|
Many financial advisers are sounding the alarm: "The forces of deflation are gathering strength and threatening to take over.
The stock market is pointing the way and the economy is following." Some
even are seeing signs of impending calamity: "The United States is staring
into the same deflationary abyss that has swallowed Japan. Debt is becoming
back-breaking and liquidity is drying up. Debt defaults are soaring and forced
asset sales are exacerbating the decline." Many media reporters are echoing
this reaction and attitude.
Deflation, according to these spokesmen of popular economics, is a decline
in the prices of goods and services, the reverse of inflation. Both give rise
to opposite effects: inflation is said to stimulate output and employment;
deflation always affects them negatively. Indeed, popular economics considers
deflation to be one of the most dreaded evils in the world today.
Popular economics is the offspring of genetically dissimilar notions, theories,
concerns, and interests. It may spring from old economic theories that are
popular and pleasing although misleading and erroneous. There are Keynesian
doctrines that explain depressions as "gaps" between aggregate production
and spending and, therefore, in order to fill the gaps, promote programs of
government spending on public works. There are old exploitation doctrines which
breed employer-worker confrontations and, hence, prevent efficient market adjustments.
There is an army of civil servants who never tire of espousing and promoting
popular economics because it assigns important economic functions to them.
There are countless businessmen who readily embrace fashionable economics because
it generally favors government regulation which, in turn, tends to reduce the
pressures of competition. And finally, popular notions and doctrines please
many people because they offer colorful descriptions rather than difficult
explanations of causal relations.
Economists view inflation and deflation in a different light. They search
for the very causes of rising or falling prices and, having ascertained the
origin, know how to avoid the evils. They need not look far for the very mainspring
of inflation: the increase in the stock of money by the monetary authority,
the Federal Reserve System. The System sets the pace by providing legal-tender
money; commercial banks and other financial institutions then add their fiduciary
money and credit, always keeping an eye on the authority. The people offer
or bid for money, which affects its purchasing power in the same way as it
influences the mutual exchange ratios of other goods. In short, demand
and supply determine its exchange value.
While the stock of money tends to increase continually at the discretion of
the monetary authority, the demand for money reacts rather slowly to changes.
It may vary radically, however, when people regard their economic situation
with fear and, therefore, significantly change their money holdings. The fear
of ever more inflation and monetary depreciation may give rise to a "flight
from money," which may produce double-digit or even triple-digit inflation.
The fear of a looming disaster or depression, on the other hand, may induce
people to cling to their money, which increases the demand for money, raises
its value, and thereby lowers goods prices. In the language of popular economics,
their reluctance to spend money may lead to deflation.
At this time in our "bubble" economy the fear of stagnation and
decline is increasing the demand for money and exerting a powerful downward
pressure on goods prices. It is rendering the expansion efforts by the Fed
and the U.S. Congress rather ineffective. In terms of popular economics, uncertainty
and fear are frustrating Fed efforts to "jump-start" the economy.
The Fed is"pushing on a string." It exerts ample control over banking
and credit institutions through a number of regulatory instruments such as
setting reserve requirements for member banks, determining the rate of discounts
and advances, and engaging in open market operations. But the Fed has little
control over the actions and reactions of millions of dollar holders throughout
the world. Their freedom to offer or bid for U.S. dollars is the ultimate variable
in monetary management and control. To the Fed it is an irritating and exasperating
restraint of its power over the people's money.
The painful pressures of economic stagnation despite strenuous Fed efforts
to inflate the stock of money must be seen in this light. The weight is keenly
felt in the world of capital goods where businessmen must make difficult employment
decisions. They often are the primary victims, easily misled by the Fed's recurrent
policy of stimulation through "easy money" and "low-interest" credit.
Misinformed and misdirected they embark upon costly projects and ventures which,
in a fever of soaring prices and costs, are found to be costly mistakes inflicting
painful losses. In the end, loss-inflicting projects need to be abandoned and
unprofitable labor be discharged. Businessmen are forced to hold on to their
money, which may develop the symptoms of deflation. Consumers are likely to
follow suit.
