|
The ECB met this week, confirming the expectations of the majority of economists
predicting that the bankers will leave rates unchanged at 3.5%. In the coming
months, however, ECB has signalled tightening and rates are expected to head
to 4.0%.
According to the conventional wisdom of 2006, this will push the euro higher,
possibly as high as 1.45 against the dollar, as forecasted by a number of leading
foreign exchange banks in January 2007.
Humans are prone to believing Myths without questioning the underlying reality
of the situation at hand. As you well know, we take commonly held Myths (ranging
from the 9/11 story to the Fed, to the War on Terror and conspiracy theories)
to task.
For example, before the War in Iraq began the public was divided over whether
we would go to war and whether there were WMDs to be used against us. We flatly
called this propaganda and cited the former head weapons inspector as stating
they had all been destroyed. This was a simple case of fact being trumped by
the shapers of that Myth.
In many of the same ways, the currency market is nothing more than the proverbial "marble
game" whereby the winning central banks return to the losers their medium
of exchange so that we may all play again. The end result is persistent inflation
by all sides that keep currencies relatively range bound over long periods
of time.
This is one reason we continue to take the opposing view, saying last May
that the euro would likely rally to 1.35 and then fail to go any higher.
At the height of "Peak Oil" we said crude oil had reached our
cited target of $80 and would now head lower to around $60 before going higher
again. While others continue to follow what we can call "Price Theory
Myths" (PTM) we continue to get the major market calls correct for our
clients.
PTM, is really a function of what is called "cognitive dissonance" -
a psychological term to define the condition that results whenever an individual
attempts to hold two incompatible, if not contradictory, thoughts at the same
time even in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary.
In the markets this manifests itself when an analyst or trader identifies
with a commonly held Myth which will explain the current action in the market.
If the trader or analyst holds onto this Myth in the face of price action that
refutes it, it is cognitive dissonance. But more often than not, the same PTM
is then used to explain the counter move in the markets. For example, "Stocks
are higher because of falling oil prices." And, "Stocks are lower
because falling oil prices are pressuring profits."
We embrace the fallibility of the human mind, and its strong inclination
to allow facts to be overridden by attitudes, emotions, belief systems and
the resulting herd behavior.
Conforming to our mind-set to avoid conflict, it is interesting to note highly
educated people (think economists, traders, etc) will seek out information
that is consonant rather than dissonant with their own views, so as to avoid
cognitive dissonance.
We point this out because being on the frontline to challenge commonly held
Myths is not an enviable position. Our motivation is profit. Understanding
when the groupthink is wrong is what affords the best trading potential on
a regular basis.
This is why well educated people do not even question that Central Banks
are owned by private banks who "loan" money to our nations at interest.
The larger the deficit is, the more control private institutions gain over
the public. We do not question this because we prefer cognitive consistency
as the mechanism to protect our own self-image. People of all nations say, "I
am good, so my nation is good. Ergo, that which my nation does in my name is
also good." To question it creates cognitive dissonance.
Currency Focus: Our currency fund posted another good year, amid general
underperformance from well know currency managers. Perhaps our best advantage
is the long term approach we take, and our view that currencies are an "asset
class" unto themselves subject to overt manipulation.

We look for "undervalued," and "fundamentally bullish" currencies.
We evaluate them by baskets, thus eliminating the "dollar bias" inherent
by looking only at those rates. We add to the mix Purchasing Power Parity measures,
then sentiment and finally look for technical measures to give us a good indication
of what will happen next.
If all things point to a good "macro" trade, then we execute,
caring little for overall entry level, as we are looking for 500 or more pips
in general. In doing so we have only had a handful of great months which account
for the bulk of our gains.
While non-volatile, this strategy has meant we beat (after fees) the combined
performance of the 2005 decline in the euro and the 2006 rally.
This is why perhaps in no other market do the skills of the manager matter
so much. In general, successful currency managers average about 10% a year
in up and down markets, after their fees. Yet the combined performance of major
currency managers has been near zero over this two year period, which we relate
to PTM as explained earlier.
One market we continue to like is the Mexican peso. When we moved to Mexico
in 2005 PTM was prevalent in the population’s general disdain for their
own currency. However, we now notice how shop owners try to return change to
us in dollars instead of pesos now. "No thank you," we say.
Meanwhile, the market has yet to recognize that the general population is
gaining a sense of awareness that their currency may not be in as bad of shape
as the US dollar.
Recall that for the last three months we continue to show charts of the Mexican
peso and its likely rally.
If you do not believe us that the Mexican peso "could" rally
by 30% over the coming years, then ask yourself, "What if the US dollar
falls further and the US pushes for a Continental Union similar to the European
Union." That would mean that the currencies of Mexico, US and Canada
converge into a currency unit similar to the euro.
Also known as the "North American Security and Prosperity Partnership," it
is currently being debated by economists and politicians. We first heard of
this at the December FXCM expo where your editor was invited to speak alongside
Jim Rodgers on various topics related to foreign exchange.
A man from the audience asked me if I had heard of the "Amero" or
the "North American Currency Unit." I said I had not, and he cited
a recent CNBC
interview where he discusses the plans.
Our point is that information is power. If in the event that the dollar collapse
occurs (a low probablitiy event in our eyes), then the Amero becomes a priority
for every American. The US could easily convince Mexico to adopt a new currency
since most do not like theirs anyway. That leaves only the Canucks as a holdout,
who could be bribed with the prospect of cheaper alcohol. Thus the Amero would
be born and provoke a rapid rise in the Mexican peso as this under-loved currency
would be included the new currency basket.
Further in-depth analysis and more specific trading recommendations are
available through our daily Morning
Market Updates and FxSignalZone reports.
|