|
An
interesting contest is currently taking place across the global financial sphere.
It is a discussion worth tuning in to, for both investors and financial practioners.
After all, both are dependent upon the same phenomena, even though the shares
of the pie may shift periodically.
On one side, a number of respected financial analysts are staggered by the
continuing financialization boom, the widening international savings imbalances
and apparent lackadaisical complacency. Such respected luminaries as Larry
Summers, Joseph Stiglitz and notable others have been sounding alarums -- whether
for shorter or longer periods. In their view, the price of risk has blown sky
high, equating the investment heroics of today's investors and hedge funds
to "picking up pennies in front of a steamroller." Present trends are
unsustainable and unprecedented, they claim.
On the other side is a greater majority who thinks that the good times and
mega-bonuses for investment bankers and other financial croupiers will roll
on for yet quite a while. Apparently, to this group, nothing on the horizon
portends any change to present warp speeds. Given the world's rapidly globalizing
workforce and the enormous inventiveness of the globe's financial industry
-- which also is the biggest profit earner in the world -- that kind of optimism,
of course, is inclined to find a heavy constituency. Amongst this group, sustainability
is a question for the next year, not 2007.
Who's right? Maybe both groups. The key will be timing. As this year opens,
clearly, the irrepressible weight of money and burgeoning financial asset and
paper generation worldwide is cowing the naysayers. Even "causal-thinking"
theorists no longer risk venturing any sobering forecasts. One by one, they
have lost their courage.
Yet, there is a paradoxical thing: The broad consensus does agree that there
are indeed a number of unsustainable trends at play -- in fact, even very reckless
developments. So what's the key difference? One group looks at remarkable developments
of the past five years and concludes that the momentum of the financial steamroller
is just too impressive to counter. The other group simply gapes in awe that
such sojourns into uncharted waters, could continue yet one year longer.
Time will tell who is right. For the sake of illustration, let's concede for
now the case being argued by the majority -- that the global financialization
boom can continue unmolested for one more year. In fact, we'll go a few better.
Just what would have to happen over the next 5 years to continue the remarkable
developments of the last five? Could the unparalleled financial boom last another
5 years?
Let's briefly review just 5 of the unprecedented developments of the last
5 years -- end-2001 to end-2006. We will simply assume that "tomorrow will
be as yesterday."

1. Five More Rungs Up on the Financial Ladder. Firstly, a reference
point that is near and dear to all. The 1st chart on the front page shows the
extent of the rise in financial asset value around the world. According to McKinsey
Global Institute, global financial assets have risen from USD $91 trillion
at end-2001 to $140 trillion at end-2005. Roughly updating this number to end-2006,
would now place this figure above $150 trillion. In short, over the past 5
years, financial assets have grown approximately by $60 trillion. That's a
rise of +65%, or equivalent to the value of over 150% of global GDP annually.
Indeed this development was remarkable. But can it continue at this pace of
expansion for 5 years more?
Assuming 5% nominal growth in world economic output per annum and the same
rate of expansion in financial intensity (plus other assumptions), the
world would produce roughly another $120 trillion worth. Such a boost in financial
assets would represent 10 times the entire value of assets that existed in
1980. Is it possible?
2. Sources of High Propensity to Consume. It goes without saying that
the last 5 years have witnessed a bipolar world with respect to savings and
net cross-border capital flows. Consider the shift between just two sets of
the world's players -- its leading economy and some still mostly developing
ones, namely Asia and the oil exporting nations. The 2nd chart on the front
page shows the significance of this shift over recent years. The correlated
offset is the US current account deficit. The earlier referenced McKinsey report
estimates that the US absorbed 85% of global capital flows in 2005.
Looking ahead 5 years, let's make just one supposition, and that with respect
to China. Were this country's trade surplus (up 8x since 2001) and currency
reserves to grow at the same pace as the last 5 years, we must expect its reserves
to blow through $2 trillion and its trade surplus to almost equal the size
of the entire US trade deficit today. Can it happen? Maybe, but relative demand
for the US dollar can be expected to change quite substantially.
3. Anglo Savings Adjustments. The USCD reported this past week that
the US household saving rate for all of 2006 was 1%, the worst in 73 years.
It was old news. To be sure, this is a heavily embattled statistic. Assuming
that the deterioration of this savings rate (gross or net, pre- or post-taxes,
take your pick) continues apace in Canada and the US, in 5 years the deficit
will be plumbing near -5%. In the meantime, the US wealth skew has been widening,
too. So if that trend were to continue also, (as it must), we should expect
that the median household will have a savings deficit of near 10% and the Gini
coefficient of all North America slipping to levels below most of South America
and Mexico. A January 2007 report from the Center for American Progress concludes "that
all the gains made in financial security among middle class families in the
1990s had disappeared by the early this century."
4. Fuel for Speculative Investment Leverage. The
"carry trade" is again the topic of the month, and not surprisingly. Cheap "low-yield" money
remains on tap in the world, fostering leverage and marked effects on currency
trends. The biggest source of monetary effluvia of course has been Japan. Other
currencies are also involved as finance currencies -- the Swiss franc and others.
All is well, as long as Japan et al continues to maintain low interest rates
and can tolerate stimulating its exports without any inflation flare-ups. One
more assumption is necessary for this to continue -- that the yen will be allowed
to fall indefinitely.
According to the estimates of Tim Lee of Pi Economics (Source: RGE
Monitor) about $1 trillion of private money (not including the actions
of the official sector) is involved in the carry trade and is betting
that the yen will continue to weaken further. In real terms, the yen has
already fallen lower than prior to the last liquidity spike in the yen which
occurred back in 1998 (the very nadir of the Asian Crisis). For this
source of cheap funds to continue plying speculative investors for the next
5 years, what must we expect? Our back-of-the envelope estimates: A total
yencarry trade of near $2 trillion and a yen at 200 to the USD (adj. real
terms). Manufacturers in North America and Europe (even China)
will be screaming. Actually, the Europeans are bringing up this very issue
at the upcoming G7 this month in Essen.
5. The Silent OTC Colossus. Over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives growth
in recent years is the stuff of fairy tales. At last count, the Bank of International
Settlements (BIS) estimates a total nominal value for these instruments of
$369.9 trillion. That's up $72.2 trillion in just 6 months to June 30, 2006.
Over the period 2001 to end-2006, its likely that this lucrative financial
sector will have expanded in nominal value by over $325 trillion, a near quadruple
(equivalent to 7x annual world GDP today). Another 5 years at the same
rate? $1,700 trillion.
Conclusions. We have briefly reviewed just 5 "New Millennia" developments.
Can they all together continue apace for another 5 years? Then how about just
one more year? Of course, a lot more is riding on that last answer than may
be thought for at least two reasons -- the effects of asymmetry and exponential
momentum.
The "five factors for five more years" we have reviewed must continue
their expansion apace just to keep the rock from falling upon Sisyphus. A condition
of acceleration is required just to maintain the status quo.
Will everything continue as before for one more year? The strongest consensus
on Wall Street in a long time right now says yes. Will domestic and global
equity markets achieve 10% to 20% returns this year as in 2006? Maybe so. The
most important factor, however, is risk. If anything, right now, we are cowed
by the high risks ... not the "high-5" Wall Street cheerleaders.
|