Economists nevertheless refuse to be alarmed by fearful prognoses of deflation.
They see instead a number of glaring inflation symptoms, such as rising commodity
and energy prices, that point to more inflation to come. Analysts focus on
U.S. fiscal and monetary policies that are highly inflationary and soon may
erase the deflation symptoms. They always look upon inflation as the root cause
of many economic evils, especially the cyclical instability. Deflation,
in their view, is merely an inevitable phase of a business cycle that is engendered
by inflationary policies; it is the final phase, painful but wholesome, as
it forces businessmen to readjust to the demands of the market.
The deflation symptoms may soon give way to the forces of inflation. Massive
imports of all kinds of goods still are keeping a lid on consumer prices. In
2002 Americans imported about $500 billion more than they exported, that is,
they consumed more than they produced, financing the deficits with U.S. dollars,
most of which remained abroad or were invested in U.S. government obligations.
The trade deficits and foreign dollar holdings exert powerful exchange-rate
pressures on the dollar which in recent months already lost more than 20 percent
versus the euro and may lose more in the future. Further U.S. dollar losses
are bound to reduce American imports, promote exports, and consequently raise
goods prices. In short, a declining dollar in foreign exchange markets may
soon rekindle the inflation fever.
The federal government itself faces budget deficits as far as the eye can
see. Tax revenues are down and expenditures, magnified by the war in Iraq,
are out of sight. Moreover, Congress may cut taxes, guided by the supply-side
assumption that tax cuts promote economic expansion and thereby generate additional
tax revenues which may offset and cover the earlier revenue losses. Unfortunately,
the budget deficits do not abide by supply-side notions. They surely would
raise interest rates and depress business investment, if they would consume
actual savings. But the Fed continues to collaborate by creating new funds
and reserves which enable commercial banks to offer their fiduciary credits.
Interest rates may remain steady or even decline, but they no longer signal
the true state of the capital market; they deceive and mislead investors, cause
new distortions and malinvestments, and prime the markets for more inflation
to come.
America's engine of inflation, the Federal Reserve System, hardly ever slows
down in its portentous endeavors. As of March 19, its present data, total Fed
credit rose $67.6 billion, or 9.6 percent, since a year ago. The broadest measure
of money supply, M3, which includes currency in circulation, checking accounts
balances, savings accounts and time deposits such as CDs and money market fund
balances held by institutions, may explain the Fed's fear of deflation -- it
is up only $473 billion, or just 5.8 percent. And producer prices have risen
only 3.6 percent since a year ago and consumer prices just 3 percent. The 9.6
percent Fed credit expansion is the starter fluid that is to jump-start the
American economy.
There is no deflation abyss that may swallow the economy. There never was
a bottomless pit which swallowed Japan or any other economy. But there are
abysses that swallow countries the governments of which conduct abysmal policies.
Political blunders and economic follies are depressing the Japanese economy.
Ever since the giant bubble burst in 1990 the Japanese government has tried
frantically to spend its way out of the recession, but it merely managed to
aggravate and prolong it. It sustained insolvent banks and insurance companies,
subsidized favorite industries, and always prevented needed corrections and
readjustments. Massive deficits continue to consume the people's savings, and
false interest rates sustain old imbalances and create new maladjustments.
The Japanese malaise is self-inflicted; guided by spurious notions and doctrines
Japanese politicians unbendingly and doggedly pursue baneful policies.
Declining prices do not call for contravening central bank maneuvers that
hopefully stabilize prices. Actually, whether the given stock of money is large
or small, it renders the desired exchange service. The popular notion that
an increase in the stock of money is socially and economically beneficial and
desirable is one of the great fallacies of our time. It has lived on throughout
the centuries, embraced by kings and presidents, politicians and businessmen.
It has shattered numerous currencies, inflicted incalculable harm, and caused
social and political upheavals. It springs forth, again and again, no matter
how often economists may refute it.
|