did shy away from a reform of the
pension system which presently is supporting 47 retirees for every 100 workers.
Facing a rapidly aging population, the system envisions 104 retirees for every
100 workers in 2050.
In 2002 the Red-Green coalition started its second term as badly as it finished
the first. As the economy continued to stagnate and tax revenues decline, the
Red-Green administration sought to close the fiscal hole through boosts of
the income tax, new levies on inheritance, higher capital gains taxes, and
new taxes on equities. Soaring health and pension deficits are to be met with
increases in employer contributions. Politicians still talk about the need
for reform but there is little courage, deter- mination, and skill to press
ahead. Three-quarters of the Red-Green coalition in the Bundestag are members
or officials of labor unions; no political leader has the courage to fend them
off.
Germany will soon be the center of a 25-member European Union, its biggest
member with 82 million people, generating a fifth of its gross national product.
In ages past, her neighbors often feared her power and might. Today she is
a stricken giant, the sick patient of Europe, pitied rather than feared. Her
government recently suffered the indignity of receiving formal reprimands from
the European Commission for running a budget deficit of 3.8 percent of GDP,
exceeding the 3 percent limit under Union rules. German weakness is burdening
the Union and casting a dark shadow on the European currency. Reacting to foreign
criticism, the Schröder government may blame the poor showing on the approaching
Iraqi conflict or the rising Euro currency which places German exports at a
disadvantage. It is quick to point to the European Central Bank for its lack
of monetary stimulation lowering interest rates and thereby stimulating business
and consumer spending. It would love to see the currency depreciate, which
would lower the real cost of labor and thus hopefully reduce the unemployment.
Foreign observers of the political and economic situation in Germany may despair
about her future. As far as they can see they glimpse a welfare state that
produces ever more government exactions, regulations, and restraints. They
see a comprehensive system of political command, direction, dominion, authority,
jurisdiction, supervision, and charge. When an industry ceases to function
satisfactorily the government promptly tightens its grip and subsidizes the
loser. With the healthcare industry in loss and disorder, for instance, the
reformers are contemplating lowering drug prices by decree and freezing payments
to doctors by edict. Resisters and violators among druggists and doctors would
be prosecuted. When an important industry suffers painful losses but is unable
to readjust under the blanket of commandments it can always rely on subsidies.
They are a large item in the federal budget, presently amounting to 156 billion
euros (approximately $170 billion) per year or some 7.5 of GNP and 35 percent
of tax revenue. They are specifically designed to prevent painful readjustments
and keep old maladjusted industries alive.
Both political parties are ever eager to assist the feeble. They are unaware
that often we can help each other most by leaving each other alone. It may
be more charitable to leave an old industry alone than to assist and encourage
it in its losing ways, which merely prolongs the suffering. Standing ever ready
to interfere with a readjustment process, the politicians of both parties actually
may be guided by old notions and doctrines. While they may wax eloquent about
their great concern and compassion, yea, even Christian charity, they actually
may espouse socialistic theories of labor exploitation and class warfare. There
are few voices that answer them and hold forth on the virtues and benefits
of individual freedom and the private- property order.
Germany needs much more than a reform; it is in urgent need of a new economic
miracle, a reformation that liberates, emancipates, releases, discharges, and
unleashes the people. Liberty is never out of sight or out of bounds; it reappears
wherever man longs to be free.
|