|
"Millions at risk of losing homes" was the headline on the news wires on Wednesday,
March 14. This happened on the day when the stock market showed a positive
intraday reversal on strong trading volume. Obviously, the stock market wasn't
put off by this negative piece of news.
If it were true that millions of Americans risk losing their homes over the
sub-prime mortgage fiasco, the market would have already tanked by now. Remember,
the stock market is a leading indicator and the men in positions of power to
control it see all and know all, well in advance of the rest of us. If the
money controllers saw a massive housing collapse, and knowing full well what
it would mean for the economy and financial system, they would have sold out
long ago and the market wouldn't be at the relatively high levels of today.
Moreover, we wouldn't be seeing high levels of insider buying, which we most
certainly are right now.
You may remember back in 1999 in the days and weeks leading into the fateful "New
Millennium" of Jan. 1, 2000. So many people were expecting the lights to go
out worldwide, figuratively and literally. Worst-case scenarios and an "Apocalypse
Now!" mentality abounded. Yet as the fateful date drew near it became obvious
that the so-called Y2K Crisis wouldn't materialize because the stock market
was making all-time highs right up until the last trading day of 1999. Had
the powers-that-be foreseen a genuine Y2K collapse they would have cashed out
well in advance of the date and in so doing cracked the markets big time. A
strong stock market in the face of a supposed "crisis" generally means the
crisis is overblown, at least as far as its ability to severely impact the
economy.
Could the scare stories over the sub-prime lending debacle be the final wash-out
phase of the U.S. housing market correction? I think it could be. It's certainly
typical of past wash-outs of bear markets and as usual the mainstream press
is doing a stellar job of exaggerating the negatives and trying to scare the
country out of its collective wits. They've got everyone and their brother-in-law
running for the cellar screaming "The sky is falling, the sky is falling!" You
can't pick up any newspaper without seeing it plastered all over the front
page in big, bold headlines. An Internet friend sent me the following example
from the front page of the St. Paul (MN) Pioneer Press:
SUBPRIME MORTGAGE MELTDOWN
It doesn't get much more bearish than that! I take this barrage of pessimistic
headlines to be a contrarian indicator that the worst has already been discounted
by the markets and it shouldn't have that great of an impact on the national
economy. This isn't to say that the sub-prime mortgage problem is just going
to vanish overnight without any pain or negative consequences, for there almost
certainly will be more. But as far as major national economic pain...doubtful.
Sub-prime borrowers are more often than not equity rich and yet don't always
pay their bills on time. It's not as if they're dirt poor and one paycheck
away from the curb as the media would have us believe.
There always has to be financial crisis to support the "Wall of Worry" for
the economy and financial markets. In the '80s it was the S&L fiasco. A
few years ago it was the corporate accountability scandals. Major long-term
tops aren't characterized by problems coming to the surface: this is one of
the attributes of a bottoming or digestion (consolidation) process. At the
top of a major bull market the news is nearly always upbeat, especially on
the economic front, and bad news is nowhere to be found on the front pages
of newspapers. News outlets are never known for giving you a heads-up on what's
coming down the road. Their specialty is telling you what is already past and
convincing you that it still remains a pressing concern for today and tomorrow.
So whenever you see the "fiasco parade" in the headlines day after day you're
normally safe in assuming the worst has already been discounted and that the
crisis of the hour (whatever it happens to be) has already done most of its
damage.
While we're on the subject of the real estate market and the discounting mechanism
of the markets, it's interesting to note that despite all the hoopla surrounding
the sub-prime mortgage fiasco the action of some of the leading real estate
and homebuilding stocks hasn't been all that bad, all things considered. The
Dow Jones REIT Index (DJR) has been showing some relative strength recently
compared to the S&P 500 Index (SPX). Even the Housing Sector Index (HGX)
is still well off its lows of last July and has only retraced about 50% of
its July-February recovery rally. If the national real estate market were in
nearly as bad of shape as the media would have us believe, then HGX and DJR
would be in much worse condition.

The tape action of Wednesday's (Mar. 14) intraday turnaround was promising.
Volumes were good and investor sentiment couldn't be more bearish right now
(which is positive from a contrarian standpoint). The AAII investor sentiment
poll came out showing only 33% bulls (one of the lowest readings of the past
year) while the percentage of bearish investors was a fairly high 45%. This
is the third consecutive net bearish reading of the weekly AAII poll and the
bear-to-bull ratio this week was second only to the major interim low of last
July.
Another area that isn't as bad as it's being made out is the emerging markets.
Veteran market forecaster Steve Todd brought something to my attention recently
that's worth repeating. He pointed out that the Emerging Market ETF (EEM) tends
to lead the S&P at turning points and as such can be used as a leading
indicator for the SPX. At the most recent low the EEM made a distinctively
higher low compared to the SPX. This shows relative strength and suggests the
SPX should find its legs and regain its strength.

The best relative strength has been shown among the semiconductor stocks,
however. There are quite a few "semis" that have significantly outstripped
the market on the upside in the past couple of weeks and many have recently
appeared on the list of stocks making new 52-week highs. That's quite promising
for the broad market outlook, especially since the semiconductors also tend
to be leading indicators.
The gold and silver mining stocks as a group have pretty much performed in
line with the broad market since the late February correction with quite a
few relative strength out-performers among the PM stocks. There are still some
attractive stocks among the gold and silvers despite the sharp correction in
the XAU and HUI indices recently, and of course the actual metals have held
up despite the across-the-board weakness. The dominant interim momentum indicator
for the gold and silver stocks is still rising and hasn't reversed yet, which
should add to the positive outlook for the relative strength stocks within
the sector.
|