|
The Government Accountability Office, or GAO, is an investigative arm of Congress
charged with the thankless task of accounting for the money received and spent
by the federal government. As you might imagine, people whose spend all day
examining the nitty-gritty realities of federal spending and deficits might
not share the voters' enthusiasm for grand campaign promises.
David Walker, Comptroller General at GAO, has been on a speaking tour of the
U.S recently -- and he pulls no punches when explaining just how precarious
our nation's entitlement system really is.
He explains that Social Security and Medicare are headed for a train wreck
because of demographic trends and rising health care costs. The number of younger
taxpayers for each older retiree will continue to decline. The demand for "free" prescription
drugs under Medicare will explode. If present trends continue, by 2040 the
entire federal budget will be consumed by Social Security and Medicare. The
only options for balancing the budget would be cutting total federal spending
by about 60%, or doubling federal taxes.
Furthermore, Walker asserts, we cannot grow our way out of this problem. Faster
economic growth can only delay the inevitable hard choices. To close the long-term
entitlement gap, the U.S. economy would have to grow by double digits every
year for the next 75 years.
In short, Mr. Walker is telling the political class that the status quo cannot
be maintained. He is to be commended for his refreshing honesty and unwillingness
to provide excuses for the two political parties, the administration, or the
even the entitlement-minded American public.
I urge everyone interested to visit the GAO website at www.gao.gov,
where you can view a report entitled: "Our Nation's Fiscal Outlook: The Federal
Government's Long-Term Budget Imbalance." This report should be required reading
for every politician in Washington.
Are ever growing entitlement and military expenditures really consistent with
a free country? Do these expenditures, and the resulting deficits, make us
more free or less free? Should the government or the marketplace provide medical
care? Should younger taxpayers be expected to provide retirement security and
health care even for affluent retirees? Should the U.S. military be used to
remake whole nations? Are the programs, agencies, and departments funded by
Congress each year constitutional? Are they effective? Could they operate with
a smaller budget? Would the public even notice if certain programs were eliminated
altogether? These are the kinds of questions the American people must ask,
even though Congress lacks the courage to do so.
If we hope to avoid a calamitous financial future for our nation, we must
address the hardest question of all: What is the proper role for government
in our society? The answer to this question will determine how prosperous and
free we remain in the decades to come.
|