|
Every recession commencing with the one in 1970 has been preceded by the combination of
a negative spread between the Treasury 10-year yield and the federal funds
rate and a year-over-year contraction in the CPI-adjusted monetary base
(bank reserves plus currency). When both of these variables are calculated
on a quarterly average basis, there have been no false recession alarms.
To date, every recession has been preceded by at least two quarters
of this combination. This is shown in Chart 1 in which the vertically-shaded
areas represent recessionary periods.
Chart 1

On a monthly average basis, this combination occurred back in July
and August of 2006 (see Chart 2). But in September, growth in the real monetary
base resumed enough to allow the quarterly average year-over-year change in
the real monetary base to be barely (0.1%) positive. With the release of the
February 2007 CPI data, this combination has reappeared. The real monetary
base in February was down 0.5% year-over-year and the spread was negative by
54 basis points. As things now stand, in order for the first quarter of this
year to have a positive year-over-year change in the real monetary base, the
March value of the real base would have to be about 0.2% above that of March
2006. With the year-over-year increase in the March CPI likely to be around
2.3%, this would require a year-over-year increase in the March nominal monetary
base of 2.5% in order to get a positive year-over-year change in the real monetary
base. The fact that this combination exists on a one-month basis suggests that
the conditions for a recession to develop exist, but are not yet sufficient to
suggest that a recession is imminent. So, I have put up the recession watch flag,
not yet the recession warning flag. But stay close to your weather radio.
Chart 2

Real Retail Sales Are Looking Peaked In Q1
Last week we discussed how soft nominal retail sales have been of late. With
Friday's release of the February CPI data, we can get a bead on real retail
sales. They are looking pretty piqued, too. Deflating nominal retail sales
by the CPI for consumer goods (but not services), we find that real retail
sales increased by less than 0.1% (not annualized) month-to-month in January
and contracted by almost 0.3% in February. The January-February average is
running at only 1.9% annual rate above the Q4:2006 average. Even if March real
retail sales increase 0.5% month-to-month, that would yield first quarter annualized
growth in these sales of only 2.4% -- a far cry from the 10.5% annualized growth
of Q4:2006. It must be the weather, huh? It can't be related to the sharp drop
in mortgage equity withdrawal, the slowdown in job growth and already record
high debt service burdens (see Chart 3) in the face of an onslaught of adjustable
rate mortgage resets.
Chart 3

US Banking System Has Record Mortgage Exposure
Chart 4 shows that at the end of 2006, US commercial banks' mortgage-related
assets represented 62.7% of their total earning assets - a post-WWII record
high. These mortgage-related assets included commercial as well as residential
mortgage-related loans and securities. And these assets include mortgages,
various kinds of mortgage-backed securities and the securities issued by government
sponsored enterprises such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which themselves
are mortgage-related. I have no way of knowing how much the now infamous CDOs
represent of the total. Mortgages alone are 45.8% of total earning assets.
A couple of weeks ago I was at a monetary policy conference in our nation's
capital at which Minneapolis Fed President Stern said that commercial banks
had sold off most of their "plain vanilla" loans via securitization, the implication
being that the remaining loans on their books were "tutti fruiti" (my words,
not his). When I asked President Stern if the remaining tutti fruiti were a
lot of exotic mortgage flavors, he seemed to wince, but did not respond.
Chart 4

Toll Brothers and D.H. Horton Evidently Participate in March NAHB Survey
The National Association of Home Builders released the results of their March
survey of demand conditions. I am not particularly interested in their 6-month
outlook or their perception of lookers. Rather, I want to know how they rate
current sales. And after showing incongruous strengthening - not absolute strength,
just strengthening - the March index of current sales of single-family homes
retreated by three points to a level of 37 (see Chart 5). This is more consistent
with what some of the more candid home builders have been saying of late. Last
week, a spokesperson for Toll Brothers said that so far the spring sales season
was a "bust." A couple of weeks before, the CEO of D.H. Horton said that the
new home sales market in 2007 would "xxxx." I can't repeat the word he used
to describe the outlook because this is a family financial service institution.
Suffice it to say, the Horton CEO was pessimistic. The recent tightening in
mortgage underwriting standards across all risk categories, while predictable,
will nevertheless put another down leg onto the housing recession. Therefore,
look for further declines in the Home Builders index.
Chart 5

|
Paul L. Kasriel, Director of Economic Research
The Northern Trust Company
Economic Research Department
Positive Economic Commentary
"The economics of what is, rather than what you might like it to be."
50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60675
The information herein is based on sources which The Northern Trust Company
believes to be reliable, but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness.
Such information is subject to change and is not intended to influence your
investment decisions.
Copyright © 2005-2009 The Northern
Trust Company
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|