|
Dear Subscribers,
Before we start our commentary, I want to alert our readers to a couple of
things. First of all, a new board has been set up in our MarketThoughts
discussion forum. Titled "Mutual
Funds, Hedge Funds, and ETFs," the board's purpose is to allow our readers
to discuss the latest developments in the mutual fund, hedge fund, and ETF
industry. Under our old organization, too many of these posts were getting "lost" in
our "Market Commentary" board. Moreover, I also believe that there is an "untapped
market" out there of potential posts, since many of our subscribers have a
disproportionate interest in individual funds but who just have never posted
since most of our posts did not revolve around this topic. Hopefully, this
will change going forward.
Second of all, a friend of mine recently sent me a link
containing Warren Buffett's old letters to shareholders from 1959 to
1969. These are a must-read. You can't find these letters anywhere else -
not even on the Berkshire Hathaway website.
Now, let us continue the rest of our commentary. First of all, following is
an update on our three most recent signals in our DJIA Timing System:
1st signal entered: 50% long position on September 7, 2006 at 11,385;
2nd signal entered: Additional 50% long position on September 25, 2006 at
11,505;
3rd signal entered: 100% long position SOLD on May 8, 2007 at 13,299, giving
us gains of 1,914 and 1,794 points, respectively.
As the bulls continue to have a "field day" with the bears (the Dow Industrials,
the Dow Transports, and the S&P 500 all closed at all-time highs for the
week), there are now storm clouds arriving on the horizon. Besides the many
things that I have previously discussed - such as weakening relative strength
of the American Exchange Brokers/Dealers Index, rising bond yields, and the
fact that many of the popular bear commentators have now "capitulated" to the
bull side - I have also mentioned that liquidity conditions have been deteriorating.
That was discussed in our mid-week commentaries during the last couple of weeks,
and I would again like to discuss this in today's commentary.
I would like to begin this discussion by giving our readers an update of our
MarketThoughts "Excess M" (MEM) indicator. This is an indicator that we have
not discussed for a while now, but I still believe it is a relevant indicator,
even in today's globalized world of financial flows. Readers can refresh their
memories on our MEM indicator by reading our October
23, 2005 commentary (this commentary is available for free), but basically,
here is the gist of it: Our MEM indicator is calculated by taking the difference
of the 52-week growth rate of the St. Louis Adjusted Monetary Base and the
52-week growth rate of M-3 (both indicators smoothed using their ten-week moving
averages). The rationale for using this is two-fold:
-
The St. Louis Adjusted Monetary Base (currency plus bank reserves) is
the only monetary aggregate that is directly controlled by the Federal
Reserve. One can see whether the Fed intends to tighten or loosen monetary
growth by directly observing the change in the adjusted monetary base.
By knowing what the Fed intends to do, we will know whether investors and
speculators are "fighting the Fed" so to speak, and ultimately, fighting
the Fed usually ends in tears more often than not.
-
The St. Louis Adjusted Monetary Base inherently has very little turnover
(i.e. low velocity). On the contrary, the components of M-3 (outside of
M-1) has higher turnover and is more risk-seeking. If M-3 is growing at
a faster rate than the adjusted monetary base, than it is very logical
to assume that velocity of money is increasing. Readers should note from
their macro 101 class that the Federal Reserve has no direct control on
M-3. Instead, M-3 is directly affected by the ability and willingness of
commercials banks, hedge funds, private equity funds, and foreign central
banks to lend and by the willingness of the general population to take
on risks or to speculate.
Since the Fed has stopped publishing M-3 statistics, this author has now revised
our MEM indicator accordingly. Instead of using M-3, we are now using a monetary
indicator that most closely resembles the usefulness of M-3 - that is, a measurement
which tries to capture the monetary indicators which inherently have the highest
turnover/velocity in our economy. We went back and found one measurement that
is very close - that of M-2 outside of M-1 plus Institutional Money Funds (the
latter is a component of M-3 outside of M-2 which the Fed is still publishing
on a weekly basis). That is, we have replaced M-3 with M-2 outside of M-1 plus
Institutional Money Funds in our new MEM indicator. Following is a weekly chart
showing our "new: MEM indicator vs. the St. Louis Adjusted Monetary Base vs.
