|
Back in December of 2001, Robert Arnott and Clifford Asness published an interesting
paper entitled "Does Dividend Policy Foretell Earnings Growth?". Arnott and
Asness used more than 100 years of data in an effort to determine the relationship,
if any, between the overall payout ratio (the proportion of earnings paid-out
to shareholders in the form of dividends) of the companies that comprise the
S&P500 Index and the rate of earnings growth for this group of companies
over the ensuing 10 years. In particular, the authors wanted to test the popular
view that when companies retain more of their current earnings, that is, when
companies pay-out a smaller proportion of current earnings as dividends to
shareholders, the rate of future earnings growth will be relatively high because
the companies will have more money to invest in new opportunities.
What they discovered was that the empirical evidence revealed a strong correlation
between the payout ratio and the subsequent earnings growth, but, ironically,
the correlation was the exact OPPOSITE of what most people were presuming it
to be at the time. Specifically, whereas most people were under the impression
that there was an inverse correlation between payout ratio and earnings growth,
with a high payout ratio today leading to slower earnings growth in the future
and a low payout ratio today leading to faster earnings growth in the future,
the data showed that a strong POSITIVE correlation actually existed. In other
words, the data clearly indicated that when corporations pay-out a relatively
low proportion of their current earnings as dividends their earnings growth
over the ensuing 10 years tends to be relatively SLOW, and that high pay-out
ratios tend to be followed by 10-year periods of relatively FAST earnings growth.
Arnott and Asness posited some reasons for the above-described correlation.
For example, they said that the willingness of company managements to pay-out
relatively high proportions of current earnings could be indicative of the
managers' confidence in the abilities of their corporations to generate higher
earnings in the future; and that greater-than-average payout ratios might lead
to the making of better investment decisions -- and, therefore, higher future
earnings growth -- by forcing managements to be more discerning when formulating
expansion plans. However, A&A's main interest was the existence of such
a reliable relationship. The reasons for the relationship were/are open to
debate, but the relationship itself was/is an empirical fact.
We've included, below, Exhibits 1 and 3 from the aforementioned Arnott/Asness
paper. Both exhibits cover the period from 1950 through to 2001.
Exhibit 1 is a chart of the S&P500's payout ratio and shows that the proportion
of earnings paid out as dividends oscillated between a low of around 29% and
a high of around 78% over the period in question. Exhibit 3 shows, in table
form, how the compound annual rate of real (CPI-adjusted) earnings growth achieved
over a 10-year period was linked to the payout ratio at the beginning of the
period. For example, it tells us that when the payout ratio was in the lowest
quartile then the maximum real annual earnings growth achieved over the ensuing
10 years was +2.6%, the minimum was -3.4%, and the average was -0.7%.


Let's now take a look at the current situation.
According to Barrons magazine, the S&P500 presently has a P/E ratio of
17.94 and a dividend yield (dividend to price, or D/P, ratio) of 1.82%. The
payout ratio (dividends divided by earnings, or D/E) is equal to the P/E ratio
multiplied by the dividend yield (D/E = P/E x D/P), so the S&P500's current
payout ratio is about 33%. This means that the current payout ratio is in the
bottom quartile, which, in turn, implies that the annual CPI-adjusted earnings
growth rate over the next 10 years will be somewhere between -3.4% and +2.6%.
In other words, today's low dividend payout ratio suggests that the S&P500's
real earnings are going to either grow at a very slow rate or SHRINK over the
coming 10 years.
We don't see any reason why the relationship described by A&A that has
worked for more than 100 years is about to stop working, so we think it's reasonable
to expect the rate of real earnings growth to be sub-par over the coming decade.
This doesn't, however, mean that the S&P500 Index will fall over the coming
year or that it will necessarily perform poorly in nominal dollar terms over
the next 10 years.
What it does mean is that over the coming 5-10 years the S&P500 Index
is very likely to maintain its downward trend relative to gold and stock market
valuations (P/E ratios, etc.) are very likely to contract. It also means that
the risk of a large decline in nominal dollar terms occurring at some point
over the coming 12 months is much higher than it would normally be due to the
potential for the optimistic earnings-growth expectations currently factored
into stock prices to come face-to-face with reality.
|