Dear Subscribers,
As is described in the title of this commentary, the market remains "overbought" although
the "uptrend remains intact." This has been the theme for at least a couple
of months now - and has been a great lesson for folks who have been consistently
calling a market top and had continued shorting into each new high. As of Sunday
afternoon on January 21, 2007, this theme remains in place, although the market
has definitely gotten less overbought (in the short-term) over the last couple
of weeks or so. While there definitely are some danger signs, I do not believe
the market is making an imminent top (although subscribers should remember
that February is a seasonally weak month) just yet.
Before we continue with your commentary, let us do an update on the two most
recent signals in our DJIA Timing System:
1st signal entered: 50% long position on September 7th at 11,385, giving us
a gain of 1,180.53 points
2nd signal entered: Additional 50% long position on September 25th at 11,505
giving us a gain of 1,060.53 points
Some of our readers have specifically asked when we would exit our long positions
in our DJIA Timing System - given the "profits" that we have made over the
last four months or so. My answer: The U.S. stock market remains in a cyclical
bull market, and until we see signs of a significant top, we are not scaling
back just yet. Whether we will just scale back to a 50% long position or go
short - this will depend on my future convictions. For now, those convictions
are firmly in place for a continued run in this bull market. If, however, the
Dow Industrials rallies 500 points within the next week or so (on weak breadth
or weak volume), then we will scale back our long position to a 50% long position
in our DJIA Timing System. Readers please stay tuned.
As of Sunday afternoon on January 21, 2007, we are still fully (100%) long
in our DJIA Timing System and is still long-term bullish on the U.S. domestic, "brand
name" large caps - names such as Wal-Mart (which is now making a serious effort
in the Chinese market by acquiring
Taiwanese-owned Trust-Mart and naming a more aggressive
new head of operations in China), Home Depot (which is now also expanding
in China), Microsoft (I expect Vista to rake in the cash over the next
couple of years), IBM, eBay, Intel, GE, and American Express. We are also bullish
on Yahoo, Amazon, and most other retailers as this author believes that "the
death of the U.S. consumer" has been way overblown. We also believe that the
combination of Microsoft Vista, Office, commercialization of the solid
state hard drive, and commercialization of solar energy will be a boon
to semiconductor companies, such as SanDisk, Samsung, and Applied Materials.
Moreover - judging by what we saw at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas
a couple of weeks ago, there is a good chance we are now seeing a revival of Sony
as a great global corporation (barring a global economic recession, the
rest of this and the next decade will be known as the age of the emerging market
consumer). We also continued to be very bullish on good-quality and growth
stocks in general.
In the short-run, the major stock market indices still look strong, although
readers who are long individual stocks will definitely need to watch out given
that earnings reporting season is now ramping up (many individual stocks -
even Apple and IBM - can get hit even should the market indices continue to
rally). We are now probably at a stage where breadth in the stock market is
narrowing - with the major indices being supported by a decreasing number of
stocks as time goes on (such as during the April 1998 to January 2000 period).
I believe those stocks will be the blue chip, large caps such as what I had
mentioned about - such as Home Depot, Wal-Mart, Microsoft, GE, etc. As for
the global stock market rally we have been witnessing over the last few years,
I also believe that rally will narrow going forward - with the U.S. stock market
being the stand-out. I also believe that energy has made a good short-term
bottom, and that while energy should continue to struggle this year, the secular
energy bull should remain intact - as long as there is no significant breakthrough
in battery or solar energy in the next few years.
Let us begin our "market overbought but uptrend remains intact" commentary
by reviewing the most recent action of the Dow Industrials vs. its Advance-Decline
line. As subscribers may know, the A/D line has historically been a very
reliable precursor of a significant top, although there have also been times
when the A/D line and the actual index it represents topped out at the same
time (although such instances are relatively rare). However, there have also
been times when the A/D line is too early in calling a top, such as the topping
out of the NYSE A/D line in April 1998 - nearly a whole two years before a
corresponding top in the major indices such as the DJIA, the NASDAQ Composite,
and the S&P 500.
Without further ado, following is a three-year chart of the Dow Jones Industrial
Average vs. the A/D line of the DJIA, courtesy of Decisionpoint.com:

