|
Following up on today's lackluster durable goods report, tomorrow's 4th quarter
GDP report may be significantly lower than the 3.5% advanced number due to
inventory and trade data revisions. The new figure will be closer to my assessment
that today's economy remains anemic.
Some market pundits -- myself included -- had predicted the U.S. economy would
be in recession by the second half of 2007. It now appears unlikely the economy
will reach recessionary levels by the predicted timeline since a recession
is defined by two consecutive quarters of negative G.D.P. growth. Despite the
lower figure we're likely to see today (which could be revised down to near
2%), it is my view that the economy would have shown as being even weaker if
not for two factors: the war in Iraq and increased stimulus from the Fed.
It turns out I underestimated the commitment of central banks around the world
to accelerate money supply growth rates as well as spending for the war on
terror to exaggerate G.D.P. growth.
Military Stimulus
Congressman Ron Paul of Texas said it plainly with his Feb. 16th 2007 statement
before the House Financial Services Committee. "G.D.P. purportedly is now growing
at 3.5% and everyone seems pleased. What we fail to understand is how much
government entitlement spending contributes to the increase in the G.D.P...
just buying military weapons... contributes to G.D.P. growth!"
And to demonstrate the age-old practice of elected officials' tendency toward
bolstering growth at any price, read what Senator John M. Thurston of Nebraska
said while urging the Senate to war against Spain way back in 1898: "War with
Spain will increase the business and earnings of every American railroad, it
would increase the output of every American Factory, it would stimulate every
branch of industry and domestic commerce."
It is just plain silly to say that war somehow brings about economic growth.
While military conflict is sometimes necessary, of course, one need merely
understand the broken
window fallacy, a brief, powerful lesson from Bastiat, to comprehend why
war represents an economic cost regardless of how essential its purpose.
Given the way GDP is calculated, however, it is difficult to estimate exactly
how much the war is "adding" to today's economic statistics (via the purchasing
of weapons, munitions, etc.). What is clear is that the amount of dollars being
spent -- and under-accounted for -- is staggering. The Iraq war is currently
costing $300 million per day -- $700 billion in direct spending since the war's
inception. Could government contracts with the nation's defense contractors
possibly be so valuable as to be more than covering that amount? Not likely,
yet such expenditures count as additions to GDP.
Central Bank Stimulus
At the same time, there can be little doubt as to the excess in global liquidity
which is keeping interest rates in the U.S. artificially low. Just look at
the money supply growth rates global central bankers have managed to engender:
Brazil 18.2%, India 19.5%, China 17%, England 14% and U.S. 11% (source NowandFutures.com).
Unlike what most strategists would have you believe, the gold market presages
the continuation of this liquidity and is not merely following the price of
oil. The very day the BOJ raised rates one quarter point gold advanced over
$20 per ounce because Governor Fukui indicated that rates would not rise steadily
and the BOJ would remain accommodative, serving notice that the Yen carry trade
will not soon end.
Remembering the "R" Word
So despite this continuing stimulus, will the slowing housing market finally
push the U.S. economy into recession? Consider some interesting facts:
- A record number of 69% of individuals who own their home
- The number of vacant homes on the market is also at a record
- The inventory of existing homes for sale is near a record
- New home construction is outpacing intrinsic demand of 1.15mm units per
year
- Price-to-income ratios are near a record high
- Sub-prime mortgage meltdowns indicate the inventory of homes for sale could
increase dramatically. According to the investment bank Friedman, Billings,
Ramsey, 10% of all sub-prime mortgages are delinquent by 90 days!
If Bernanke behaves untrue to form -- allowing a contraction in the
money supply to occur -- a recessionary/deflationary cycle could ensue. However,
my best guess is that the Fed will maintain the funds rate at 5.25% for the
foreseeable future and flood the economy with money to avoid a crisis in the
banking and hedge fund sector. In this scenario the economy may show a positive
growth number for Q1 and Q2 but stay well below trend growth.
Despite calming words from certain members of the Fed recently about how inflation
is under control, investors would be wise to stay focused on inflation-hedged
strategies at this time.
**Speaking of inflation-hedged assets, the ongoing story surrounding Canadian
Energy Trusts continues to interest many investors. We have the exclusive right
to bring you a special report on the recent Canadian royalty trust tax announcement
from Roger Conrad, one of the leading commentators on this industry. His report
contains a discussion of many individual energy trusts and can be downloaded
here: http://www.deltaga.com/reportForm.asp?rep=4.
|