|
Moody's is reporting Bonds
Safest in at Least 4 Years, Credit Swaps Show.
By Shannon D. Harrington
The risk of owning corporate debt is the lowest in at least four years after
housing data bolstered confidence that the worst of the residential real
estate slump is over, according to traders who bet on corporate creditworthiness
in the credit-default swap market.
"There's some optimism that credit quality will continue to remain strong
and default rates will remain low," said Ira Jersey, a strategist at Credit
Suisse in New York. "Homebuilders did pretty well because of housing starts
and permit numbers. Certainly, with the jobless claims being low, people
will have money to spend."
Credit-default swaps on homebuilders fell to the lowest in more than eight
months as housing data lifted confidence that home sales are rebounding from
last year's 18 percent drop, the worst plunge since 1990. A decline in the
price of credit-default swap suggests improving perceptions of credit quality.
Contracts on $10 million in bonds of D.R. Horton Inc., the biggest U.S.
homebuilder, fell to $65,100 from $73,000 Jan 12, CMA Datavision prices show.
The price is the lowest since May.
"A lot of people are calling for the bottom of the market, and by mid-2007
we should see some sort of recovery," said CreditSights Inc. analyst Sarah
Rowin in New York. "Although earnings are going to be down, the builders
could come off relatively intact."
CDO Sales
The derivatives helped CDO sales surge last year to a record $497.1 billion,
81 percent more than in 2005, Morgan Stanley analysts said this month. The
funds, which are sliced up according to risk and sold as bonds, appeal to
investors because they can offer higher yields than the assets being pooled.
Credit-default swaps, which were conceived to protect bondholders against
default and pay the buyer face value in exchange for the securities if a
company does default, have become one of the best gauges of shifts in credit
quality.
An estimated $26 trillion in the contracts are outstanding, the International
Swaps and Derivatives Association said in September. Derivatives are financial
instruments derived from stocks, bonds, loans, currencies and commodities,
or linked to specific events like changes in the weather or interest rates.
Let's see if we can take this apart piece by piece.
Shannon Harrington: "The risk of owning corporate debt is the lowest in at
least four years."
Mish: No the "risk" is not the lowest. Yield spreads have compressed because
the willingness to take on risk is at its highest point in at least four years.
Spreads between junk and investment grade debt have collapsed. Do not confuse
optimism with risk. An inverted yield curve suggests this optimism is not warranted,
nor is the bounce in housing starts that significant. This all reminds me of
the continued optimism in JDSU and CIEN in the Nazcrash of 2001 before they
eventually lost over 90% of their value.
Ira Jersey: "There's some optimism that credit quality will continue to remain
strong and default rates will remain low. Certainly, with the jobless claims
being low, people will have money to spend."
Mish: Well you certainly have that optimism part right but you are confusing
jobless claims with money to spend. A negative savings rate for 18 consecutive
months suggests that consumers are spending money they do not have. Also note
that we are continuing to lose high paying manufacturing jobs for low paying
jobs at Walmart and Pizza hut. Also note that Mortgage Equity Withdrawal (MEW)
is drying up as a source of funding. That is less money in pockets to spend.
Finally, even IF consumers had more money to spend, at some point they will
stop spending it. Debt burdens are at an all time high. That debt must be paid
off. For spending to dramatically rise, both jobs and wages (not just for the
fat cats) have to rise. That is not happening as global wage arbitrage and
outsourcing continues unabated.
Shannon Harrington: "A decline in the price of credit-default swap suggests
improving perceptions of credit quality."
Mish: Exactly. Please do not confuse perceptions with reality. Do not confuse
perceptions with risk either.
Sarah Rowin: "A lot of people are calling for the bottom of the market, and
by mid-2007 we should see some sort of recovery. Although earnings are going
to be down, the builders could come off relatively intact."
Mish: Does bottom calling mean it will happen or does it represent unwarranted
optimism? How many bottom calls were there when the Naz started plunging from
the peak over 5000? Has anyone bothered to look at cash and inventory levels
on homebuilders? Sarah, please take a look at homebuilder corporate statements.
They are running out of both cash and profits, while inventories are soaring.
Morgan Stanley: CDO sales surged last year to a record $497.1 billion, 81
percent more than in 2005. The funds, which are sliced up according to risk
and sold as bonds, appeal to investors because they can offer higher yields
than the assets being pooled.
Mish: We will take a look at the "appeal" of higher yields in a chart below.
International Swaps: An estimated $26 trillion in the contracts are outstanding,
the International Swaps and Derivatives Association said in September.
Mish: Wow. On the theory that "the bigger the bet the safer things must be" this
must be a sure sign that "Corporate Bonds Are Safe".
Let's take a look at a chart of Moody's Baa Corporate Bonds to see what it
might be saying.
Moody's Baa Bonds

Above chart by sharelynx.com.
Moody's
Baa Bonds
Baa - Bonds and preferred stock which are rated Baa are considered as medium-grade
obligations (i.e., they are neither highly protected nor poorly secured).
Interest payments and principal security appear adequate for the present
but certain protective elements may be lacking or may be characteristically
unreliable over any great length of time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment
characteristics and in fact have speculative characteristics as well.
Baa bonds are just one step above junk. Yields are close to 6%.
Bank Deals - Best Rates shows
that you can get up 6.19% for 6 months at some places. Hmmm. Lets see, do you
want 6.19% on a 100% guaranteed bet or approximately the same thing on bonds
rated one step above junk? Inquiring minds want to know what if anything is "appealing" about
the risk/reward shown in that chart.
On that thought the Mish telepathic question lines are open. Hmmm. I am being
flooded with calls. Fortunately the ideas expressed are all similar. They go
something like this. "Mish, you are trashing corporate bonds at a mere 6% or
so but if I recall correctly you like 10 year treasuries that yield even less.
Please explain"
10 Year Treasuries

Above chart by sharelynx.com, modified
by Mish.
Some newcomers might be confused about the seasons on the above chart. Those
seasons correspond to something called the K-Cycle. K-Cycles are long. The
last K-cycle Autumn peak was in 1929. That was followed by the great depression.
With companies going bankrupt in the early 1930's the last place you wanted
to be was in corporate bonds. Those in treasuries did great. Safety vs. "perceived
safety" is the key. Although I am not calling for another depression, I am
merely pointing out that the economic conditions are very similar. This case
was presented in 1929
Revisited.
Interest Rate Interpretation of the K-Cycle

K-Cycle longer term view

If we are headed into "winter" the last place you want to be is in junk bonds.
Even if we are not headed into "winter" where is the risk/reward for junk bonds
when you can get nearly the same yields in CDs?
No matter how you slice it, credit swaps have pushed corporate yield spreads
far into the blatantly complacent level where risk is enormous and rewards
are slim. That is exactly the opposite of what Shannon Harrington is suggesting.
|