|
Below is an extract from a commentary originally posted at www.speculative-investor.com on
10th January 2007.
The combination of massive inflation and factors that help suppress some of
the 'bad' effects of inflation* has allowed imbalances to become much greater
than would otherwise have been possible. It has also created the illusion that
the rules of the game have changed.
The analysis done by research firm GaveKal provides us with a good example
of an illusion created by rampant inflation. Over the past two years the GaveKal
team has published a book ("Our Brave New World") and many articles in which
the argument has been made that it is different this time; and that one of
the main reasons it is different is due to a larger percentage of the US economy
becoming "knowledge-based". In particular, a bullish structural change often
cited by GaveKal is the rise to prominence of "platform companies": companies
such as Dell Computer that outsource the low-margin capital-intensive parts
of the business -- manufacturing, for instance -- to countries where labour
costs are extremely low, and keep the high-value-added/high-margin parts of
the business such as marketing and R&D.
According to GaveKal, the long-term shift from a manufacturing-based economy
to a "knowledge-based" economy is largely responsible for US corporate profits
becoming abnormally high as a percentage of GDP and is why we shouldn't expect
the after-tax cash flow generated by corporate America, as a percentage of
GDP, to revert to its long-term mean. Dr John Hussman exposes some of the flaws
in the GaveKal argument in his commentary at http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc061226.htm,
but we think there's a bigger issue not covered in Hussman's rebuttal.
The bigger issue is that GaveKal et al make the mistake of treating money
as if it were neutral and attempting to explain economic/financial trends by
looking only at business developments. The thing is, what central banks and
governments have done and continue to do to their currencies is at the core
of today's major trends and deviations from long-term averages.
As a result of what continues to transpire on the monetary front it is often
only possible to see what's REALLY happening via ratio charts that remove from
the picture the general rise in nominal prices caused by currency depreciation.
For example, the good nominal performance of the US stock market over recent
years in the face of much higher-than-average valuation levels would seem to
support GaveKal's theories, but the first of the following charts clearly shows
that the stock market of the "knowledge-based" US economy is in a secular BEAR
market relative to the stock market of the resource-based Canadian economy.
Furthermore, as evidenced by the second of the following charts the Canadian
stock market is, itself, immersed in a secular bear market in hard money (gold)
terms.


The bottom line is that when we take a long-term view of relative price performance
we can see the footprints of an inflation problem exactly where we should be
seeing them. The rules of the game haven't changed; all that's changed is the
money in which prices are denominated. Specifically, money has been losing
value at an accelerated pace and it's been doing so in a deceptive way.
*Over the past 10 years a number of factors have come together to make
it possible for central banks to promote more growth in the total supply
of money and credit with less adverse effects than ever before, by far the
most important factor being the large out-flow of dollars on the US current
account and the re-cycling of these dollars into the bond market. Currently,
dollars flow out of the US at the rate of around $700B/year in exchange for
low-cost goods, thus helping to keep downward pressure on the prices of those
things included in the US CPI calculation. A large chunk of this dollar out-flow
is then absorbed by price-insensitive buyers -- central banks that are driven
by concerns other than obtaining a good real return on investment -- and
sent back to the US in exchange for debt securities, thus helping to keep
downward pressure on interest rates.
|