|
Almost all the S&P 500 companies have reported fourth quarter earnings
and the tally now shows earnings increased 11.7%. While this was higher than
estimates that prevailed at the end of the quarter (10.0%), earnings failed
to achieve the 12.8% growth expected at the beginning of the fourth quarter.
This was the first time since the fourth quarter of 2005, which was likely
a function of the hurricanes that hit the Gulf Coast, and was only the second
quarter since the first quarter of 2003 that this has happened. Excluding the
fourth quarter of 2005, the last time earnings growth went from beating estimates
to missing estimates was the third quarter of 2000 and happened in eight of
the next nine quarters. Incidentally, this almost perfectly coincided with
the peak and the bottom of the S&P 500. It's likely that first quarter
earnings growth will also be lower than estimates at the beginning of the quarter.
S&P 500 earnings are now expected to grow 3.9% compared to 8.7% at the
beginning of the year. Earnings growth estimates for the rest of the year have
also be reduced. Analysts have reduced S&P 500 earnings growth to 6.4%
for 2007. This estimate is likely to come down since the quarterly estimates
for the first three quarters of the year are 3.9%, 4.4% and 6.0%, for an average
of 4.6% for the first three quarters. First Call has not published consensus
estimates for the fourth quarter of 2007 yet, but it appears earnings growth
would have to accelerate substantially in order for earnings to increase 6.4%
for the full year.
Last week, Nordstrom's reported fourth quarter earnings of $0.89 per share
and twenty cents better than last year. Results were helped by same store sales
jumping 8.3% and 100 basis point increase in EBIT margin. Investors were expecting
more margin improvement and earnings fell shy of analysts' estimates by a penny.
Additionally, the company guided analysts to expect earnings of $2.78 to $2.84
per share for this year, which was about a dime lower than consensus estimates
of $2.91.
Retailers will report February same store sales on Thursday. There is a chance
that results will not meet investors' expectations. According to the ICSC,
chain stores sales decelerated every week last month. Last week, sales were
only 1.5% better than last year. This was the smallest weekly gain since July
8, 2003. Michael Niemira, chief economist for the ICSC, attributed the slowdown
to weather. He also slightly reduced his forecasts for February from 3.0% to
between 2.5% to 3.0%. This would be lower than the 3.5% gain last month. According
to Thompson Financial, Wall Street analysts expect same store sales growth
to weaken from January. Wall Street is forecasting same store sales will advance
3.0% and 4.1% excluding Wal-Mart. This compares to 4.9% and 5.0% gains in January.
Last week, the Conference Board reported that consumer confidence reached
the highest level since August 2001. The current situation jumped 5.1 points
to 139.0. Expectations only increased 0.4 points to 94.8. Complacent might
prove a better term rather than confident. There were declines in both jobs
plentiful and jobs hard to get. Jobs viewed hard to get dropped to lowest level
since August 2001. Interestingly, while jobs were viewed a little more positively,
income expectations were muted. Only 17.7% expected income to increase, the
lowest May 2006. Plans to purchase an automobile dropped to 5.4%, almost a
full percentage point less than last month. But more interesting was the drop
in plans to buy a new car. Only 2.2% of consumers anticipate buying a new car,
down from 3.0% last month and the lowest response since November 2004. This
cannot be good news for Detroit - losing market share in a declining market.
Another indication that the consumer is tapped out was that plans to take a
vacation dropped 6.1 percentage points to 39.9%. This is the lowest level since
the survey was started in 1980. A subset of this is whether travel will be
done by air or car. Considering that travel by air only dropped 20 basis points,
and by car fell four percentage points could be more evidence that middle income
households are coming under pressure. Retail sales continued to decelerate
last week. The ICSC reported that chain store sales increased 2.2%.
Housing data was mixed last week. Existing home sales were much better than
expected, but new home sales slumped. Existing home sales increased 3% in January.
This was the largest jump since January 2005. The median price fell 5.0% from
December, which was the largest drop since the data series started in 1999.