M-3 vs. M-2 minus M-1 plus Institutional Money Funds from April 1985 to the
present:

Since our last discussion revolving around our MEM indicator, it has continued
to decline - signaling a further deterioration of prime liquidity vs. "secondary" liquidity.
That is, while foreign central banks such as the People's Bank of China and
the Reserve Bank of India, hedge funds, and commercial banks are still busy
creating liquidity, the Federal Reserve itself has continued to remove liquidity
from the global financial system. This is evident by the dismal 1.6% growth
in the St. Louis Adjusted Monetary base over the last 12 months. At this point
(similar to the 1995 to 1998 period), the world is being "held ransom" by both
the Bank of Japan, the Japanese Ministry of Finance, and the Japanese retail
investor, as these parties are now playing the role of "liquidity provider
of last resort" in the form of the Yen carry trade. Since Japan runs a current
account surplus, however, Japan is thus not a natural exporter of their currency
(unlike the U.S.). Moreover, the Yen carry trade - by any measure - is now
way, way, overstretched. That is - if this continues - at some point, there
would be a liquidity squeeze in Yen - not unsimilar to what occurred during
the Fall of 1998 (when the Yen appreciated over 10% in an hour). Readers should
continue to both watch the level of the Yen and the actions of the Federal
Reserve for signs of a continued decline in world liquidity.
Just how overstretched is the Yen carry trade, you may ask? While Yen carry
trade data is very difficult to come by, the Bank for International Settlements
(the BIS) does make a good attempt at gathering it, since it publishes data
of the amount of foreign currency derivatives outstanding on a semi-annual
basis, from both a notional standpoint and a market value standpoint. Since
looking at notional value is next to useless, we have chosen to look at the
total market value of the Yen currency derivatives instead. Following is a
chart showing the total amount of Yen currency derivatives outstanding from
June 1998 to December 2006 broken down by instrument:

Note that the December 2006 data was just released last month. More importantly,
the total amount of Yen currency derivatives outstanding just spiked higher
in the last six months of 2006, and has now surpassed the December 2001 highs
and is now at its highest level since December 1998. The above chart is a good
signal of how much of the Yen carry trade is taking place in the derivative
markets - and the answer is: Quite a bit. Moreover, it is important to remember
that a carry trade only works in a low volatility environment, and given that
the implied volatility of Yen options just touched an all-time low a couple
of weeks ago, my guess is that the environment will be less conducive to all
types of carry trades going forward, including the Yen carry trade.
Also note that the above data is now more than five months old - and given
the weakness of the Yen over the last five months against virtually all major
currencies (including the US$), there is good reason to believe that the short
position of the Yen carry trade has now reached an all-time high. Coupled with
the fact that the Fed is still taking away primary liquidity from the financial
system, my guess is that this will be a tough summer for the bulls - not just
stocks but on commodities and real estate as well.
More follows for subscribers...
|
Henry K. To, CFA
MarketThoughts.com
Henry To, CFA, is co-founder and partner of the economic advisory firm, MarketThoughts
LLC, an advisor to the hedge fund Independence Partners, LP. Marketthoughts.com
is a service provided by MarkertThoughts LLC, and provides a twice-a-week commentary
designed to educate subscribers about the stock market and the economy beyond
the headlines. This commentary usually involves focusing on the fundamentals
and technicals of the current stock market, but may also include individual
sector and stock analyses - as well as more general investing topics such as
the Dow Theory, investing psychology, and financial history.
In January 2000, Henry To, CFA of MarketThoughts LLC alerted his friends and
associates about the huge risks created by the historic speculative environment
in both the domestic and the international stock markets. Through a series
of correspondence
and e-mails during January to early April 2000, he discussed his reasons
and the implications of this historic mania, and suggested that the best solution
was to sell all the technology stocks in ones portfolio. He also alerted his
friends and associates about the possible ending of the bear market in gold
later in 2000, and suggested that it was the best time to accumulate gold mining
stocks with both the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Mining Index and the American
Exchange Gold Bugs Index at a value of 40 (today, the value of those indices
are at approximately 110 and 240, respectively).Readers who are interested
in a 30-day trial of our commentaries can find out more information from our MarketThoughts
subscription page.
Copyright © 2005-2009 MarketThoughts.com
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|