|

Investing in mining companies is a very risky yet potentially rewarding endeavour
as few properties that are explored ultimately develop into productive mining
operations.
Mines do not appear overnight. They take years to develop as they progress
through a series of different stages that can be broadly categorized as: explorer, developer,
and producer.
Companies closer to production are more highly valued that those just starting
the process and market participants should value each stage differently according
to the relevant data and issues present.
Explorers and New Discoveries
Any mineral deposit first begins with an initial discovery of an economical
resource. Early exploration companies are involved with new discoveries and
the subsequent drilling required to further define both the size and grade of
the deposit. Some early-stage explorers are concerned only with the discovery
of new deposits and have no intention of going into production. Instead, by
accumulating enough of these prospective properties they can make a handsome
profit by merely selling them to existing mining developers and producers.
Before any mineral deposit can go ahead it must have a preliminary feasibility
study completed by a qualified person. A qualified person as defined
by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM)
is an individual (engineer or geoscientist) with at least five years of relevant
experience that is a member in good standing of a Self-Regulating Organization.
This study, also known as a "prefeasibility" study, is concerned with the economic
viability of a project and outlines the inferred, indicated and measured
resources of the mineral deposit and the economically mineable probable and proven
reserves of the deposit.
It must include adequate information on the method of mining (open-pit or
underground), determination of an effective method of mineral processing, metallurgical,
economic, and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting,
that economic extraction can be justified.
The inferred resource estimates have a great deal of uncertainty as to their
existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility.
It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will
ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian law, estimates of inferred
mineral resources may not form the basis of a feasibility study.
A measured resource has a higher degree of confidence than an indicated resource.
More drilling and analysis is required before upgrading an indicated resource
to the status of a measured resource. Measured & indicated resources are
useful when considering the future potential of a mining project.
Just because a measured mineral resource determines how much of the mineral
is in the ground does not necessarily mean that all of it is currently economically
viable to extract.
The proven and probable mineral reserves are the economically mineable portions
of the measured and indicated mineral resources respectively as demonstrated
by at least a preliminary feasibility study. Proven & probable reserves
should be used when considering the current economic viability of a
mining project.
Developers and Realization of the Project
Developers are concerned primarily with three things: (1) securing the necessary
financing to bring the project into existence, (2) acquiring the permitting
and licences required under the local jurisdiction in order to begin operations,
and (3) construction of the project in a timely manner.
To complete these objectives, detailed engineering and environmental studies
are conducted. All geological, operating, economic, political and environmental
factors are considered in sufficient detail that it can reasonably serve as
the basis for a final decision by a financial institution to finance the
development of the deposit.
The permitting process can often be a source of unexpected delays and is perhaps
the most frustrating of the stages due to the fact that it lies outside of
the control of the mining company and depends on government officials to process
and approve.
An estimate of the payback period, cash cost per unit of mineral
being mined, internal rate of return (IRR), net present value (NPV)
and a timeline of the project should be made available during this stage.
These figures are of great concern for an investor to consider. Additional
factors to take into account are:
1. Will the company have sufficient funding? Mines require large upfront capital
costs followed by years of little or no return. The company may issue additional
stock in the form of private placements that have the effect of diluting the
stock price in order to raise capital. An investor needs to be prepared for
these occurrences.
2. Challenges associated with working in remote locations. What infrastructure
is available in terms of access and power generation? Will the ore be milled
onsite or does it need to be transported to another location?
3. When is the anticipated production start date? Typically, mining exploration
and development accelerates during times of high commodity prices. Those mines
that first get into production will be able to sell their product at a higher
price than those that follow as the supply increases. Therefore, it is paramount
to be able to select high quality mines that are scheduled to go into production
near the peak of a commodity cycle in order to maximize profits.
Mining Company Producers
Mining companies that are in the production stage can be valuated more similarly
to traditional businesses. Like any other industry, producing mining companies
face traditional risks associated with business but the following factors need
to also be carefully considered:
1. Political instability and/or threats of nationalization in developing nations
such as we see in Venezuela, Zimbabwe and Bolivia.
2. Labour disputes over wages and safety issues concerned with operational
hazards.
3. Fluctuating metal prices and foreign currency exchange rates that can greatly
affect profitability in a short time.
4. A mine is what's termed a wasting asset in that it loses value over
time. Producing mining companies need to allocated some spending to the acquisition
of future properties or further development of existing ones.
In Conclusion
There are no magic numbers by which to valuate a mining company. Whether the
company is an explorer, developer or producer should have a great impact on
how much the market capitalization should be relative to the size and quality
of the deposit. A useful endeavour is to complete a comparative analysis between
different companies at a similar stage of development. Both quantitative and
qualitative criteria need to be considered.
Comparing P/E ratios between producers is useful. For developers consider
the debt and payback period of the mining operation and consider the value
of the proven & probable reserves against market capitalization. Explorers
only have the quality and quantity of their deposits available for comparison.
A mining operation with a shorter payback period is obviously preferable to
one with a longer one. A larger deposit is superior to a smaller one. But how
does a mining operation with a small deposit and short payback compare to one
with a large deposit and longer payback period?
Well, that is like comparing apples to oranges and I suppose it depends on
whether you prefer the apple to the orange.
|