|
When the most esteemed market strategists espouse questionable economic theories,
they should not be able to do so without being exposed to critique. Recently,
two revered men of finance, Bill Gross and John Rutledge, made some pretty
extraordinary comments, remarks which haven't gotten the attention they deserve.
Let's Make Nothing!
On the Fox business block airing Saturday January 6th, Dr. John Rutledge of
Rutledge Capital stated that America would be better off if we manufactured nothing and
imported 100% of our goods from abroad. This is one of the most egregious arguments
an economist can make. Having an economy where manufacturing is zero percent
of G.D.P. (Currently manufacturing is less than 14% of America's G.D.P.) guarantees
two pernicious outcomes. First, our already huge trade deficit would explode,
putting greater pressure on the U.S. dollar as we send yet more of our country's
wealth into foreign hands. Next, our very sovereignty would be in greater jeopardy
as we would find ourselves at the mercy of erstwhile exporting countries; if
they one day turned hostile, they could shut off our access to the tangible
goods that are necessary for running our national defense and economy.
Imagine if you and your neighbor entered into a trade agreement in which he
agreed to supply all your tangible goods and in return you agreed to send him
pieces of paper with numbers on them (dollars) that were only redeemable within
your domicile. This would be a grand deal for you as your neighbor toils, producing
things of real value while you effortlessly print currency without backing
or intrinsic worth. Your neighbor uses the dollars you send him to purchase
pieces of your home and contents thereof. Everything appears fine until eventually
your neighbor accumulates a concentrated position in your assets and/or you
no longer maintain ownership of your possessions. Your neighbor then decides
to consume more of his manufactured goods inside his increasingly wealthy household
and sell his dollar denominate holdings of your home to the highest bidder.
The problem is the market is already saturated with your currency and the value
of your pieces of paper and assets plunge.
Our trade deficit will one day be subject to these same machinations. Our
fiat currency system allows for the process to be protracted over many years,
allowing some economists and politicians to blissfully proclaim that deficits
don't matter. If the U.S dollar was backed by gold reserves the trade deficit
would be a self-correcting process, one which would not allow for such imbalances
nor the unnaturally low interest rates we see today.
Interest Rates and Growth
In addition to Mr. Rutledge's interesting comment, the eminent Bill Gross
of PIMCO told a reporter from Bloomberg during a January 5th interview about
the Fed's next interest rate decision that, "Slower economic growth, certainly
slower nominal growth, ultimately forces the Fed to lower [rates]." He continued,
saying that the Fed funds rate may be cut to "below the nominal growth rate
in order to re-stimulate productive growth in the economy." It appears that
Mr. Gross (a bond guru) is of the opinion that it is the Fed's responsibility
to artificially inflate the value of assets. Not true.
Interest rates (which represent the cost of money) should be governed by the
supply vs. demand for cash. Excess savings should produce lower interest rates,
excess consumption higher ones. And the total cash available should be restricted
by the supply of gold and silver, the way the cost of money is determined in
a free market economy. Why do we trust a group of twelve people who meet in
secret to decide the appropriate level of interest rates and growth in our
economy?
But the worst distortion of economic tenets -- which Mr. Gross is not alone
in violating -- is the belief that increasing the supply of money engenders productivity growth.
Increasing the supply of money may in the short term mislead producers to
meet the increased demand for their products with increased production. However,
the producers quickly realize that the increasing demand emanates from a flood
of new money entering the system and there is no concomitant output of labor
or effort behind consumers' newly acquired fiat money. The producers then realize
they have no need to increase the output of their goods because they know the
consumers will readily part with their new money as it does not represent the
result of their labor. Consumers don't demand pricing power and producers can
garner the same revenue by increasing prices as they would by increasing production.
The result is inflation.
The only thing the Fed can create is inflation, as evidenced by the destruction
of the purchasing power of the U.S.D. since the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
Economic growth and productivity have their roots in low taxes, low inflation
and low interest rates, along with an unfettered and well educated populace.
Artificially lowering rates today will only continue to undermine our currency
and our economy.
Few economists are willing to espouse the truth behind what the Fed and Politicians
are doing to our country. If we are losing the stewardship of John Rutledge
and Bill Gross, we are all in trouble indeed.
**We have gained the exclusive right to bring you a special report on the
recent Canadian royalty trust tax announcement from Roger Conrad, one of the
leading commentators on this industry. His report contains a discussion of
many individual energy trusts and can be downloaded here: http://www.deltaga.com/reportForm.asp?rep=4.
|