As discussed in the above chart, the Dow Industrials A/D line is still making
all-time highs as we speak - suggesting that the Dow Industrials Average is
still nowhere close to making an all-time high. Over the last few years, a
significant top in the Dow Industrials has usually been preceded by the topping
out of the DJIA A/D line by at least a couple of months. Should the DJIA A/D
line top out next week, this would probably mean a continuation of the rally
of the Dow Industrials to at least mid to late March (for an earlier reference,
the top of the Dow Industrials in January 2000 was preceded by a top in the
DJIA A/D line in May 1999 - a lead time of eight months!). Readers please stay
tuned.
The second item on the list is relative valuations - a theme which I have
been harping on for the last five to six months, including in our September
28, 2006 commentary and our November
26, 2006 commentary. As I stated in that commentary (and in previous commentaries),
we have been utilizing the Barnes Index (please see our March
30, 2006 commentary for a description) as a measure of relative valuation
between the two most important asset classes with money managers and investors
today - that of equities and bonds. Following is the chart courtesy of Decisionpoint.com plotting
the weekly values of the Barnes Index vs. the NYSE Composite from January 1970
to the present:

The Barnes Index got as high as 67.60 in early May 2006, as we discussed in
our May 7, 2006 commentary ("Playing
the Probabilities"). At the time, I stated: "In our past commentaries,
I discussed that we will not enter the "dangerous zone" (the zone when cash/bonds
start to become attractive relative to equities) until we hit the 65 to 70
level on the Barnes Index. As of last Friday at the close, the Barnes Index
finally entered the "dangerous zone" when it registered a reading of 67.60 … Of
course, a huge decline isn't imminent here - especially given the fact that
the market has gone on to make higher highs until the Barnes Index touch the
90 level (or even higher such as August 1987, April 1998, and January 2000)
in 1981, 1983 and 1990. But today's reading of 67.60 is consistent with the
level made in the 1973 top, as well as the January 1980 top (which occurred
in conjunction with the top in gold and silver prices). One should at least
expect a significant correction here - especially given the continuing rise
in long bond yields and the fact that Fed still has at least one more Fed Funds
rate hike to go on May 10th."
In retrospect, we did manage to get our "significant correction" - and the
Barnes Index has been instrumental in calling that. As of last Friday at the
close, however, the Barnes Index closed at 61.60 - still too far on the low
side to be calling a significant top just yet. Moreover, as a cyclical bull
market matures, valuations have typically continued to rise - typically surprising
everyone as it continues to rise, even the most bullish of traders. Because
of this, I would not be calling a top - even a short-term one - until the Barnes
Index has reached a higher level than what we witnessed on May 7, 2006. Instead
of the 65 to 70 "dangerous zone" that we discussed earlier last year, I am
now revising this "dangerous zone" to 70 to 75. As for the ultimate top in
this cyclical bull market, I would not be surprised if the Barnes Index rises
to the 100 level (or over) before we see the death of this current bull market.
The third and final item (for this weekend's commentary anyway) reinforcing
the view that the cyclical bull market isn't over yet is the NYSE Short Interest
Ratio. Without further ado, following is a weekly chart showing the NYSE Short
Interest Ratio vs. the Dow Industrials from January 1994 to the present:

Note that since this cyclical bull market began in October 2002, a spike in
the NYSE short interest ratio has always led to a subsequent rally in the stock
market. This was true as recently as September 2006 - when the NYSE short interest
ratio hit 7.0 - a level not seen since July 1998. As mentioned above, the latest
ratio of 6.8 is now at a high not seen since September 2006, and prior to that,
July 1998. Given the high short interest ratio, chances are that the market
will continue its rally going forward - and the Dow Industrials should make
a new all-time high over the next few weeks.
More follows for subscribers...