|
There has been a raging debate on Silicon Investor, the Motley Fool, Minyanville,
and nearly everywhere else too about whether or not it is possible for a Japanese
style deflation to happen in the United States. Almost everyone denies the
possibility outright.
Because most people writing about or discussing this issue do not have a background
in economics (myself included), I asked Paul Kasriel Sr. V.P. and Director
of Economic Research at The Northern Trust Company for his thoughts on deflation
in Japan vs. deflation in the US. We also had a brief follow up phone conversation
after I received his email response. What follows is an email from Kasriel
as well as a synopsis of our phone interview. These conversations took place
on December 7th and 8th 2006 with one followup question over the weekend.
No, this is NOT a spoof as was An
email from Bernanke.
This is the real deal.
Email from Paul Kasriel
Japan experienced a deflation in recent years because the bursting of its
asset-price bubble in the early 1990s created huge losses in its banking
system. The Japanese banks had financed the asset-price bubble. When it burst,
the debtors could not keep current on their loans to the banks and therefore
were forced to turn back the collateral to the banks. The market value of
the collateral, of course, was less than the amount of the loans outstanding,
thereby inflicting huge losses of capital to the Japanese banks. With the
decline in bank capital, the Japanese banks could not extend new credit to
the private sector even though the Bank of Japan was offering credit to the
banks at very low nominal rates of interest.
Banks are an important transmission mechanism between the central bank and
the private economy. If the banks are unable or unwilling to extend the cheap
credit being offered to them by the central bank, then the economy grows
very slowly, if at all. This happened in the U.S. during the early 1930s.
U.S. banks currently hold record amounts of mortgage-related assets on their
books. If the housing market were to go into a deep recession resulting in
massive mortgage defaults, the U.S. banking system could sustain huge losses
similar to what the Japanese banks experienced in the 1990s. If this were
to occur, the Fed could cut interest rates to zero but it would have little
positive effect on economic activity or inflation.
Short of the Fed depositing newly-created money directly into private sector
accounts, I suspect that a deflation would occur under these circumstances.
Again, crippled banking systems tend to bring on deflations. And crippled
banking systems seem to result from the bursting of asset bubbles because
of the sharp decline in the value of the collateral backing bank loans.
Hope this helps,
Paul
Paul L. Kasriel
Sr. V.P. and Director of Economic Research
The Northern Trust Company
50 South LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60603
Followup Interview
I was fortunate to catch Paul for a brief phone interview after I received
that email. Here it is.
Mish: Would you say that consumer debt in the US as opposed to the
lack of consumer debt in Japan increases the deflationary pressures on the
US economy?
Kasriel: Yes, absolutely. The latest figures that I have show that
banks' exposure to the mortgage market is at 62% of their total earnings assets,
an all time high. If a prolonged housing bust ensues, banks could be in big
trouble.
Mish: What if Bernanke cuts interest rates to 1 percent?
Kasriel: In a sustained housing bust that causes banks to take a big
hit to their capital it simply will not matter. This is essentially what happened
recently in Japan and also in the US during the great depression.
Mish: Can you elaborate?
Kasriel: Most people are not aware of actions the Fed took during the
great depression. Bernanke claims that the Fed did not act strong enough during
the great depression. This is simply not true. The Fed slashed interest rates
and injected huge sums of base money but it did no good. More recently, Japan
did the same thing. It also did no good. If default rates get high enough,
banks will simply be unwilling to lend which will severely limit money and
credit creation.
Mish: Do you have any comments regarding Greenspan?
Kasriel: Greenspan is a fascinating study. Some day I hope to write
a book about him. Right now I willing to say he is the luckiest Fed chairman
in history.
Mish: Greenspan is the luckiest Fed chair in history? How so?
Kasriel: He was fortunate in two very big ways. First off, he was fortunate
to preside over the economy at a time when productivity was soaring and the
global supply of goods was expanding rapidly because China had entered the
world trading arena. In that environment the Fed could create large amounts
of money and credit without causing inflation other than in asset prices.
Mish: Does that mean you believe that inflation is a monetary phenomenon
related to increases in money supply and credit as opposed to rising prices?
Kasriel: Yes, and that is exactly why Greenspan was so lucky. Inflation
was masked by the factors we just mentioned.
Mish: I am very glad you said the word "masked". I have used that word
for quite some time but most just do not get it. What is the second way Greenspan
was fortunate?
Kasriel: When the Fed slashed interest rates to 1%, the U.S. banking
system was capitalized well enough to be willing and able to relend the cheap
credit it was being offered by the Fed. This stimulated housing. Housing provided
jobs. With jobs and with rising real estate prices people felt confident to
borrow and banks felt comfortable to lend.
Mish: How does inflation start and end?
Kasriel: Inflation starts with expansion of money and credit. Inflation
ends when the central bank is no longer able or willing to extend credit and/or
when consumers and businesses are no longer willing to borrow because further
expansion and /or speculation no longer makes any economic sense.
Mish: So when does it all end?
Kasriel: That is extremely difficult to project. If the current housing
recession were to turn into a housing depression, leading to massive mortgage
defaults, it could end. Alternatively, if there were a run on the dollar in
the foreign exchange market, price inflation could spike up and the Fed would
have no choice but to raise interest rates aggressively. Given the record leverage
in the U.S. economy, the rise in interest rates would prompt large scale bankruptcies.
These are the two "checkmate" scenarios that come to mind.
Mish: Thanks Paul. When you do your book on "The Luckiest Fed Chairman
in History" please send me a copy. I am sure it will be a best seller.
Kasriel: Will do.
Well I hope that puts to bed two ideas
- That it is impossible or nearly impossible for the US to suffer Japanese
style deflation
- That slashing interest rates to 1% will matter one iota if it happens.
It should also put to bed (but probably won't) the distinction between inflation
(a monetary event) and prices.
|