The year-over-year drop in price was 3.1%. New home sales dropped 16.6% to
937,000 in January and are off 21.3% compared to last January. The West clearly
suffered the brunt of the decline, dropping 37.4% in just the past month and
has been chopped by 53.8% compared to last January. Total supply dropped by
1,000 to 540,000 homes, but with the drop in sales, the months supply jumped
from 5.7 months to 6.8 months. Lastly, pending home sales dropped 4.1%, which
was the largest monthly drop since last July.
Hovnanian reported first quarter preliminary results this week. Unit orders
dropped 23% as the cancellation rate increased 100 basis points from the previous
quarter to 36%. The company noted that excluding its Fort Meyers, FL operations,
orders would have only declined 2%. It appears the upper end of the housing
market is doing better than the overall market. At a conference hosted by Citigroup,
Toll Brothers said that its cancellation rate dropped to 16% over the past
five weeks, down from 29.8% at the end of its January quarter. Just a few short
hours later, D.R. Horton's CEO, Donald Tomnitz, uttered what turned out to
be the quote of the day, "I don't want to be too sophisticated here, but '07
is going to suck. All twelve months of the calendar year."
Over the past two weeks, there have been several indications that the manufacturing
sector has weakened. Durable goods orders dropped 7.8% in January. This was
the third drop of over 7% over the past year. Excluding transportation, orders
dropped 3.1%, matching the weakest month since June 2002. This data series
is volatile and part of the weakness was giving back strong gains last month.
In December, durable goods orders increased 2.8% and 2.6% excluding transportation.
The year-over-year change does smooth the data. Compared to last January, orders
were up 2.1%, similar to the three previous months.
Richmond Fed survey indicated that conditions have not improved in February.
The overall index increased one point, but still signified a slowing at -10.
Only vendor lead times and wages were positive, which indicates expansion.
Average workweek and number of employees registered the two biggest drops,
down 10 to -20 and down eight to -13 respectively. Not only is activity slowing,
but the survey showed that manufacturers are getting squeezed by prices. The
average price paid increased 3.52% whereas the change in prices received increased
only 1.58%. This discrepancy of almost 200 basis points is the largest since
December 2005. The Chicago PMI survey showed similar deterioration. Chicago
PMI dropped for the fourth time in five months to a new four-year low. This
was the second month of the index being below 50. It is also interesting to
note that companies are pushing out capital equipment outlays. The lead time
for capital equipment has lengthened from 111.7 days in September to 129.3
days. Similar to the Richmond survey, the Chicago PMI reported that prices
paid rose in February. The index tracking prices paid increased 8.3 points
to 63.3, the highest since August.
The productivity report from the Department of Labor surprised economists
as productivity increased 1.6% during the fourth quarter, almost half the gain
that was first reported. More importantly, compensation per hour jumped 8.2%.
These two factors combined resulted in unit labor costs jumping 6.6%, the second
highest quarterly increase in the past five years. It is also interesting to
note that compensation per hour was highest in the business sector and lowest
in nondurable manufacturing. This report highlights the problem the Fed faces
trying to navigate economic policy. The segments of the economy that are languishing
won't necessarily be boosted by looser economic policy. More likely, more credit
would flow to areas that are already experiencing a boom and the areas of the
economy that are lagging would continue to lag.
There have been several data points indicating that economic activity has
moderated, but it has been mostly confined to the manufacturing sector. Plus
there is some evidence that this has only been an inventory correction as end
demand has remained a stronger area of the economy. Recently, end demand looks
to have started to wane. Almost every time this has happened, interest rates
have retreated and personal consumption was jump started. The recent turmoil
in the subprime mortgage sector could disrupt this cycle, especially if it
starts to spread. There were numerous stories discussing the mortgage reset
problem facing homeowners. Up until last week, most of these borrowers would
have been able to refinance, which would have mitigated a lot of the fears.
This is a lot less certain now and could be the tipping point for the seemingly
endless consumer spending spree.
|